Access to personalised dementia care planning in primary care: a mixed methods evaluation of the PriDem intervention.
Humans
Dementia
/ therapy
Primary Health Care
/ organization & administration
England
Male
Female
Patient Care Planning
/ organization & administration
Aged
Qualitative Research
Feasibility Studies
Caregivers
Precision Medicine
/ methods
Aged, 80 and over
Health Services Accessibility
/ organization & administration
Middle Aged
Dementia
Patient-Centered Care
Primary Health Care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jul 2024
08 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline:
9
7
2024
pubmed:
9
7
2024
entrez:
8
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Provision of personalised care planning is a national priority for people with dementia. Research suggests a lack of quality and consistency of care plans and reviews. The PriDem model of care was developed to deliver feasible and acceptable primary care-based postdiagnostic dementia care. We aimed to increase the adoption of personalised care planning for people with dementia, exploring implementation facilitators and barriers. Mixed-method feasibility and implementation study. Seven general practices from four primary care networks (PCNs) in the Northeast and Southeast of England. A medical records audit collected data on 179 community-dwelling people with dementia preintervention, and 215 during the intervention year. The qualitative study recruited 26 health and social care professionals, 14 people with dementia and 16 carers linked to participating practices. Clinical dementia leads (CDL) delivered a 12-month, systems-level intervention in participating PCNs, to develop care systems, build staff capacity and capability, and deliver tailored care and support to people with dementia and their carers. Adoption of personalised care planning was assessed through a preintervention and postintervention audit of medical records. Implementation barriers and facilitators were explored through semistructured qualitative interviews and non-participant observation, analysed using codebook thematic analysis informed by Normalisation Process Theory. The proportion of personalised care plans increased from 37.4% (95% CI 30.3% to 44.5%) preintervention to 64.7% (95% CI 58.3% to 71.0%) in the intervention year. Qualitative findings suggest that the flexible nature of the PriDem intervention enabled staff to overcome contextual barriers through harnessing the skills of the wider multidisciplinary team, delivering increasingly holistic care to patients. Meaningful personalised care planning can be achieved through a team-based approach. Although improved guidelines for care planning are required, commissioners should consider the benefits of a CDL-led approach. ISRCTN11677384.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38977367
pii: bmjopen-2023-082083
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082083
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e082083Investigateurs
Alistair Burns
(A)
Emily Evans
(E)
Derek King
(D)
Martin Knapp
(M)
Revd Doug Lewins
(RD)
Sube Banerjee
(S)
Jill Manthorpe
(J)
Louise Allen
(L)
Sue Tucker
(S)
Raphael Wittenberg
(R)
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.