Improving student diet and food security in higher education using participatory and co-creation approaches: a systematic review.
Co-creation
Intervention
Participatory approach
Students in higher education
Systematic review
Young adults
Journal
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
ISSN: 1479-5868
Titre abrégé: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101217089
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jul 2024
08 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
04
03
2024
accepted:
05
06
2024
medline:
9
7
2024
pubmed:
9
7
2024
entrez:
8
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Higher education students are an important target group for public health nutrition interventions. When designing tailored and contextually relevant interventions, participatory and co-creation approaches are increasingly recognized as promising but their use and effectiveness has not been assessed in this type of population. We systematically reviewed interventions aiming to improve dietary quality and/or food security in higher education settings with the aims 1) to identify and describe their participatory and co-creation approaches and 2) to compare the effectiveness of interventions using or not using participatory and co-creation approaches. Our search in PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, EMBASE was performed in January 2023 and yielded 3658 unique records, out of which 42 articles (66 interventions) were included. Effectiveness of interventions was assessed at the individual level (longitudinal evaluations) or at the group level (repeated cross-sectional evaluations). A five-level classification was used to describe a continuum of engagement from students and other partners in the intervention design and implementation: no participation (level one), consultation, co-production, co-design and co-creation (levels two to five). To synthetize effectiveness, comparisons were made between studies without participation (level one) or with participation (levels two-five). Ten (24%) out of 42 studies used a participatory and co-creation approach (levels two-five). Studies using a participatory and co-creation approach reported a positive finding on individual-level outcome (i.e. overall diet quality or food group intake or food security) in 5/13 (38%) intervention arms (vs 13/31 or 42% for those without participation). Studies using a participatory and co-creation approach reported a positive finding on group-level outcomes (i.e. food choices in campus food outlets) in 4/7 (57%) (vs 8/23 or 35% in those without participation). Participatory and co-creation approaches may improve the effectiveness of nutrition interventions in higher education settings but the level of evidence remains very limited. More research is warranted to identify best co-creation practices when designing, implementing and evaluating nutritional interventions in the higher education setting. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023393004.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Higher education students are an important target group for public health nutrition interventions. When designing tailored and contextually relevant interventions, participatory and co-creation approaches are increasingly recognized as promising but their use and effectiveness has not been assessed in this type of population. We systematically reviewed interventions aiming to improve dietary quality and/or food security in higher education settings with the aims 1) to identify and describe their participatory and co-creation approaches and 2) to compare the effectiveness of interventions using or not using participatory and co-creation approaches.
METHODS
METHODS
Our search in PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, EMBASE was performed in January 2023 and yielded 3658 unique records, out of which 42 articles (66 interventions) were included. Effectiveness of interventions was assessed at the individual level (longitudinal evaluations) or at the group level (repeated cross-sectional evaluations). A five-level classification was used to describe a continuum of engagement from students and other partners in the intervention design and implementation: no participation (level one), consultation, co-production, co-design and co-creation (levels two to five). To synthetize effectiveness, comparisons were made between studies without participation (level one) or with participation (levels two-five).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Ten (24%) out of 42 studies used a participatory and co-creation approach (levels two-five). Studies using a participatory and co-creation approach reported a positive finding on individual-level outcome (i.e. overall diet quality or food group intake or food security) in 5/13 (38%) intervention arms (vs 13/31 or 42% for those without participation). Studies using a participatory and co-creation approach reported a positive finding on group-level outcomes (i.e. food choices in campus food outlets) in 4/7 (57%) (vs 8/23 or 35% in those without participation).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Participatory and co-creation approaches may improve the effectiveness of nutrition interventions in higher education settings but the level of evidence remains very limited. More research is warranted to identify best co-creation practices when designing, implementing and evaluating nutritional interventions in the higher education setting.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
PROSPERO registration number CRD42023393004.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38978008
doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01613-7
pii: 10.1186/s12966-024-01613-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
71Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1958–72.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8
Winpenny EM, van Sluijs EMF, White M, Klepp KI, Wold B, Lien N. Changes in diet through adolescence and early adulthood: longitudinal trajectories and association with key life transitions. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15(1):86.
