A phase I thorough QT/QTc study evaluating therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of avacopan in healthy participants.
Journal
Clinical and translational science
ISSN: 1752-8062
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101474067
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Jul 2024
Historique:
revised:
12
06
2024
received:
15
02
2024
accepted:
18
06
2024
medline:
8
7
2024
pubmed:
8
7
2024
entrez:
8
7
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This phase I thorough QTc, double-blind, randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled, parallel group, multiple-dose study evaluated avacopan's effect on cardiac repolarization using concentration-QTc (C-QTc) as the primary analysis. Avacopan 30 mg b.i.d. (therapeutic dose) was administered orally on days 1 through 7 followed by avacopan 100 mg b.i.d. (supratherapeutic dose) on days 8 through 14 in 29 healthy participants. Moxifloxacin 400 mg and placebo were administered on days 1 and 15 in a nested crossover design for assay sensitivity in separate cohorts to 28 participants. Time-matched plasma concentrations and up to 10 replicate ECGs were obtained on prespecified days at baseline and postdose on days 1, 7, 14, and 15. The mean change from baseline on QTcF for avacopan (-5.5 to 3.5 ms) was similar to placebo (-6.9 to 1.4 ms) across days 1, 7, and 14. The mean effect on ΔΔQTcF (90% CI) was estimated as 1.5 ms (-0.17 to 3.09) and 0.8 ms (-2.41 to 4.05) for 30 and 100 mg avacopan b.i.d. treatments, respectively. Based on the C-QTc analysis, avacopan's effect on ΔΔQTcF >10 ms can be excluded within the observed plasma concentration range of up to ~1220 and ~335 ng/mL for avacopan and active major metabolite, M1, respectively. The estimated population slopes showed a shallow relationship, which was not statistically significant. There was no clinically meaningful effect of avacopan on heart rate or cardiac conduction (PR and QRS intervals). Avacopan appeared to be generally well tolerated in this study population.
Substances chimiques
Moxifloxacin
U188XYD42P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13878Informations de copyright
© 2024 Amgen Inc. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Références
Jayne DRW, Merkel PA, Schall TJ, Bekker P. Avacopan for the treatment of ANCA‐associated vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:599‐609.
Bekker P, Dairaghi D, Seitz L, et al. Characterization of pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties of CCX168, a potent and selective orally administered complement 5a receptor inhibitor, based on preclinical evaluation and randomized phase 1 clinical study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164646.
Avacopan prescribing information (United States) website. Accessed April 22, 2024. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/214487s000lbl.pdf
European Medicines Agency: Tavneos website. Accessed on April 22, 2024. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/tavneos
ICH Harmonised tripartite guideline: The clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for nonantiarrhythmic drugs E14 website. Accessed April 22, 2024. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E14_Guideline.pdf
Roden DM. Drug‐induced prolongation of the QT interval. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1013‐1022.
E14 Implementation Working Group: ICH E14 Guideline: The clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non‐antiarrhythmic drugs: Questions & answers (R3) website. Accessed April 22, 2024. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E14_Q%26As_R3_Q%26As.pdf
Florian JA, Tornoe CW, Brundage R, Parekh A, Garnett CE. Population pharmacokinetic and concentration—QTc models for moxifloxacin: pooled analysis of 20 thorough QT studies. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;51:1152‐1162.
Garnett C, Bonate PL, Dang Q, et al. Scientific white paper on concentration‐QTc modeling. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2018;45:383‐397.
Darpo B. The thorough QT/QTc study 4 years after the implementation of the ICH E14 guidance. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;159:49‐57.
Darpo B, Benson C, Dota C, et al. Results from the IQ‐CSRC prospective study support replacement of the thorough QT study by QT assessment in the early clinical phase. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;97:326‐335.
Ferber G, Zhou M, Darpo B. Detection of QTc effects in small studies‐implications for replacing the thorough QT study. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2014;20:368‐377.
E14 Clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non‐antiarrhythmic drugs website. Accessed April 22, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory‐information/search‐fda‐guidance‐documents/e14‐clinical‐evaluation‐qtqtc‐interval‐prolongation‐and‐proarrhythmic‐potential‐non‐antiarrhythmic‐0
Mu S, Darpo B, Tang Z, et al. No QTc prolongation with zanubrutinib: results of concentration‐QTc analysis from a thorough QT study in healthy subjects. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13:923‐931.
Hossain M, Zhou M, Tiffany C, Dumont E, Darpo B. A phase I, randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐ and Moxifloxacin‐controlled, four‐period crossover study to evaluate the effect of gepotidacin on cardiac conduction as assessed by 12‐Lead electrocardiogram in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e02385‐16.
Borin MT, Barnes CN, Darpo B, Pendyala S, Xue H, Bourdet DL. Revefenacin, a long‐acting muscarinic antagonist, does not prolong QT interval in healthy subjects: results of a placebo‐ and positive‐controlled thorough QT study. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2020;9:130‐139.