Human navigation strategies and their errors result from dynamic interactions of spatial uncertainties.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jul 2024
06 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
07
06
2023
accepted:
14
06
2024
medline:
7
7
2024
pubmed:
7
7
2024
entrez:
6
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Goal-directed navigation requires continuously integrating uncertain self-motion and landmark cues into an internal sense of location and direction, concurrently planning future paths, and sequentially executing motor actions. Here, we provide a unified account of these processes with a computational model of probabilistic path planning in the framework of optimal feedback control under uncertainty. This model gives rise to diverse human navigational strategies previously believed to be distinct behaviors and predicts quantitatively both the errors and the variability of navigation across numerous experiments. This furthermore explains how sequential egocentric landmark observations form an uncertain allocentric cognitive map, how this internal map is used both in route planning and during execution of movements, and reconciles seemingly contradictory results about cue-integration behavior in navigation. Taken together, the present work provides a parsimonious explanation of how patterns of human goal-directed navigation behavior arise from the continuous and dynamic interactions of spatial uncertainties in perception, cognition, and action.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38971789
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49722-y
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-49722-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5677Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Gallistel, C. R. The Organization of Learning. (The MIT Press, 1990).
Wolbers, T. & Hegarty, M. What determines our navigational abilities? Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 138–146 (2010).
pubmed: 20138795
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001
Loomis, J. M. et al. Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 122, 73–91 (1993).
pubmed: 8440978
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.1.73
Stangl, M., Kanitscheider, I., Riemer, M., Fiete, I. & Wolbers, T. Sources of path integration error in young and aging humans. Nat. Commun. 11, 2626 (2020).
pubmed: 32457293
pmcid: 7250899
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15805-9
Mallot, H. A. & Lancier, S. Place recognition from distant landmarks: human performance and maximum likelihood model. Biol. Cybern. 112, 291–303 (2018).
pubmed: 29480375
doi: 10.1007/s00422-018-0751-4
Cheung, A., Ball, D., Milford, M., Wyeth, G. & Wiles, J. Maintaining a cognitive map in darkness: the need to fuse boundary knowledge with path integration. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002651 (2012).
pubmed: 22916006
pmcid: 3420935
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002651
Mittelstaedt, Marie-Luise & Mittelstaedt, H. Idiothetic navigation in humans: estimation of path length. Exp. Brain Res. 139, 318–332 (2001).
pubmed: 11545471
doi: 10.1007/s002210100735
Maguire, E. A. et al. Knowing where and getting there: a human navigation network. Science 280, 921–924 (1998).
pubmed: 9572740
doi: 10.1126/science.280.5365.921
O’Keefe, J. & Dostrovsky, J. The hippocampus as a spatial map. Brain Res. 34, 171–175 (1971).
pubmed: 5124915
Warren, W. H. The dynamics of perception and action. Psychol. Rev. 113, 358 (2006).
pubmed: 16637765
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358
Banino, A. et al. Vector-based navigation using grid-like representations in artificial agents. Nature 557, 429–433 (2018).
pubmed: 29743670
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0102-6
Savelli, F. & Knierim, J. J. Origin and role of path integration in the cognitive representations of the hippocampus: computational insights into open questions. J. Exp. Biol. 222, jeb188912 (2019).
pubmed: 30728236
pmcid: 7375830
doi: 10.1242/jeb.188912
Cheung, A. & Vickerstaff, R. Finding the Way with a Noisy Brain. PLoS Comput.l Biol. 6, e1000992 (2010).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000992
Nardini, M., Jones, P., Bedford, R. & Braddick, O. Development of cue integration in human navigation. Curr. Biol. 18, 689–693 (2008).
pubmed: 18450447
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.021
Zhao, M. & Warren, W. H. How you get there from here: interaction of visual landmarks and path integration in human navigation. Psychol. Sci. 26, 915–924 (2015).
pubmed: 25944773
doi: 10.1177/0956797615574952
Chen, X., McNamara, T. P., Kelly, J. W. & Wolbers, T. Cue combination in human spatial navigation. Cogn. Psychol. 95, 105–144 (2017).
pubmed: 28478330
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.04.003
Waller, D., Loomis, J. M., Golledge, R. G. & Beall, A. C. Place learning in humans: The role of distance and direction information. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 2, 333–354 (2000).