pubmed: 30200990
pmcid: 6131755
doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0719-8
Deliens T, Clarys P, Van Hecke L, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B. Changes in weight and body composition during the first semester at university A prospective explanatory study. Appetite. 2013;65:111–6.
pubmed: 23402710
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.024
Maillet MA, Grouzet FME. Understanding changes in eating behavior during the transition to university from a self-determination theory perspective: a systematic review. J Am Coll Health. 2021;71(2):422–39.
pubmed: 34292133
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1891922
Crombie AP, Ilich JZ, Dutton GR, Panton LB, Abood DA. The freshman weight gain phenomenon revisited. Nutr Rev. 2009;67(2):83–94.
pubmed: 19178649
doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00143.x
FAO. Declaration on World Food Security. World Food Summit. Rome: FAO (1996). Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/w3613e/w3613e00.htm . Cited 2023 Sep 11.
Loofbourrow BM, Scherr RE. Food insecurity in higher education: a contemporary review of impacts and explorations of solutions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(10):5884.
pubmed: 37239614
pmcid: 10217872
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105884
Hickey A, Brown O, Fiagbor R. Campus-based Interventions and Strategies to Address College Students with Food Insecurity: a systematic review. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2023;18(1):81–95.
doi: 10.1080/19320248.2022.2101413
Kendrick A, Fantasia H, Morse B, Willis D. Food insecurity in college students: a concept analysis. Nurs Forum. 2022;57(5):898–904.
pubmed: 35616363
doi: 10.1111/nuf.12737
Nikolaus CJ, An R, Ellison B, Nickols-Richardson SM. Food Insecurity among College Students in the United States: a scoping review. Adv Nutr. 2020;11(2):327–48.
pubmed: 31644787
doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz111
United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Key Statistics & Graphics - Food Security Status of U.S. Households in 2021. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/104656/err-309.pdf . Cited 2024 May 3.
Hilger J, Loerbroks A, Diehl K. Eating behaviour of university students in Germany: Dietary intake, barriers to healthy eating and changes in eating behaviour since the time of matriculation. Appetite. 2017;1(109):100–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.016
Velez-Toral M, Rodriguez-Reinado C, Ramallo-Espinosa A, Andres-Villas M. “It’s Important but, on What Level?”: Healthy cooking meanings and barriers to healthy eating among university students. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2309.
pubmed: 32752041
pmcid: 7468761
doi: 10.3390/nu12082309
Zigmont V, Linsmeier A, Gallup P. Understanding the Why of College Student Food Insecurity. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2021;16(5):595–610.
doi: 10.1080/19320248.2019.1701600
Tseng M, DeGreef K, Fishler M, Gipson R, Koyano K, Neill DB. Assessment of a University Campus Food Environment, California, 2015. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;4(13):E18.
Pulz IS, Martins PA, Feldman C, Veiros MB. Are campus food environments healthy? A novel perspective for qualitatively evaluating the nutritional quality of food sold at foodservice facilities at a Brazilian university. Perspect Public Health. 2017;137(2):122–35.
pubmed: 26980694
doi: 10.1177/1757913916636414
Roy R, Soo D, Conroy D, Wall CR, Swinburn B. Exploring University Food Environment and On-Campus Food Purchasing Behaviors, Preferences, and Opinions. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019;51(7):865–75.
pubmed: 30981657
doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.03.003
Swinburn B, Sacks G, Vandevijvere S, Kumanyika S, Lobstein T, Neal B, et al. INFORMAS (International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support): overview and key principles. Obes Rev. 2013;14(Suppl):1.
pubmed: 24074206
doi: 10.1111/obr.12087
Belogianni K, Baldwin C. Types of interventions targeting dietary, physical activity, and weight-related outcomes among university students: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Adv Nutr. 2019;10(5):848–63.
pubmed: 31181143
pmcid: 6743817
doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz027
Roy R, Kelly B, Rangan A, Allman-Farinelli M. Food environment interventions to improve the dietary behavior of young adults in tertiary education settings: a systematic literature review. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(10):1647–1681.e1.
pubmed: 26271691
doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.06.380
Deliens T, Van Crombruggen R, Verbruggen S, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B, Clarys P. Dietary interventions among university students: A systematic review. Appetite. 2016;105:14–26.
