Implications of right aortic arch prenatal diagnosis: the multicentric nationwide ARCADE cohort.
Cardiology
Neonatology
Journal
Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition
ISSN: 1468-2052
Titre abrégé: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9501297
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Jul 2024
04 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
06
04
2024
accepted:
20
06
2024
medline:
5
7
2024
pubmed:
5
7
2024
entrez:
4
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study aims to describe the various presentations of the prenatally diagnosed isolated right aortic arch (RAA), that is, without associated congenital heart defect and to evaluate the impact of prenatal diagnosis of isolated RAA in terms of postnatal outcome. In this multicentric retrospective study, from 2010 to 2019, all live births with a prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of isolated RAA were included, with a 1-year postnatal follow-up. The concordance between the different diagnostic steps (prenatal ultrasound, postnatal ultrasound and postnatal CT scan) was evaluated using Gwet's AC1 coefficient. A total of 309 cases of prenatally diagnosed RAA were analysed, most of which had a left ductus arteriosus (83%). The concordance between prenatal and postnatal ultrasound diagnosis was excellent regarding the RAA type (AC1=0.97, 95% CI=(0.94 to 0.99)). The rare discrepancies mainly involved non-diagnosed or misdiagnosed double aortic arch (2%). CT scan was performed in 108 neonates (35%) and the concordance between prenatal ultrasound and postnatal CT scan was good regarding the RAA diagnosis (AC1=0.80, 95% CI=(0.69 to 0.90)) but poor regarding the distribution of brachiocephalic vessels (AC1=0.21, 95% CI=(0.06 to 0.36)). An associated genetic anomaly was sought for in half of the cases and identified in 4% of the cohort. During the first year of life, 50 (18%) infants presented with vascular ring symptoms and 24 (8%) underwent aortic arch surgery. This multicentric nationwide cohort of 309 prenatally diagnosed isolated RAA demonstrated the reliability of prenatal screening, highlighted the rare cases of discrepancies between prenatal and postnatal diagnosis and underlined the value of CT scan to improve the postnatal follow-up. NCT04029064.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38964845
pii: archdischild-2024-327242
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327242
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04029064']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Investigateurs
Marianne Peyre
(M)
Isabelle Durand
(I)
Tristan Hazelzet
(T)
Pauline Gras
(P)
Matthias Lachaud
(M)
Herve Joly
(H)
Guy Vaksmann
(G)
Florent Paoli
(F)
Claire Bertail
(C)
Yvan Bouzguenda
(Y)
Sylvie Falcon Eicher
(SF)
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.