Sinus membrane thickness of healthy endodontically treated maxillary molars.
apical foramen
endodontic treatment
maxillary molar
maxillary sinus
sinus membrane thickness
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jul 2024
08 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
16
04
2024
accepted:
28
06
2024
medline:
8
7
2024
pubmed:
8
7
2024
entrez:
8
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The study aimed to investigate the sinus membrane thickness (SMT) adjacent to healthy endodontically-treated maxillary molars with or without protruded apical foramen into the sinus cavity using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Images of 207 non-smoker patients aged 18-40 were retrospectively analyzed, 140 were endodontically treated, and 136 were without endodontic treatment. Patients with any sinus pathology, teeth that have symptoms, or poor root filling were excluded. Study groups consisted of Group EM-I (endodontically treated and protruded apical foramen), Group EM-C (endodontically treated and contacted apical foramen), and similarly without endodontic treatment; Group M-I and Group M-C. SMT upon the mesial, distal, and palatal roots was measured. One-way ANOVA and Student's t-tests were performed. Group EM-I had the thickest sinus membrane compared to other groups (p = 0.013). SMT values were 2.37-2.60 mm in Group EM-I, and 1.34-1.58 mm in other groups. Thickening (> 2 mm) percentages were 33.45% in Group EM-I and between 4.25 and 8.25% in other groups. No statistical difference was detected between first and second molars and genders (p > 0.05). When the apical foramen protruded into the sinus cavity, the conventional root canal treatment caused a minimal (between 2.37 mm and 2.60 mm) sinus membrane thickening with a rate of 33.45% based upon CBCT examinations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38976053
doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05815-y
pii: 10.1007/s00784-024-05815-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
418Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Van Den Munckhof T, Patel S, Koller G, Berkhout E, Mannocci F, Foschi (2020) F Schneiderian membrane thickness variation following endodontic procedures: a retrospective cone beam computed tomography study. BMC Oral Health 20(1):1–8
Garcia-Font M, Abella F, Patel S, Rodríguez M, González Sanchez JA, Duran-Sindreu F (2020) Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis to Detect the Association between primary and Secondary Endodontic Infections and mucosal thickness of Maxillary Sinus. J Endod 46(9):1235–1240
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.015
pubmed: 32512066
Vitali FC, Santos PS, Massignan C, Maia LC, Cardoso M, da Silveira Teixeira C (2023) Global prevalence of maxillary sinusitis of odontogenic origin and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 49:369–381
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.01.010
pubmed: 36754253
Shahbazian M, Vandewoude C, Wyatt J, Jacobs R (2014) Comparative assessment of panoramic radiography and CBCT imaging for radiodiagnostics in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Investig 18:293–300
doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0963-x
pubmed: 23525890
Bornstein MM, Wasmer J, Sendi P et al (2012) Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane and apical bone in maxillary molars referred for apical surgery: a comparative radiographic analysis using limited cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 38:51–57
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.023
pubmed: 22152620
Rege ICC, Sousa TO, Leles CR, Mendonc¸a EF (2012) Occurrence of maxillary sinus abnormalities detected by cone beam CT in asymptomatic patients. BMC Oral Health 12:30
doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-30
pubmed: 22883529
pmcid: 3511216
Ramanauskaite A, Ataman-Duruel ET, Duruel O, Tözüm MD, Yildirim TT, Tözüm TF (2019) Effects of clinical local factors on thickness and morphology of Schneiderian membrane: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 21(4):715–722
doi: 10.1111/cid.12807
pubmed: 31172673
Alghofaily M, Alsufyani N, Althumairy RI, AlSuhaibani A, Alfawzan F, AlSadhan L (2023) Odontogenic Factors Associated with Maxillary Sinus Schneiderian membrane thickness and their relationship to chronic sinonasal symptoms: an ambispective cohort study. Diagnostics (Basel) 13(16):2710
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13162710
pubmed: 37627969
Huang YT, Hu SW, Huang JY, Chang YC (2021) Assessment of relationship between maxillary sinus membrane thickening and the adjacent teeth health by cone-beam computed tomography. J Dent Sci 16(1):275–279
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.002
pubmed: 33384809
Lim HC, Nam JY, Cha JK, Lee JS, Lee DW, Jung UW, Choi SH (2017) Retrospective analysis of sinus membrane thickening: Profile, causal factors, and its influence on complications. Implant Dent 26(6):868–874
doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000667
pubmed: 29053486
Ribeiro DM, Réus JC, Felippe WT, Pachêco-Pereira C, Dutra KL, Santos JN, De Luca Canto G (2018) Technical quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using hand instrumentation: a meta‐analysis. Int Endod J 51(3):269–283