pubmed: 27181201
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.05.003
Whatnall MC, Patterson AJ, Hutchesson MJ. Effectiveness of nutrition interventions in vending machines to encourage the purchase and consumption of healthier food and drinks in the university setting: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2020;12(3):E876.
doi: 10.3390/nu12030876
Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325–50.
pubmed: 18173388
doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.091307.083824
Singh DR, Sah RK, Simkhada B, Darwin Z. Potentials and challenges of using co-design in health services research in low- and middle-income countries. Glob Health Res Policy. 2023;8(1):5.
pubmed: 36915174
pmcid: 10009993
doi: 10.1186/s41256-023-00290-6
Vargas C, Whelan J, Brimblecombe J, Allender S. Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health - a perspective on definition and distinctions. Public Health Res Pract. 2022;32(2):3222211.
pubmed: 35702744
doi: 10.17061/phrp3222211
Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(12):1667–76.
pubmed: 8746866
doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
McCoy MS, Jongsma KR, Friesen P, Dunn M, Neuhaus CP, Rand L, et al. National Standards for Public Involvement in Research: missing the forest for the trees. J Med Ethics. 2018;44(12):801–4.
pubmed: 30337451
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105088
Harting J, Kruithof K, Ruijter L, Stronks K. Participatory research in health promotion: a critical review and illustration of rationales. Health Promot Int. 2022;37(Supplement_2):ii7–20.
pubmed: 35748283
pmcid: 9226656
doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac016
Cook T, Boote J, Buckley N, Vougioukalou S, Wright M. Accessing participatory research impact and legacy: developing the evidence base for participatory approaches in health research. Educ Action Res. 2017;25(4):473–88.
doi: 10.1080/09650792.2017.1326964
Vargas C, Whelan J, Brimblecombe J, Brock J, Christian M, Allender S. Co-creation of healthier food retail environments: a systematic review to explore the type of stakeholders and their motivations and stage of engagement. Obes Rev. 2022;23(9):e13482.
pubmed: 35670030
pmcid: 9540769
doi: 10.1111/obr.13482
Tay BSJ, Cox DN, Brinkworth GD, Davis A, Edney SM, Gwilt I, et al. Co-Design practices in diet and nutrition research: an integrative review. Nutrients. 2021;13(10):3593.
pubmed: 34684593
pmcid: 8540362
doi: 10.3390/nu13103593
Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;7(348):g1687.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687
Biggs S.D. Resource-Poor Farmer Participation in Research: a synthesis of experiences from nine national agricultural research systems. 1989. Available from: https://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll11/id/92/ . Cited 2023 May 30.
Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1(3):176–84.
pubmed: 17163895
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04006.x
Hernandez-Jana S, Huber-Perez T, Palma-Leal X, Guerrero-Ibacache P, Campos-Nunez V, Zavala-Crichton J, et al. Effect of a Single Nutritional Intervention Previous to a Critical Period of Fat Gain in University Students with Overweight and Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(14):5149.
pubmed: 32708831
pmcid: 7400622
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145149
Cameron D, Epton T, Norman P, Sheeran P, Harris PR, Webb TL, et al. A theory-based online health behaviour intervention for new university students (U@Uni: LifeGuide): Results from a repeat randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16(1):555.
pubmed: 26643917
pmcid: 4672536
doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1092-4
Cardenas MK, Benziger CP, Pillay TD, Miranda JJ. The effect of changes in visibility and price on fruit purchasing at a university cafeteria in Lima. Peru Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(15):2742–9.
pubmed: 25434293
doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002730
Seward MW, Block JP, Chatterjee A. A Traffic-Light Label Intervention and Dietary Choices in College Cafeterias. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(10):1808–14.
pubmed: 27552277
pmcid: 5024366
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303301
Walmsley R, Jenkinson D, Saunders I, Howard T, Oyebode O. Choice architecture modifies fruit and vegetable purchasing in a university campus grocery store: time series modelling of a natural experiment. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1149.
pubmed: 30285680
pmcid: 6167822
doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6063-8
Bejar L, Garcia-Perea M, Mesa-Rodriguez P. Evaluation of an Application for Mobile Telephones (e-12HR) to Increase Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in University Students: A Controlled, Randomized and Multicentric Study. Nutrients. 2022;14(19):4196.
