The cost-effectiveness of germline BRCA testing in metastatic prostate cancer followed by cascade testing of first-degree relatives of mutation carriers.

BRCA cascade testing genetic testing germline testing metastatic prostate cancer

Journal

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
ISSN: 1524-4733
Titre abrégé: Value Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100883818

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 10 02 2024
revised: 25 06 2024
accepted: 27 06 2024
medline: 9 7 2024
pubmed: 9 7 2024
entrez: 8 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients with BRCA mutations benefit from targeted treatments (e.g., olaparib). Additionally, family members of affected patients have increased risk of hereditary cancers and benefit from early detection and prevention. International guidelines recommend genetic testing in mPCa, however, the value for money of testing mPCa patients and cascade testing of blood-related family members has not been assessed. In this context we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of germline BRCA testing in mPCa patients followed by cascade testing of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of mutation carriers. We conducted a cost-utility analysis of germline BRCA testing using two scenarios: 1) testing mPCa patients only; 2) testing mPCa patients and first-degree relatives (FDRs) of those who test positive. A semi-Markov multi-health-state transition model was constructed using a lifetime time horizon. The analyses were performed from an Australian payer perspective. Decision uncertainty was characterized using probabilistic analyses. Compared with no testing, BRCA testing in mPCa was associated with an incremental cost of AU$3,731 and a gain of 0.014 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of AU$265,942/QALY. Extending testing to FDRs of variant positive patients resulted in an ICER of AU$16,392/QALY. Probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay of AU$75,000/QALY was 0% in the standalone mPCa analysis and 100% in the cascade testing analysis. BRCA testing when performed as a standalone strategy in patients with mPCa may not be cost-effective but demonstrates significant value for money after the inclusion of cascade testing of FDRs of mutation carriers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38977196
pii: S1098-3015(24)02758-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.06.019
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Srinivas Teppala (S)

Centre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Electronic address: srinivas.teppala@griffithuni.edu.au.

Paul Scuffham (P)

Centre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Kim Edmunds (K)

Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Matthew J Roberts (MJ)

UQ Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

David Fairbairn (D)

Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

David P Smith (DP)

The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Lisa Horvath (L)

Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Clinical Prostate Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Haitham Tuffaha (H)

Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Classifications MeSH