doi: 10.1023/A:1015514424931
Chan, E., Baumann, O., Bellgrove, M. A. & Mattingley, J. B. From objects to landmarks: the function of visual location information in spatial navigation. Front. Psychol. 3, 304 (2012).
pubmed: 22969737
pmcid: 3427909
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00304
Foo, P., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A. & Tarr, M. J. Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 31, 195–215 (2005).
pubmed: 15755239
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.195
Wiener, J. M., Berthoz, A. & Wolbers, T. Dissociable cognitive mechanisms underlying human path integration. Exp. Brain Res. 208, 61–71 (2011).
pubmed: 20972774
doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2460-7
Tcheang, L., Bulthoff, H. H. & Burgess, N. Visual influence on path integration in darkness indicates a multimodal representation of large-scale space. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1152–1157 (2011).
pubmed: 21199934
pmcid: 3024704
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011843108
Cheng, K., Shettleworth, S. J., Huttenlocher, J. & Rieser, J. J. Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychological Bull. 133, 625–637 (2007).
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.625
Kang, Y. H. R., Wolpert, D. M. & Lengyel, M. Spatial uncertainty and environmental geometry in navigation. bioRxiv (2023).
Lee, D. D., Ortega, P. A. & Stocker, A. A. Dynamic belief state representations. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 25, 221–227 (2014).
pubmed: 24632510
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.01.018
Belousov, B., Neumann, G., Rothkopf, C. A. & Peters, J. R. Catching heuristics are optimal control policies. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, (eds Lee, D., Sugiyama, M., Luxburg, U., Guyon, I. & Garnett, R.) vol. 29. (Curran Associates, Inc., 2016).
Straub, D. & Rothkopf, C. A. Putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics. eLife 11, e76635 (2022).
pubmed: 36173094
pmcid: 9522207
doi: 10.7554/eLife.76635
Johan Åström, K. Optimal control of markov processes with incomplete state information. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 10, 174–205 (1965).
doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(65)90154-X
Wolpert, D. M. & Ghahramani, Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1212–1217 (2000).
pubmed: 11127840
doi: 10.1038/81497
Todorov, E. & Jordan, M. I. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 1226–1235 (2002).
pubmed: 12404008
doi: 10.1038/nn963
Shadmehr, R. & Mussa-Ivaldi, S. Biological learning and control: how the brain builds representations, predicts events, and makes decisions. MIT Press (2012).
Papadopoulos, AlessandroVittorio, Bascetta, L. & Ferretti, G. Generation of human walking paths. Autonomous Robots 40, 59–75 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s10514-015-9443-2
Jones, K. E., Hamilton, Antonia F. de C. & Wolpert, D. M. Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. J. Neurophysiol. 88, 1533–1544 (2002).
Fagan, W. F. et al. Spatial memory and animal movement. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1316–1329 (2013).
pubmed: 23953128
doi: 10.1111/ele.12165
Patil, S. et al. Scaling up Gaussian belief space planning through covariance-free trajectory optimization and automatic differentiation. In Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics XI, 515–533 (Springer, 2015).
Kessler, F. & Rothkopf, C. Probabilistic Navigation. Zenodo Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11060800 (2024).
Souman, J. L., Frissen, I., Sreenivasa, M. N. & Ernst, M. O. Walking straight into circles. Curr. Biol. 19, 1538–1542 (2009).
pubmed: 19699093
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.053
Julian, J. B., Keinath, A. T., Marchette, S. A. & Epstein, R. A. The neurocognitive basis of spatial reorientation. Curr. Biol. 28, R1059–R1073 (2018).
pubmed: 30205055
pmcid: 6161705
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.057
Whittington JCR, McCaffary D, Bakermans JJW, Behrens TEJ. How to build a cognitive map. Nat Neurosci., 25, 1257–1272 (2022).
Jetzschke, S., Ernst, M. O., Froehlich, J. & Boeddeker, N. Finding home: landmark ambiguity in human navigation. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 11, 132 (2017).
pubmed: 28769773
pmcid: 5513971
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00132
Arleo, A. & Rondi-Reig, L. Multimodal sensory integration and concurrent navigation strategies for spatial cognition in real and artificial organisms. J. Integr. Neurosci. 6, 327–366 (2007).
pubmed: 17933016
doi: 10.1142/S0219635207001593
Parra-Barrero, E., Vijayabaskaran, S., Seabrook, E., Wiskott, L. & Cheng, S. A map of spatial navigation for neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 152, 105200 (2023).