pubmed: 36235848
pmcid: 9571971
doi: 10.3390/nu14194196
Blow J, Iii R, Cooper T. A pilot study examining the impact of a brief health education intervention on food choices and exercise in a Latinx college student sample. Appetite. 2022;173:105979.
pubmed: 35245642
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.105979
Brown O, O’Connor L, Savaiano D. Mobile MyPlate: A Pilot Study Using Text Messaging to Provide Nutrition Education and Promote Better Dietary Choices in College Students. J Am Coll Health. 2014;62(5):320–7.
pubmed: 24654921
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2014.899233
Brown DMY, Bray SR, Beatty KR, Kwan MYW. Healthy active living: a residence community-based intervention to increase physical activity and healthy eating during the transition to first-year university. J Am Coll Health. 2014;62(4):234–42.
pubmed: 24499161
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2014.887572
Dost A, Esin M. Effects of the UNI-PAHNP on physical activity and nutrition behaviors in overweight/obese university students in Turkey. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022;58(4):2003–16.
pubmed: 34997635
doi: 10.1111/ppc.13022
Epton T, Norman P, Dadzie A, Harris P, Webb T, Sheeran P, et al. A theory-based online health behaviour intervention for new university students (U@Uni): results from a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:563.
pubmed: 24903620
pmcid: 4067627
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-563
Halperin DT, Laux J, LeFranc-García C, Araujo C, Palacios C. Findings From a Randomized Trial of Weight Gain Prevention Among Overweight Puerto Rican Young Adults. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019;51(2):205–16.
pubmed: 30291016
doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.07.014
Hardan-Khalil K, Costa C, Fisher D. Daily motivational text messages impact on college students’ nutritional awareness and physical activity levels. J Am Coll Health. 2022;70(8):2511–8.
pubmed: 33577424
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1869748
Hayes JF, Balantekin KN, Graham AK, Strube MJ, Bickel WK, Wilfley DE. Implementation intentions for weight loss in college students with overweight and obesity: a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial. Transl Behav Med. 2021;11(2):359–68.
pubmed: 32359068
doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa038
Kattelmann KK, Bredbenner CB, White AA, Greene GW, Hoerr SL, Kidd T, et al. The effects of Young Adults Eating and Active for Health (YEAH): a theory-based Web-delivered intervention. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(6):S27–41.
pubmed: 25457733
doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.007
Krzyzanowski M, Kizakevich P, Duren-Winfield V, Eckhoff R, Hampton J, Carr L, et al. Rams Have Heart, a Mobile App Tracking Activity and Fruit and Vegetable Consumption to Support the Cardiovascular Health of College Students: Development and Usability Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(8):15156.
doi: 10.2196/15156
Lhakhang P, Godinho C, Knoll N, Schwarzer R. A brief intervention increases fruit and vegetable intake. A comparison of two intervention sequences. Appetite. 2014;82:103–10.
pubmed: 25049137
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.014
Meng J, Peng W, Shin SY, Chung M. Online Self-tracking groups to increase fruit and vegetable intake: a small-scale study on mechanisms of group effect on behavior change. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(3):e63.
pubmed: 28264793
pmcid: 5359417
doi: 10.2196/jmir.6537
O’Brien LM, Palfai TP. Efficacy of a brief web-based intervention with and without SMS to enhance healthy eating behaviors among university students. Eat Behav. 2016;23:104–9.
pubmed: 27619174
doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.08.012
Ohtsuki M, Shibata K, Fukuwatari T, Sasaki Y, Nakai K. Randomized controlled trial of educational intervention to increase consumption of vegetables by Japanese university students. Health educ. 2018;118(4):290–303.
doi: 10.1108/HE-12-2017-0070
Patel N, Lakshminarayanan S, Olickal JJ. Effectiveness of nutrition education in improving fruit and vegetable consumption among selected college students in urban Puducherry, South India. A pre-post intervention study. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2022;34(4):243–8.
doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2020-0077
Pope L, Alpaugh M, Trubek A, Skelly J, Harvey J. Beyond Ramen: Investigating Methods to Improve Food Agency among College Students. Nutrients. 2021;13(5):1674.
