Increased anti-correlation between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the default mode network following Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): analysis of a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial.


Journal

Npj mental health research
ISSN: 2731-4251
Titre abrégé: Npj Ment Health Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918592488906676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 30 03 2023
accepted: 15 05 2024
medline: 7 7 2024
pubmed: 7 7 2024
entrez: 6 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

SNT is a high-dose accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) protocol coupled with functional-connectivity-guided targeting that is an efficacious and rapid-acting therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We used resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) data from a double-blinded sham-controlled randomized controlled trial

Identifiants

pubmed: 38971869
doi: 10.1038/s44184-024-00073-y
pii: 10.1038/s44184-024-00073-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

35

Subventions

Organisme : NIH Director's New Innovator Award
ID : MH119735

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Cole, E. J. et al. Stanford neuromodulation therapy (SNT): a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Psychiatry 179, 132–141 (2022).
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20101429 pubmed: 34711062
Friedrich, M. J. Depression is the leading cause of disability around the world. JAMA 317, 1517 (2017).
pubmed: 28418491
Zhdanava, M. et al. The prevalence and national burden of treatment-resistant depression and major depressive disorder in the United States. J. Clin. Psychiatry 82, 2 (2021).
Cash, R. F. H. et al. Using brain imaging to improve spatial targeting of transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression. Biol. Psychiatry 90, 689–700 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.05.033 pubmed: 32800379
Weigand, A. et al. Prospective validation that subgenual connectivity predicts antidepressant efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation sites. Biol. Psychiatry 84, 28–37 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.10.028 pubmed: 29274805
Fox, M. D., Buckner, R. L., White, M. P., Greicius, M. D. & Pascual-Leone, A. Efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation targets for depression is related to intrinsic functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. Biol. Psychiatry 72, 595–603 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.028 pubmed: 22658708 pmcid: 4120275
Liston, C. et al. Default mode network mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression. Biol. Psychiatry 76, 517–526 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.01.023 pubmed: 24629537 pmcid: 4209727
Zheng, A. et al. Two-week rTMS-induced neuroimaging changes measured with fMRI in depression. J. Affect. Disord. 270, 15–21 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.038 pubmed: 32275215
Hamilton, J. P., Farmer, M., Fogelman, P. & Gotlib, I. H. Depressive rumination, the default-mode network, and the dark matter of clinical neuroscience. Biol. Psychiatry 78, 224–230 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.020 pubmed: 25861700 pmcid: 4524294
Esteban, O. et al. fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI. Nat. Methods 16, 111–116 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4 pubmed: 30532080
Ciric, R. et al. Mitigating head motion artifact in functional connectivity MRI. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2801–2826 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0065-y pubmed: 30446748 pmcid: 8161527
Loo, C. K. et al. International randomized-controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation in depression. Brain Stimul. 11, 125–133 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.011 pubmed: 29111077
Li, C.-T. et al. Efficacy of prefrontal theta-burst stimulation in refractory depression: a randomized sham-controlled study. Brain 137, 2088–2098 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/brain/awu109 pubmed: 24817188
Cole, E. J. et al. Stanford accelerated intelligent neuromodulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 177, 716–726 (2020).
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19070720 pubmed: 32252538
Okamoto, M. et al. Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping. Neuroimage 21, 99–111 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.026 pubmed: 14741647
Shirer, W. R., Ryali, S., Rykhlevskaia, E., Menon, V. & Greicius, M. D. Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cereb. Cortex 22, 158–165 (2012).
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr099 pubmed: 21616982
Woolrich, M. W., Ripley, B. D., Brady, M. & Smith, S. M. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. Neuroimage 14, 1370–1386 (2001).
doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0931 pubmed: 11707093
Woolrich, M. W., Behrens, T. E. J., Beckmann, C. F., Jenkinson, M. & Smith, S. M. Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. Neuroimage 21, 1732–1747 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.023 pubmed: 15050594
Worsley, K. J. Statistical analysis of activation images. Funct. MRI 14, 251–270 (2001).
Elbau, I. G. et al. Functional connectivity mapping for rTMS target selection in depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 180, 230–240 (2023).
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20220306 pubmed: 36855880
Tura, A. & Goya-Maldonado, R. Brain connectivity in major depressive disorder: a precision component of treatment modalities? Transl. Psychiatry 13, 196 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02499-y pubmed: 37296121 pmcid: 10256697
Singh, A. et al. Default mode network alterations after intermittent theta burst stimulation in healthy subjects. Transl. Psychiatry 10, 75 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-0754-5 pubmed: 32094326 pmcid: 7040002
Singh, A. et al. Personalized repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation temporarily alters default mode network in healthy subjects. Sci. Rep. 9, 5631 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42067-3 pubmed: 30948765 pmcid: 6449366
Dijkstra, E. et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced heart-brain coupling: implications for site selection and frontal thresholding—preliminary findings. Biol. Psychiatry Global Open Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.01.003 (2023).
Eklund, A., Nichols, T. E. & Knutsson, H. Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7900–7905 (2016).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602413113 pubmed: 27357684 pmcid: 4948312

Auteurs

Niharika Gajawelli (N)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Andrew D Geoly (AD)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Jean-Marie Batail (JM)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Neuropsychiatrie du comportement et du développement, Centre Hospitalier Guillaume Régnier, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.

Xiaoqian Xiao (X)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Adi Maron-Katz (A)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Eleanor Cole (E)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Azeezat Azeez (A)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Ian H Kratter (IH)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Manish Saggar (M)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Nolan R Williams (NR)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA. nolanw@stanford.edu.

Classifications MeSH