Single Center Neurosurgical Outcomes and Trends in Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of 297 Sellar/Suprasellar Tumors Stratified by Duration of Neurosurgical Career.


Journal

World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 24 06 2024
accepted: 29 06 2024
medline: 7 7 2024
pubmed: 7 7 2024
entrez: 6 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS) is a common treatment for sellar and suprasellar tumors. While endoscopic training has improved over the years and formal fellowship training is now broadly available, the operative nuances of EETS conjectures the existence a learning curve as a neurosurgeon matures with experience. We aim to evaluate operative outcomes of three different experience levels of neurosurgeons over time at a single institution. We reviewed all adult patients who underwent EETS at Loyola University Medical Center by three early career, one mid-career, and two late career neurosurgeons from 2007 to 2023. A comparative assessment of patient demographics, tumor features, and surgical outcomes was done using metrics such as length of surgery, rates of gross total resection (GTR) and symptomatic improvement (SI), new postoperative steroid dependence, and development of diabetes insipidus (DI). T-tests and Chi-Square were used to statistically evaluate the study cohorts. A total of 297 patients underwent EETS. One hundred and three (35%) were operated on by an early career, 122 (41%) by a mid-career, and 72 (24%) by a late career neurosurgeon. Late-career surgeons had shorter operation times (144 vs. 180 minutes with early and mid-career, p=0.029) and increased GTR rates (p=0.008). There were no significant differences between the SI rates amongst various surgeon experience levels. Although not statistically significant, early-career neurosurgeons had lower rates of new postoperative steroid dependence. Patients of early career surgeons experienced significantly less DI (15% vs 40%, p=0.004). Late-career neurosurgeons had shorter operation lengths, achieved higher rates of GTR, and their patients experienced significantly higher rates of DI. Overall outcomes remained stable throughout the course of 16 years between different surgeon experience levels.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38971494
pii: S1878-8750(24)01138-0
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.162
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Faraz Behzadi (F)

Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center.

Joseph F Zywiciel (JF)

Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine.

Andrew Pickles (A)

Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine.

Mousa Javidialsaadi (M)

Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center.

Douglas E Anderson (DE)

Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center; Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine.

Vikram C Prabhu (VC)

Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center; Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine.

Anand V Germanwala (AV)

Department of Neurological Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center; Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine. Electronic address: agermanwala@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH