Sonothrombolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction with electrocardiographic no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

ST-elevation myocardial infarction no-reflow sonothrombolysis ultrasound

Journal

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography
ISSN: 1097-6795
Titre abrégé: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8801388

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 23 02 2024
revised: 21 06 2024
accepted: 23 06 2024
medline: 8 7 2024
pubmed: 8 7 2024
entrez: 7 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Approximately 50% of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) suffer from microvascular no-reflow. Pre- and post-PCI sonothrombolysis has shown to decrease infarct size and improve left ventricular (LV) systolic function in STEMI patients receiving urgent PCI. The aim of this study was to investigate whether post-PCI sonothrombolysis alone in STEMI patients with persistent ST-elevation could reduce no-reflow and infarct size. STEMI patients with symptoms <12 hours, who had persistent ST-elevation (≤70% ST-resolution) after primary PCI. were randomized to sonothrombolysis or control. The primary endpoint was summed (Σ) ST-elevation 60 minutes after study intervention. Secondary endpoints included infarct size, myocardial perfusion score, LV ejection fraction on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at two months follow up, and clinical outcome at six months follow up. 67 STEMI patients with persistent ST-elevation after PCI were randomized (49 left anterior descending, 18 right coronary/left circumflex artery). No difference was observed in Σ ST-elevation 60 minutes after study intervention (mean difference: 0.6mm, 95% CI: -1.1 - 2.2, p=0.50). Complete ST-resolution occurred in 14 (40%) of patients treated with sonothrombolysis compared to six (19%) of controls (p=0.16). Myocardial perfusion score index (1.5 ±0.3 vs. 1.5 ±0.3, p=0.93), infarct size (18.0±10% vs. 16.8±11%; p=0.29) or LV ejection fraction on CMR (46±8% vs.47±11% in the control group; p=0.86) were comparable. Incidence of all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome and hospital admission for heart failure at six months follow up was similar between the groups (sonothrombolysis: 2, control: 5). In STEMI patients with persistent ST-elevation after PCI, post-PCI sonothrombolysis did not result in more ST-resolution or smaller infarct size compared to control subjects. The incidence of the combined clinical endpoints was remarkably low in this high-risk patient population.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
Approximately 50% of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) suffer from microvascular no-reflow. Pre- and post-PCI sonothrombolysis has shown to decrease infarct size and improve left ventricular (LV) systolic function in STEMI patients receiving urgent PCI. The aim of this study was to investigate whether post-PCI sonothrombolysis alone in STEMI patients with persistent ST-elevation could reduce no-reflow and infarct size.
METHODS METHODS
STEMI patients with symptoms <12 hours, who had persistent ST-elevation (≤70% ST-resolution) after primary PCI. were randomized to sonothrombolysis or control. The primary endpoint was summed (Σ) ST-elevation 60 minutes after study intervention. Secondary endpoints included infarct size, myocardial perfusion score, LV ejection fraction on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at two months follow up, and clinical outcome at six months follow up.
RESULTS RESULTS
67 STEMI patients with persistent ST-elevation after PCI were randomized (49 left anterior descending, 18 right coronary/left circumflex artery). No difference was observed in Σ ST-elevation 60 minutes after study intervention (mean difference: 0.6mm, 95% CI: -1.1 - 2.2, p=0.50). Complete ST-resolution occurred in 14 (40%) of patients treated with sonothrombolysis compared to six (19%) of controls (p=0.16). Myocardial perfusion score index (1.5 ±0.3 vs. 1.5 ±0.3, p=0.93), infarct size (18.0±10% vs. 16.8±11%; p=0.29) or LV ejection fraction on CMR (46±8% vs.47±11% in the control group; p=0.86) were comparable. Incidence of all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome and hospital admission for heart failure at six months follow up was similar between the groups (sonothrombolysis: 2, control: 5).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In STEMI patients with persistent ST-elevation after PCI, post-PCI sonothrombolysis did not result in more ST-resolution or smaller infarct size compared to control subjects. The incidence of the combined clinical endpoints was remarkably low in this high-risk patient population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38972613
pii: S0894-7317(24)00346-8
doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2024.06.018
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Soufiane El Kadi (S)

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: s.elkadi@amsterdamumc.nl.

Mariëlle C van de Veerdonk (MC)

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Eva M Spoormans (EM)

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Niels J W Verouden (NJW)

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Shouqiang Li (S)

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Omaha, NE, United States.

Feng Xie (F)

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Omaha, NE, United States.

Luciene Ferreira Azevedo (LF)

Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo, Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.

Wilson Mathias (W)

Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo, Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.

Albert C van Rossum (AC)

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Thomas R Porter (TR)

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Omaha, NE, United States.

Otto Kamp (O)

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH