Case detection delay in leprosy: Testing tool reliability and measurement consistency in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Tanzania.


Journal

PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 29 01 2024
accepted: 21 06 2024
medline: 5 7 2024
pubmed: 5 7 2024
entrez: 5 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Case detection delay (CDD) in leprosy is defined as the period between the onset of the first signs and symptoms and the time of diagnosis. A tool, consisting of a questionnaire and a detailed guide for researchers, which includes photos of typical skin signs and notes on establishing the timing of events, was developed to determine this period of delay in months in recently diagnosed leprosy patients. The aims of the study were to determine the reliability and consistency of this CDD assessment tool. This study was conducted in Ethiopia, Mozambique and Tanzania. Two types of consistency were considered: over time (test-retest reliability) and across different researchers (interrater reliability). A CDD questionnaire was administered to 167 leprosy patients who were diagnosed within 6 months prior to their inclusion. One month later, the same or another researcher re-administered the CDD questionnaire to the same patients. Both test-retest and interrater reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), where a value greater than or equal to 0.7 is considered acceptable. In this study, 10 participants (6.0%) were under 15 years of age, and 56 (33.5%) were women. In the test-retest assessment, the mean CDD from the first and second interviews was 23.7 months (95% CI 14.4-34.8) and 24.0 months (95% CI 14.8-33.2), respectively. The ICC for test-retest reliability was 0.99 (95% CI 0.994-0.997). For the interrater reliability assessment, the first and second interviews revealed a mean CDD of 24.7 months (95% CI 18.2-31.1) and 24.6 months (95% CI 18.7-30.5), respectively, with an ICC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.94). A standard error of measurement of 0.46 months was found in the test-retest and 1.03 months in the interrater measurement. Most answers given by participants during the first and second interviews were matching (≥86%). Most non-matching answers were in the 0-2 month delay category (≥46%). The tool, including a questionnaire to determine the CDD of newly diagnosed leprosy patients, was validated in three African countries. The test-retest and interrater measurements demonstrated that the instrument is reliable and measures consistently. The tool can be used in routine leprosy programmes as well as in research settings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Case detection delay (CDD) in leprosy is defined as the period between the onset of the first signs and symptoms and the time of diagnosis. A tool, consisting of a questionnaire and a detailed guide for researchers, which includes photos of typical skin signs and notes on establishing the timing of events, was developed to determine this period of delay in months in recently diagnosed leprosy patients. The aims of the study were to determine the reliability and consistency of this CDD assessment tool.
METHODS METHODS
This study was conducted in Ethiopia, Mozambique and Tanzania. Two types of consistency were considered: over time (test-retest reliability) and across different researchers (interrater reliability). A CDD questionnaire was administered to 167 leprosy patients who were diagnosed within 6 months prior to their inclusion. One month later, the same or another researcher re-administered the CDD questionnaire to the same patients. Both test-retest and interrater reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), where a value greater than or equal to 0.7 is considered acceptable.
RESULTS RESULTS
In this study, 10 participants (6.0%) were under 15 years of age, and 56 (33.5%) were women. In the test-retest assessment, the mean CDD from the first and second interviews was 23.7 months (95% CI 14.4-34.8) and 24.0 months (95% CI 14.8-33.2), respectively. The ICC for test-retest reliability was 0.99 (95% CI 0.994-0.997). For the interrater reliability assessment, the first and second interviews revealed a mean CDD of 24.7 months (95% CI 18.2-31.1) and 24.6 months (95% CI 18.7-30.5), respectively, with an ICC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.94). A standard error of measurement of 0.46 months was found in the test-retest and 1.03 months in the interrater measurement. Most answers given by participants during the first and second interviews were matching (≥86%). Most non-matching answers were in the 0-2 month delay category (≥46%).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The tool, including a questionnaire to determine the CDD of newly diagnosed leprosy patients, was validated in three African countries. The test-retest and interrater measurements demonstrated that the instrument is reliable and measures consistently. The tool can be used in routine leprosy programmes as well as in research settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38968310
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012314
pii: PNTD-D-24-00117
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0012314

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Mamo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Ephrem Mamo (E)

Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa university, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Robin van Wijk (R)

Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
NLR/Leprastichting, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Anne Schoenmakers (A)

Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
NLR/Leprastichting, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Kidist Bobosha (K)

Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Mengistu Legesse (M)

Addis Ababa university, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Thomas Hambridge (T)

Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Kitesa Debelo (K)

Deutsche Lepra- und Tuberkulosehilfe e.V. Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Fufa Daba (F)

Deutsche Lepra- und Tuberkulosehilfe e.V. Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Nelly Mwageni (N)

Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza, United Republic of Tanzania.

Abdoulaye Marega (A)

Lúrio University, Nampula, Mozambique.

Taye Letta (T)

Ministry of Health Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Ahmed Mohammed Eman (AM)

Deutsche Lepra- und Tuberkulosehilfe e.V. Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Banú Fumane (B)

NLR Mozambique, Nampula, Mozambique.

Helder Rassolo (H)

NLR Mozambique, Nampula, Mozambique.

Blasdus Franz Njako (BF)

Deutsche Lepra- und Tuberkulosehilfe e.V. Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.

Stephen E Mshana (S)

Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza, United Republic of Tanzania.

Jan Hendrik Richardus (JH)

Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Christa Kasang (C)

Deutsche Lepra- und Tuberkulosehilfe e.V, Würzburg, Germany.

Liesbeth Mieras (L)

NLR/Leprastichting, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH