The cost-effectiveness of integrating simplified HCV testing into HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and treatment services among men who have sex with men in Taiwan.

HIV oral-pre-exposure prophylaxis Hepatitis C Integrated services Men who have sex with men Point-of-care testing

Journal

The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific
ISSN: 2666-6065
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health West Pac
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101774968

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 05 02 2024
revised: 09 05 2024
accepted: 29 05 2024
medline: 8 7 2024
pubmed: 8 7 2024
entrez: 8 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Simplified hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing integrated into existing HIV services has the potential to improve HCV diagnoses and treatment. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of integrating different simplified HCV testing strategies into existing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and treatment services among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Taiwan. Mathematical modeling was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of integrating simplified HCV tests (point-of-care antibody, reflex RNA, or immediate point-of-care RNA) with HCV treatment into existing HIV prevention and care for MSM from a healthcare perspective. The impact of increasing PrEP and HIV treatment coverage among MSM in combination with these HCV testing strategies was also considered. We reported lifetime costs (2022 US dollars) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with a 3% annual discounting rate. Point-of-care HCV antibody and reflex RNA testing are cost-effective compared to current HCV testing in all PrEP and HIV treatment coverage scenarios (ICERs <$32,811/QALY gained). Immediate point-of-care RNA testing would be only cost-effective compared to the current HCV testing if coverage of HIV services remained unchanged. Point-of-care antibody testing in an unchanged HIV services coverage scenario and all simplified HCV testing strategies in scenarios that increased both HIV PrEP and treatment coverage form an efficient frontier, indicating best value for money strategies. Our findings support the integration of simplified HCV testing and people-centered services for MSM and highlight the economic benefits of integrating simplified HCV testing into existing services for MSM alongside HIV PrEP and treatment. This study was made possible as part of a research-funded PhD being undertaken by HJW under the UNSW Sydney Scientia scholarship and was associated with the Rapid Point of Care Research Consortium for infectious disease in the Asia Pacific (RAPID), which is funded by an NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence. JG is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant (1176131).

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Simplified hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing integrated into existing HIV services has the potential to improve HCV diagnoses and treatment. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of integrating different simplified HCV testing strategies into existing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and treatment services among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Taiwan.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Mathematical modeling was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of integrating simplified HCV tests (point-of-care antibody, reflex RNA, or immediate point-of-care RNA) with HCV treatment into existing HIV prevention and care for MSM from a healthcare perspective. The impact of increasing PrEP and HIV treatment coverage among MSM in combination with these HCV testing strategies was also considered. We reported lifetime costs (2022 US dollars) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with a 3% annual discounting rate.
Findings UNASSIGNED
Point-of-care HCV antibody and reflex RNA testing are cost-effective compared to current HCV testing in all PrEP and HIV treatment coverage scenarios (ICERs <$32,811/QALY gained). Immediate point-of-care RNA testing would be only cost-effective compared to the current HCV testing if coverage of HIV services remained unchanged. Point-of-care antibody testing in an unchanged HIV services coverage scenario and all simplified HCV testing strategies in scenarios that increased both HIV PrEP and treatment coverage form an efficient frontier, indicating best value for money strategies.
Interpretation UNASSIGNED
Our findings support the integration of simplified HCV testing and people-centered services for MSM and highlight the economic benefits of integrating simplified HCV testing into existing services for MSM alongside HIV PrEP and treatment.
Funding UNASSIGNED
This study was made possible as part of a research-funded PhD being undertaken by HJW under the UNSW Sydney Scientia scholarship and was associated with the Rapid Point of Care Research Consortium for infectious disease in the Asia Pacific (RAPID), which is funded by an NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence. JG is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant (1176131).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38974907
doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101119
pii: S2666-6065(24)00113-5
pmc: PMC11227020
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101119

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

RTG has received funding for his research from WHO and has provided non-funded project advice to Gilead and ViiV. JG is a consultant/advisor and has received research grants from AbbVie, Abbott, Cepheid, Gilead Sciences, Hologic and Roche and has received honoraria from AbbVie, Abbott, Cepheid, Gilead Sciences, and Roche. TLA has received research grants from Cepheid, Abbott, Gilead, and SpeeDx, has received travel support to attend a conference from Abbot. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Huei-Jiuan Wu (HJ)

The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Tanya L Applegate (TL)

The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Jisoo A Kwon (JA)

The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Evan B Cunningham (EB)

The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Jason Grebely (J)

The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Richard T Gray (RT)

The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Sophy T F Shih (STF)

The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Classifications MeSH