doi: 10.1111/iej.12853
pubmed: 28862763
Ørstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM (1986) The periapical index: a scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis. Endod Dent Traumatol 2:20–34
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00119.x
pubmed: 3457698
Castro LO, Castro IO, de Alencar AHG, Valladares-Neto J, Estrela C (2016) Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of distance from cementoenamel junction to alveolar crest before and after nonextraction orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 86(4):543–549
doi: 10.2319/040815-235.1
pubmed: 26379114
Lu Y, Liu Z, Zhang L et al (2012) Associations between maxillary sinus mucosal thickening and apical periodontitis using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a retrospective study. J Endod 38(8):1069–1074
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.027
pubmed: 22794207
Goller-Bulut D, Sekerci AE, Köse E, Sisman Y (2015) Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars to detect the relationship between periapical and marginal bone loss and mucosal thickness of maxillary sinus. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 20(5):e572–e579
doi: 10.4317/medoral.20587
pubmed: 26241459
pmcid: 4598926
Phothikhun S, Suphanantachat S, Chuenchompoonut V, Nisapakultorn K (2012) Cone-beam computed tomographic evidence of the association between periodontal bone loss and mucosal thickening of the maxillary sinus. J Periodontol 83(5):557–564
doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110376
pubmed: 21910593
Dummer PM, McGinn JH, Rees DG (1984) The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J 17(4):192–198
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1984.tb00404.x
pubmed: 6593303
Slaughter RJ, Watts M, Vale JA, Grieve JR, Schep LJ (2019) The clinical toxicology of sodium hypochlorite. Clin Toxicol 57(5):303–311
doi: 10.1080/15563650.2018.1543889
Eid AA, Nikonov SY, Looney SW, Didato A, Niu LN, Levin MD, Tay FR (2013) In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a root canal filling material that expands on water sorption. J Endod 39(7):883–888
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.03.003
pubmed: 23791256
Ritter L, Lutz J, Neugebauer J et al (2011) Prevalence of pathologic findings in the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 111:634–640
doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.12.007
pubmed: 21444226
Khorramdel A, Shirmohammadi A, Sadighi A et al (2017) Association between demographic and radiographic characteristics of the Schneiderian membrane and periapical and periodontal diseases using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a retrospective study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 11(3):170–176
doi: 10.15171/joddd.2017.031
pubmed: 29184633
pmcid: 5666217
Zimmo N, Insua A, Sinjab K, Chan HL, Shaikh L, Wang HL (2018) Impact of sex, age, and season on sinus membrane thickness. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 33(1):175–180. 423.Pope O, Sathorn C, Parashos P (2014) A comparative investigation of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of a healthy periapex. J Endod 40(3):360–365
doi: 10.11607/jomi.5924
pubmed: 29028853
Nunes CA, Guedes OA, Alencar AH, Peters OA, Estrela CR, Estrela C (2016) Evaluation of Periapical Lesions and Their Association with Maxillary Sinus abnormalities on Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic images. J Endod 42(1):42–46
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.09.014
pubmed: 26521148
Wen SC, Lin YH, Yang YC, Wang HL (2015) The influence of sinus membrane thickness upon membrane perforation during transcrestal sinus lift procedure. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:1158–1164
doi: 10.1111/clr.12429
pubmed: 24891094
Kang SH, Kim BS, Kim Y (2015) Proximity of posterior teeth to the Maxillary Sinus and Buccal Bone thickness: a biometric Assessment using cone-beam computed Tomography. J Endod 41:1839–1846
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.011
pubmed: 26411520
Pagin O, Centurion BS, Rubira-Bullen IRF, Capelozza ALA (2013) Maxillary sinus and posterior teeth: accessing close relationship by cone-beam computed tomographic scanning in a Brazilian population. J Endod 39:748–751
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.014
pubmed: 23683273
Chan HL, Suarez F, Monje A, Benavides E, Wang HL (2014) Evaluation of maxillary sinus width on cone-beam computed tomography for sinus augmentation and new sinus classification based on sinus width. Clin Oral Implants Res 25(6):647–652
doi: 10.1111/clr.12055
pubmed: 23043676
Kwak HH, Park HD, Yoon HR, Kang MK, Koh KS, Kim HJ (2004) Topographic anatomy of the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus in koreans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33(4):382–388
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.012
pubmed: 15145042
Duncan HF, Nagendrababu V, El-Karim IA, Dummer PM (2021) Outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of endodontic treatment for pulpitis and apical periodontitis for use in the development of European Society of Endodontology (ESE) S3 level clinical practice guidelines: a protocol. Int Endod J 54(5):646–654
doi: 10.1111/iej.13501
pubmed: 33630330