Algorithmic crime prevention. From abstract police to precision policing.

Abstract police crime prevention precision policing predictive policing

Journal

Policing & society
ISSN: 1043-9463
Titre abrégé: Policing Soc
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101633454

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
medline: 8 7 2024
pubmed: 8 7 2024
entrez: 8 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The growing digitisation in our society also affects policing, which tends to make use of increasingly refined algorithmic tools based on abstract technologies. But the abstraction of technology, we argue, does not necessarily entail an increase in abstraction of police work. This paper contrasts the 'abstract police' debate with an analysis of police practices that use digital technologies to achieve greater precision. While the notion of abstract police assumes that computerisation distances police officers from their community, our empirical investigation of a geo-analysis unit in a German Land Office of Criminal Investigation shows that the adoption of abstract procedures does not by itself imply a detachment from local reference and community contact. What we call contextual reference can be productively combined with the impersonality and anonymity of algorithmic procedures, leading also to more effective and focused forms of collaboration with local entities. On the basis of our empirical results, we suggest a more nuanced understanding of the digitalisation of police work. Rather than leading to a progressive estrangement from the community of reference, the use of digital techniques can enable experimentation with innovative forms of 'precision policing', particularly in the field of crime prevention.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38974932
doi: 10.1080/10439463.2024.2326516
pii: 2326516
pmc: PMC11225944
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

521-534

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Auteurs

Simon Egbert (S)

Faculty of Sociology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Elena Esposito (E)

Faculty of Sociology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Classifications MeSH