Scherer, J. et al. Not seeing the forest for the trees: combination of path integration and landmark cues in human virtual navigation. Front Behav Neurosci. 18, 1399716 (2024)
Darici, O. & Kuo, A. D. Humans plan for the near future to walk economically on uneven terrain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 120, e2211405120 (2023).
pubmed: 37126717
pmcid: 10175744
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211405120
Albrecht, S., Basili, P., Glasauer, S., Leibold, M. & Ulbrich, M. Modeling and analysis of human navigation with crossing interferer using inverse optimal control. IFAC Proc. Volumes 45, 475–480 (2012).
doi: 10.3182/20120215-3-AT-3016.00083
Arechavaleta, G., Laumond, J.-P., Hicheur, H. & Berthoz, A. The nonholonomic nature of human locomotion: a modeling study. In The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 158–163. (IEEE, Pisa, Italy, 2006).
Carlisle, RebeccaElizabeth & Kuo, A. D. Optimization of energy and time predicts dynamic speeds for human walking. Elife 12, e81939 (2023).
pubmed: 36779697
pmcid: 10030114
doi: 10.7554/eLife.81939
McNamara, T. P. & Chen, X. Bayesian decision theory and navigation. Psychon Bull Rev. 29, 721–752 (2022).
Zhao, M. & Warren, W. H. Non-optimal perceptual decision in human navigation. Behav. Brain Sci. 41, e250 (2018).
pubmed: 30767832
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18001498
Shams, L. & Beierholm, U. R. Causal inference in perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 425–432 (2010).
pubmed: 20705502
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.001
Zhao, M. & Warren, W. H. Environmental stability modulates the role of path integration in human navigation. Cognition 142, 96–109 (2015).
pubmed: 26026422
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.008
Simon, DylanAlexander & Daw, N. D. Neural correlates of forward planning in a spatial decision task in humans. J. Neurosci. 31, 5526–5539 (2011).
pubmed: 21471389
pmcid: 3108440
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4647-10.2011
Khamassi, M. & Humphries, M. D. Integrating cortico-limbic-basal ganglia architectures for learning model-based and model-free navigation strategies. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6, 79 (2012).
pubmed: 23205006
pmcid: 3506961
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00079
Chersi, F. & Burgess, N. The cognitive architecture of spatial navigation: hippocampal and striatal contributions. Neuron 88, 64–77 (2015).
pubmed: 26447573
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.021
Roy, C., Wiebusch, D., Botsch, M. & Ernst, M. O. Did it move? Humans use spatio-temporal landmark permanency efficiently for navigation. J Exp Psychol Gen. 152, 448–463 (2023).
Hafting, T., Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Moser, May-Britt & Moser, E. I. Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature 436, 801–806 (2005).
pubmed: 15965463
doi: 10.1038/nature03721
Taube, J. S., Muller, R. U. & Ranck, J. B. Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. J. Neurosci. 10, 420–435 (1990).
pubmed: 2303851
pmcid: 6570151
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-02-00420.1990
McNaughton, B. L., Battaglia, F. P., Jensen, O., Moser, E. I. & Moser, May-Britt. Path integration and the neural basis of the’cognitive map’. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 663–678 (2006).
pubmed: 16858394
doi: 10.1038/nrn1932
Savelli, F., Luck, J. D. & Knierim, J. J. Framing of grid cells within and beyond navigation boundaries. Elife 6, e21354 (2017).
pubmed: 28084992
pmcid: 5271608
doi: 10.7554/eLife.21354
Hardcastle, K., Ganguli, S. & Giocomo, L. M. Environmental boundaries as an error correction mechanism for grid cells. Neuron 86, 827–839 (2015).
pubmed: 25892299
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.039
Save, E., Nerad, L. & Poucet, B. Contribution of multiple sensory information to place field stability in hippocampal place cells. Hippocampus 10, 64–76 (2000).
pubmed: 10706218
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(2000)10:1<64::AID-HIPO7>3.0.CO;2-Y
Olson, J. M., Li, J. K., Montgomery, S. E. & Nitz, D. A. Secondary motor cortex transforms spatial information into planned action during navigation. Curr. Biol. 30, 1845–1854 (2020).
pubmed: 32302586
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.016
Valerio, S. & Taube, J. S. Path integration: how the head direction signal maintains and corrects spatial orientation. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1445–1453 (2012).
