A systems-based analysis to rethink the European environmental risk assessment of regulated chemicals using pesticides as a pilot case.

Biodiversity Fragmented regulatory areas Integrating prospective-retrospective assessments Landscape-scale risk assessment Long-term environmental impacts Substance-by-substance assessment

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 22 03 2024
revised: 07 06 2024
accepted: 03 07 2024
medline: 8 7 2024
pubmed: 8 7 2024
entrez: 7 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

A growing body of scientific literature stresses the need to advance current environmental risk assessment (ERA) methodologies and associated regulatory frameworks to better address the landscape-scale and long-term impact of pesticide use on biodiversity and the ecosystem. Moreover, more collaborative and integrative approaches are needed to meet sustainability goals. The One Health approach is increasingly applied by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to support the transition towards safer, healthier and more sustainable food. To this end, EFSA commissioned the development of a roadmap for action to establish a European Partnership for next-generation, systems-based Environmental Risk Assessment (PERA). Here, we summarise the main conclusions and recommendations reported in the 2022 PERA Roadmap. This roadmap highlights that fragmentation of data, knowledge and expertise across regulatory sectors results in suboptimal processes and hinders the implementation of integrative ERA approaches needed to better protect the environment. To advance ERA, we revisited the underlying assumptions of the current ERA paradigm; that chemical risks are generally assessed and managed in isolation with a substance-by-substance, realistic worst-case and tiered approach. We suggest optimising the use of the vast amount of information and expertise available with pesticides as a pilot area. It is recommended to as soon as possible adopt a systems-based approach, i.e. within the current regulatory framework, to spark a step-wise transition towards an ERA framed at a system level of ecological and societal relevance. Tangible systems-based and integrative steps are available. For instance, the rich sources of existing data for prospective and retrospective ERA of pesticides could be used to reality-benchmark existing and new ERA methods. To achieve these goals, collaboration among stakeholders across scientific disciplines and regulatory sectors must be strengthened.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38972402
pii: S0048-9697(24)04674-6
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174526
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

174526

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Johan Axelman (J)

Swedish Chemicals Agency (KemI), Sweden. Electronic address: johan.axelman@kemi.se.

Annette Aldrich (A)

Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), Switzerland.

Sabine Duquesne (S)

German Environment Agency (UBA), Germany.

Thomas Backhaus (T)

Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Stephan Brendel (S)

German Environment Agency (UBA), Germany.

Andreas Focks (A)

University of Osnabrück, Germany.

Sheila Holz (S)

Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Portugal.

Saskia Knillmann (S)

German Environment Agency (UBA), Germany.

Silvia Pieper (S)

German Environment Agency (UBA), Germany.

Emilia Silva (E)

LEAF Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA Institute Superior of Agronomy, University of Lisboa, Portugal.

Maria Schmied-Tobies (M)

German Environment Agency (UBA), Germany.

Christopher John Topping (CJ)

Aarhus University, Denmark.

Louise Wipfler (L)

Wageningen Environmental Research, the Netherlands.

James Williams (J)

Aarhus University, Denmark.

José Paulo Sousa (JP)

Centre for Functional Ecology, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal.

Classifications MeSH