Comparison of Intravitreal Ranibizumab and Laser Photocoagulation in the Treatment of Type I Retinopathy of Prematurity in Malaysia: A One-Year Follow-Up Study.

anti-vegf laser photocoagulation ranibizumab retinopathy of prematurity type i rop

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Historique:
accepted: 02 07 2024
medline: 5 7 2024
pubmed: 5 7 2024
entrez: 5 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aimed to evaluate the treatment efficacy, anatomical outcomes, and refractive outcomes of laser photocoagulation (LPC) and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) in the treatment of type I retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) at one-year follow-up. This is a retrospective study on the treatment of type I ROP and aggressive ROP (A-ROP) using LPC or IVR in three Malaysian hospitals providing pediatric ophthalmology services from January 2019 to December 2021. Information on gestational age, birth weight, ROP zone and stage, and underlying comorbidities was collected. Parameters for evaluating treatment efficacy include the time taken to achieve complete regression, the regression rate, and the reactivation rate. The anatomical and refractive outcomes were evaluated at one year of adjusted age. This study included 92 eyes from 46 infants. Of these, 42 eyes received LPC as the initial treatment, while 50 eyes underwent IVR. A higher percentage of infants with cardiovascular disease were treated with IVR (66.7%) compared to LPC (40%) (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in gestational age, birth weight, respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, or intraventricular hemorrhage between the two treatment groups (p>0.05). Infants treated with LPC had a higher regression rate than those treated with IVR, but they were also significantly more myopic and had worse best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Conversely, infants treated with IVR experienced a significantly higher reactivation rate compared to those treated with LPC. Logistic regression analysis showed no significant associations between gestational age, birth weight, plus disease, zone 1 ROP, and the choice of initial treatment with the reactivation of ROP. Both LPC and IVR effectively treat type I ROP in infants, with IVR yielding superior anatomical and refractive outcomes and LPC offering a lower reactivation rate. Understanding individual patient characteristics is crucial for treatment selection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38966779
doi: 10.7759/cureus.63712
pmc: PMC11223661
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e63712

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, Wardati H et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. National Medical Research Register (NMRR) issued approval NMRR ID-23-01753-OWD (IIR). Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Auteurs

Jami Wardati H (J)

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MYS.
Ophthalmology Clinic, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, MYS.
Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Selayang, Batu Caves, MYS.

Mustafa Khadijah (M)

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MYS.
Ophthalmology Clinic, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, MYS.

Mustafa Nurul-Farhana (M)

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MYS.
Ophthalmology Clinic, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, MYS.

Wahit Karimmah (W)

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MYS.
Ophthalmology Clinic, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, MYS.
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, MYS.

Yoon Kit Ivan Lai (YKI)

Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Selayang, Batu Caves, MYS.
Department of Ophthalmology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.

Md Razali Syahmi (MR)

Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.

Fiona Lee Min Chew (FLM)

Department of Ophthalmology, Sunway Medical Centre Velocity, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Selayang, Batu Caves, MYS.

Jamalia Rahmat (J)

Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.

Norhafizah Hamzah (N)

Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Tunku Azizah, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.

Ismail Shatriah (I)

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MYS.
Ophthalmology Clinic, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, MYS.

Classifications MeSH