pubmed: 34069308
pmcid: 8156074
doi: 10.3390/nu13051674
Quintiliani L, Whiteley J. Results of a Nutrition and Physical Activity Peer Counseling Intervention among Nontraditional College Students. J Cancer Educ. 2016;31(2):366–74.
pubmed: 25994357
pmcid: 4655196
doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0858-4
Sandrick J, Tracy D, Eliasson A, Roth A, Bartel J, Simko M, et al. Effect of a counseling session bolstered by text messaging on self-selected health behaviors in college students: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(5):e67.
pubmed: 28526664
pmcid: 5451640
doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6638
Schroeter C, Corder T, Brookes B, Reller V. An incentive-based health program using MyPlate: a pilot study analyzing college students? dietary intake behavior. J Am Coll Health. 2021;69(3):252–9.
pubmed: 31566483
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1661845
Schweitzer A, Ross J, Klein C, Lei K, Mackey E. An Electronic Wellness Program to Improve Diet and Exercise in College Students: A Pilot Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(1):e29.
pubmed: 26929118
pmcid: 4791526
doi: 10.2196/resprot.4855
Shahril MR, Wan Dali WPE, Lua PL. A 10-Week Multimodal Nutrition Education Intervention Improves Dietary Intake among University Students: Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. J Nutr Metab. 2013;2013:658642.
pubmed: 24069535
pmcid: 3771440
doi: 10.1155/2013/658642
Wang M, Guo Y, Zhang Y, Xie S, Yu Z, Luo J, et al. Promoting healthy lifestyle in Chinese college students: evaluation of a social media-based intervention applying the RE-AIM framework. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021;75(2):335–44.
pubmed: 32366994
doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-0643-2
Whatnall M, Patterson A, Chiu S, Oldmeadow C, Hutchesson M. Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of the Eating Advice to Students (EATS) Brief Web-Based Nutrition Intervention for Young Adult University Students: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 2019;11(4):905.
pubmed: 31018565
pmcid: 6520699
doi: 10.3390/nu11040905
Deliens T, Deforche B, Annemans L, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Clarys P. Effectiveness of pricing strategies on French fries and fruit purchases among university students: results from an on-campus restaurant experiment. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(11):e0165298.
pubmed: 27812123
pmcid: 5094693
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165298
Dingman DA, Schulz MR, Wyrick DL, Bibeau DL, Gupta SN. Does providing nutrition information at vending machines reduce calories per item sold? J Public Health Policy. 2015;36(1):110–22.
pubmed: 25209536
doi: 10.1057/jphp.2014.38
Lambert L, Mann G, Knight S, Partacz M, Jurss M, Eady M. Impact of Smart Snacks Intervention on College Students’ Vending Selections. J Am Coll Health. 2023;71(3):952–8.
pubmed: 33798023
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1909048
Mistura M, Fetterly N, Rhodes R, Tomlin D, Naylor P. Examining the Efficacy of a "Feasible’ Nudge Intervention to Increase the Purchase of Vegetables by First Year University Students (17–19 Years of Age) in British Columbia: A Pilot Study. Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1786.
pubmed: 31382395
pmcid: 6722732
doi: 10.3390/nu11081786
Policastro P, Smith Z, Chapman G. Put the healthy item first: Order of ingredient listing influences consumer selection. J Health Psychol. 2017;22(7):853–63.
pubmed: 26672109
doi: 10.1177/1359105315617328
Policastro P, Palm T, Schwartz J, Chapman G. Targeted calorie message promotes healthy beverage consumption better than charity incentive. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017;25(8):1428–34.
pubmed: 28646548
doi: 10.1002/oby.21885
Schindler-Ruwisch J, Gordon M. Nudging healthy college dining hall choices using behavioral economics. J Am Coll Health. 2021;69(7):697–703.
pubmed: 32027234
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1705842
Turnwald BP, Bertoldo JD, Perry MA, Policastro P, Timmons M, Bosso C, et al. Increasing Vegetable Intake by Emphasizing Tasty and Enjoyable Attributes: A Randomized Controlled Multisite Intervention for Taste-Focused Labeling. Psychol Sci. 2019;30(11):1603–15.