pubmed: 22983210
pmcid: 3458173
doi: 10.1038/nn.3215
Etienne, A. S. & Jeffery, K. J. Path integration in mammals. Hippocampus 14, 180–192 (2004).
pubmed: 15098724
doi: 10.1002/hipo.10173
Vickerstaff, R. J. & Cheung, A. Which coordinate system for modelling path integration? J. Theor. Biol. 263, 242–261 (2010).
pubmed: 19962387
doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.11.021
Sreenivasan, S. & Fiete, I. Grid cells generate an analog error-correcting code for singularly precise neural computation. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1330–1337 (2011).
pubmed: 21909090
doi: 10.1038/nn.2901
Towse, B. W., Barry, C., Bush, D. & Burgess, N. Optimal configurations of spatial scale for grid cell firing under noise and uncertainty. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 369, 20130290 (2014).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0290
Koblinger, A., Fiser, J. & Lengyel, M. Representations of uncertainty: where art thou? Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 38, 150–162 (2021).
pubmed: 34026948
pmcid: 8121756
doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.009
Barry, C., Ginzberg, LinLin, O’Keefe, J. & Burgess, N. Grid cell firing patterns signal environmental novelty by expansion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 109, 17687–17692 (2012).
pubmed: 23045662
pmcid: 3491492
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209918109
Navarro Schröder, T. et al. Environmental anchoring of grid-like representations minimizes spatial uncertainty during navigation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/166306 (2020).
Madl, T., Franklin, S., Chen, K., Montaldi, D. & Trappl, R. Bayesian integration of information in hippocampal place cells. PLOS one 9, e89762 (2014).
pubmed: 24603429
pmcid: 3945610
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089762
Bourboulou, R. et al. Dynamic control of hippocampal spatial coding resolution by local visual cues. Elife 8, e44487 (2019).
pubmed: 30822270
pmcid: 6397000
doi: 10.7554/eLife.44487
Cheung, A. Probabilistic learning by rodent grid cells. PLoS computational Biol. 12, e1005165 (2016).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005165
Biegler, R. & GM Morris, R. Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning. Nature 361, 631–633 (1993).
pubmed: 8437622
doi: 10.1038/361631a0
Knierim, J. J., Kudrimoti, H. S. & McNaughton, B. L. Place cells, head direction cells, and the learning of landmark stability. J. Neurosci. 15, 1648–1659 (1995).
pubmed: 7891125
pmcid: 6578145
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-03-01648.1995
Campos, J. L., Butler, J. S. & Bülthoff, H. H. Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances. Exp. Brain Res. 218, 551–565 (2012).
pubmed: 22411581
doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3048-1
Liu, S., Kersten, D. J. & Legge, G. E. Effect of expansive optic flow and lateral motion parallax on depth estimation with normal and artificially reduced acuity. J. Vis. 23, 3–3 (2023).
pubmed: 37801321
pmcid: 10561791
doi: 10.1167/jov.23.12.3
Pickup, L. C., Fitzgibbon, A. W. & Glennerster, A. Modelling human visual navigation using multi-view scene reconstruction. Biol. Cybern. 107, 449–464 (2013).
pubmed: 23778937
pmcid: 3755223
doi: 10.1007/s00422-013-0558-2
Gootjes-Dreesbach, L., Pickup, L. C., Fitzgibbon, A. W. & Glennerster, A. Comparison of view-based and reconstruction-based models of human navigational strategy. J. Vis. 17, 11–11 (2017).
pubmed: 28813567
doi: 10.1167/17.9.11
Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B. & Young, M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vis. Res. 35, 389–412 (1995).
pubmed: 7892735
doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00176-M
Chrastil, E. R., Nicora, G. L. & Huang, A. Vision and proprioception make equal contributions to path integration in a novel homing task. Cognition 192, 103998 (2019).
pubmed: 31228680
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.010
Petzschner, F. H. & Glasauer, S. Iterative Bayesian estimation as an explanation for range and regression effects: a study on human path integration. J. Neurosci. 31, 17220–17229 (2011).
pubmed: 22114288
pmcid: 6623840
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2028-11.2011
Iaria, G., Petrides, M., Dagher, A., Pike, B. & Bohbot, V. éroniqueD. Cognitive strategies dependent on the hippocampus and caudate nucleus in human navigation: variability and change with practice. J. Neurosci. 23, 5945–5952 (2003).
