PTCOG Ocular Statement: Expert Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in Ocular Proton Therapy.

ocular proton therapy uveal melanoma

Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 13 07 2023
revised: 08 05 2024
accepted: 18 06 2024
medline: 7 7 2024
pubmed: 7 7 2024
entrez: 6 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Although rare cancers, ocular tumors are a threat to vision, quality of life, and potentially life expectancy of a patient. Ocular proton therapy (OPT) is a powerful tool for successfully treating this disease. The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Ocular Group (PTCOG Ocular) formulated an Evidence and Expert-Based Executive Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in OPT: Comparative dosimetric and clinical analysis with the different OPT systems is essential to set up planning guidelines, implement best practices, and establish benchmarks for eye preservation, vision, and quality of life measures. Contemporary prospective trials in select subsets of patients (e.g., tumors near the optic disc and/or macula) may allow for dosimetric and clinical analysis between different radiation modalities and beamline systems to evaluate differences in radiation delivery and penumbra, and resultant tumor control, normal tissue complication rates, and overall clinical cost-effectiveness. To date, the combination of multimodal imaging (fundus photography, ultrasound, etc.), ophthalmologist assessment, and clip surgery with radiation planning have been keys to successful treatment. Increased use of 3D imaging (CT/MRI) is anticipated although its spatial resolution might be a limiting factor (e.g., detection of flat diffuse tumor parts). Commercially produced ocular treatment planning systems are under development and their future use is expected to expand across OPT centers. Future continuity of OPT will depend on (i) maintaining and upgrading existing older dedicated low-energy facilities, (ii) maintaining shared, degraded beamlines at large proton therapy centers, and (iii) developing adapted gantry beams of sufficient quality to maintain the clinical benefits of sharp beam conformity. Option (i) potentially offers the sharpest beams, minimizing impact on healthy tissues, whilst (ii) and (iii) potentially offer the advantage of substantial long-term technical support and development as well as the introduction of new approaches. Significant patient throughputs and close cooperation between medical physics, ophthalmology, and radiotherapy, underpinned by mutual understanding, is crucial for a successful OPT service.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38971383
pii: S0360-3016(24)00748-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.017
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors, except for Jan-Willem Beenaker (JWB), declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript. JWB receives research support from Philips Healthcare and RaySearch Laboratories and receives grant support from Varian Medical Systems.

Auteurs

Jan Hrbacek (J)

Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland. Electronic address: jan.hrbacek@psi.ch.

Andrzej Kacperek (A)

University College London, UK.

Jan-Willem M Beenaker (JM)

Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; HollandPTC, Delft, the Netherlands.

Linda Mortimer (L)

The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Andrea Denker (A)

Helmholtz-Zentruim Berlin für Materialien und Energie, proton therapy (BE-APT).

Alejandro Mazal (A)

Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain.

Helen A Shih (HA)

Harvard Medical School; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 USA.

Remi Dendale (R)

Institut Curie Protontherapy center, Orsay, France.

Roelf Slopsema (R)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory Proton Therapy Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Jens Heufelder (J)

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BerlinProtonen am HZB and Department of Ophthalmology.

Kavita K Mishra (KK)

Proton Ocular Radiation Therapy Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Osher Center for Integrative Health, Osher Foundation Endowed Chair in Clinical Programs in Integrative Health, University of California San Francisco.

Classifications MeSH