pubmed: 31577177
pmcid: 6843749
doi: 10.1177/0956797619872191
van den Bogerd N, Peppelenbos H, Leufkens R, Seidell JC, Maas J, Dijkstra SC. A free-produce stand on campus: impact on fruit and vegetable intake in Dutch university students. Public Health Nutr. 2020;23(5):924–34.
pubmed: 31937380
pmcid: 10200674
doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003574
Vermote M, Nys J, Versele V, D’Hondt E, Deforche B, Clarys P, et al. The effect of nudges aligned with the renewed Flemish Food Triangle on the purchase of fresh fruits: An on-campus restaurant experiment. Appetite. 2020;144:104479.
pubmed: 31585133
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104479
Gamba R, Wood L, Ampil A, Engelman A, Lam J, Schmeltz M, et al. Investigating the Feasibility of a Restaurant Delivery Service to Improve Food Security among College Students Experiencing Marginal Food Security, a Head-to-Head Trial with Grocery Store Gift Cards. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(18):9680.
pubmed: 34574607
pmcid: 8465385
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189680
Hernandez DC, Daundasekara SS, Walton QL, Eigege CY, Marshall AN. Feasibility of Delivering an on-Campus Food Distribution Program in a Community College Setting: A Mixed Methods Sequential Explanatory Investigation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):12106.
pubmed: 34831861
pmcid: 8619067
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212106
Nazmi A, Condron K, Tseng M, Volpe R, Rodriguez L, Lopez M, et al. SNAP Participation Decreases Food Insecurity among California Public University Students: a quasi-experimental Study. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2022;18(1):123–38.
doi: 10.1080/19320248.2022.2099777
Mello Rodrigues V, Bray J, Fernandes AC, Luci Bernardo G, Hartwell H, SecchiMartinelli S, et al. Vegetable Consumption and Factors Associated with Increased Intake among College Students: A Scoping Review of the Last 10 Years. Nutrients. 2019;11(7):1634.
pubmed: 31319573
pmcid: 6682864
doi: 10.3390/nu11071634
Li X, Braakhuis A, Li Z, Roy R. How does the university food environment impact student dietary behaviors? A systematic review. Front Nutr. 2022;9:840818.
pubmed: 35571951
pmcid: 9090611
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.840818
Rutter H, Savona N, Glonti K, Bibby J, Cummins S, Finegood DT, et al. The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. Lancet. 2017;390(10112):2602–4.
pubmed: 28622953
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31267-9
Sallis JF. Needs and Challenges Related to Multilevel Interventions: Physical Activity Examples. Health Educ Behav. 2018;45(5):661–7.
pubmed: 30122086
doi: 10.1177/1090198118796458
Agurs-Collins T, Persky S, Paskett ED, Barkin SL, Meissner HI, Nansel TR, et al. Designing and Assessing Multilevel Interventions to Improve Minority Health and Reduce Health Disparities. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(S1):S86–93.
pubmed: 30699029
pmcid: 6356127
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304730
Vargas C, Brimblecombe J, Allender S, Whelan J. Co-creation of health-enabling initiatives in food retail: academic perspectives. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):953.
pubmed: 37231441
pmcid: 10214559
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15771-z
Marquis GS, Martin SL, Lartey A. The Multiple Dimensions of Participation: Key Determinants of Nutrition Intervention Outcomes. Curr Dev Nutr. 2023;7(5):100001.
pubmed: 37273841
doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2022.100001
Smajgl A, Ward J. Evaluating participatory research: Framework, methods and implementation results. J Environ Manage. 2015;1(157):311–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.014
International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). Position Paper 3: Impact in Participatory Health Research. Version: March 2020. Berlin: International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research; 2020.
Abma TA, Cook T, Rämgård M, Kleba E, Harris J, Wallerstein N. Social impact of participatory health research: collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization. Educ Action Res. 2017;25(4):489–505.
pubmed: 30135617
pmcid: 6101044
doi: 10.1080/09650792.2017.1329092
Butterfoss FD. Process evaluation for community participation. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:323–40.
pubmed: 16533120
doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102207
Hoffmann TC, Erueti C, Glasziou PP. Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f3755.
pubmed: 24021722
pmcid: 3768250
doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3755