pubmed: 12843299
pmcid: 6741255
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-13-05945.2003
Bates, S. L. & Wolbers, T. How cognitive aging affects multisensory integration of navigational cues. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 2761–2769 (2014).
pubmed: 24952995
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.04.003
Petrini, K., Caradonna, A., Foster, C., Burgess, N. & Nardini, M. How vision and self-motion combine or compete during path reproduction changes with age. Sci. Rep. 6, 29163 (2016).
pubmed: 27381183
pmcid: 4933893
doi: 10.1038/srep29163
Bostelmann, M., Lavenex, P. & Banta Lavenex, P. Children five-to-nine years old can use path integration to build a cognitive map without vision. Cogn. Psychol. 121, 101307 (2020).
pubmed: 32445986
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101307
Wu, Z., Kwon, M., Daptardar, S., Schrater, P. & Pitkow, X. Rational thoughts in neural codes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117, 29311–29320 (2020).
pubmed: 33229521
pmcid: 7703629
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912336117
Krakauer, J. W., Ghazanfar, A. A., Gomez-Marin, A., MacIver, M. A. & Poeppel, D. Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron 93, 480–490 (2017).
pubmed: 28182904
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041
Mobbs, D. et al. Promises and challenges of human computational ethology. Neuron 109, 2224–2238 (2021).
pubmed: 34143951
pmcid: 8769712
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.05.021
Kallie, C. S., Schrater, P. R. & Legge, G. E. Variability in stepping direction explains the veering behavior of blind walkers. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 33, 183–200 (2007).
pubmed: 17311487
Thrun, S., Burgard, W. & Fox, D. Probabilistic robotics. Intelligent robotics and autonomous agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. OCLC: ocm58451645 (2005).
Patil, S., Duan, Y., Schulman, J., Goldberg, K. & Abbeel, P. Gaussian belief space planning with discontinuities in sensing domains. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 6483–6490 (IEEE, Hong Kong, China, 2014).
Codling, E. A., Plank, M. J. & Benhamou, S. Random walk models in biology. J. R. Soc. interface 5, 813–834 (2008).
pubmed: 18426776
pmcid: 2504494
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0014
Platt, R., Tedrake, R., Kaelbling, L., & Lozano-Perez, T. Belief space planning assuming maximum likelihood observations. Proceedings of the Robotics: Science and Systems Conference, p. 8 (2010). https://www.roboticsproceedings.org/rss06/p37.html .
Andersson, Joel A. E., Gillis, J., Horn, G., Rawlings, J. B. & Diehl, M. CasADi – A software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control. Math. Program. Comput. 11, 1–36 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s12532-018-0139-4
Liaw, R. et al. Tune: A research platform for distributed model selection and training. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.05118 (2018).
Bohannon, R. W. & Andrews, A. W. Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 97, 182–189 (2011).
pubmed: 21820535
doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.12.004
Cutting, J. E. & Vishton, P. M. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In Perception of space and motion, p. 69–117 (Elsevier, 1995).
Daum, S. O. & Hecht, H. Distance estimation in vista space. Atten., Percept., Psychophys. 71, 1127–1137 (2009).
pubmed: 19525542
doi: 10.3758/APP.71.5.1127
Feldstein, I. T., Kölsch, F. M. & Konrad, R. Egocentric distance perception: a comparative study investigating differences between real and virtual environments. Perception 49, 940–967 (2020).
pubmed: 33002392
doi: 10.1177/0301006620951997
Brenner, E. & Smeets, JeroenB. J. Depth perception. Stevens’ Handb. Exp. Psychol. Cogn. Neurosci. 2, 1–30 (2018).
Kerr, J. L. Visual resolution in the periphery. Percept. Psychophys. 9, 375–378 (1971).
doi: 10.3758/BF03212671
Newsome, L. R. Visual angle and apparent size of objects in peripheral vision. Percept. Psychophys. 12, 300–304 (1972).
doi: 10.3758/BF03207209
Jürgens, R., Boss, T. & Becker, W. Estimation of self-turning in the dark: comparison between active and passive rotation. Exp. Brain Res. 128, 491–504 (1999).
pubmed: 10541743
doi: 10.1007/s002210050872
Rizzo, M. L. & J Székely, G. ábor Energy distance. wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Computational Stat. 8, 27–38 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/wics.1375
Vallat, R. Pingouin: statistics in python. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 1026 (2018).
doi: 10.21105/joss.01026