The forearm elevation-compression test: a novel test for carpal tunnel syndrome.
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Neurophysiology
Phalen sign
Tinel sign
Journal
QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians
ISSN: 1460-2393
Titre abrégé: QJM
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9438285
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jul 2024
05 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
13
05
2024
revised:
31
05
2024
medline:
6
7
2024
pubmed:
6
7
2024
entrez:
6
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
As the time available to spend with patients decreases, a rapid test for bedside diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) could be useful. We describe the forearm elevation-compression test (FECT) in this context. The FECT was assessed in 40 patients with clinically suspected carpal tunnel syndrome and compared to Tinel's and Phalen's signs. Routine electromyography and nerve conduction tests (EMG/NCT) were performed in all cases. In addition, 85 healthy controls were examined by FECT and compared to the patient group. All three provocative tests, particularly FECT were frequently positive in suspected CTS. Neurophysiological tests were normal in 5 of 40 cases of clinically suspected CTS and the FECT was positive in all of these suggesting a positive predictive value of 87.5% if one accepts EMG/NCT as the reference. Amongst the healthy controls 18 of 85 (21.2%) were positive on the FECT suggestive of a high false positive rate or subclinical disease. It is proposed that the FECT is a useful addition to the clinical examination of suspected CTS. Although the positive rate may be falsely elevated this is offset by restricting the latency for tingling onset to 10 seconds or less (FECT2).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
As the time available to spend with patients decreases, a rapid test for bedside diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) could be useful.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
We describe the forearm elevation-compression test (FECT) in this context. The FECT was assessed in 40 patients with clinically suspected carpal tunnel syndrome and compared to Tinel's and Phalen's signs. Routine electromyography and nerve conduction tests (EMG/NCT) were performed in all cases. In addition, 85 healthy controls were examined by FECT and compared to the patient group.
RESULTS
RESULTS
All three provocative tests, particularly FECT were frequently positive in suspected CTS. Neurophysiological tests were normal in 5 of 40 cases of clinically suspected CTS and the FECT was positive in all of these suggesting a positive predictive value of 87.5% if one accepts EMG/NCT as the reference. Amongst the healthy controls 18 of 85 (21.2%) were positive on the FECT suggestive of a high false positive rate or subclinical disease.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
It is proposed that the FECT is a useful addition to the clinical examination of suspected CTS. Although the positive rate may be falsely elevated this is offset by restricting the latency for tingling onset to 10 seconds or less (FECT2).
Identifiants
pubmed: 38970371
pii: 7708405
doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcae121
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.