Does commonly used femoral components of total knee arthroplasty fit well in the Indian population?

Anthropometry of distal femur Distal femur dimensions Indian femur Indian population femur Knee arthroplasty Total knee arthroplasty

Journal

Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 11 01 2024
revised: 29 03 2024
accepted: 05 06 2024
pmc-release: 07 06 2025
medline: 8 7 2024
pubmed: 8 7 2024
entrez: 8 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

20 % of patients remain dissatisfied post-Total Knee Arthroplasty. We intend to find the correlation between sizes of commonly used femoral components and morphometric data of distal femur in Indian population. Prospective observational study in 178 knees (178 individuals) was conducted on Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans (Axial section). The anteroposterior dimension at intercondylar notch (AP), anteroposterior dimension on the medial (MAP) and lateral (LAP) femoral condyle, total mediolateral width (ML), width of medial condyle (MLM), lateral condyle (MLL) and intercondylar distance (ICD) and aspect ratio (AR) were measured on males and females separately. These measurements were then analyzed keeping in view the available sizes of three latest knee arthroplasty systems (Attune CR, Next Gen II, Genesis II) to look for correlation and best fitting system. On observation between values of male and female femur, a significant difference was seen in all the parameters (p-value<0.0001) except ICD (p-value 0.6591). On scatter plots, Attune was found to be nearer to the line of best fit compared to other two implant companies in both males and females. Outliers were highest in cases of NextGen II (45 % in males and 46 % in females) whereas it was lowest in the case of Attune (12.5 %in males and 41 % in females). Attune CR was seen to fit best in the Indian population followed by Genesis II and NextGen II. These femoral implants are designed as per the sizes of the Western population and the Caucasians are oversized for the Indian subcontinent, especially female patients, thus needing improvement in design/sizes. III.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
20 % of patients remain dissatisfied post-Total Knee Arthroplasty. We intend to find the correlation between sizes of commonly used femoral components and morphometric data of distal femur in Indian population.
Materials and methods UNASSIGNED
Prospective observational study in 178 knees (178 individuals) was conducted on Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans (Axial section). The anteroposterior dimension at intercondylar notch (AP), anteroposterior dimension on the medial (MAP) and lateral (LAP) femoral condyle, total mediolateral width (ML), width of medial condyle (MLM), lateral condyle (MLL) and intercondylar distance (ICD) and aspect ratio (AR) were measured on males and females separately. These measurements were then analyzed keeping in view the available sizes of three latest knee arthroplasty systems (Attune CR, Next Gen II, Genesis II) to look for correlation and best fitting system.
Results UNASSIGNED
On observation between values of male and female femur, a significant difference was seen in all the parameters (p-value<0.0001) except ICD (p-value 0.6591). On scatter plots, Attune was found to be nearer to the line of best fit compared to other two implant companies in both males and females. Outliers were highest in cases of NextGen II (45 % in males and 46 % in females) whereas it was lowest in the case of Attune (12.5 %in males and 41 % in females).
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Attune CR was seen to fit best in the Indian population followed by Genesis II and NextGen II. These femoral implants are designed as per the sizes of the Western population and the Caucasians are oversized for the Indian subcontinent, especially female patients, thus needing improvement in design/sizes.
Level of evidence UNASSIGNED
III.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38975296
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102436
pii: S0976-5662(24)00105-X
pmc: PMC11222790
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

102436

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Shivam Bansal (S)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Mohit Dhingra (M)

Department of Orthopedics, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.

Roop Bhushan Kalia (RB)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Sonal Saran (S)

Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Saptarshi Barman (S)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Arghya Kundu Choudhury (AK)

Department of Orthopaedics, ESIC, Faridabad, India.

Anil Regmi (A)

Department of Orthopedics, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.

Bishwa Bandhu Niraula (BB)

Department of Orthopedics, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.

Classifications MeSH