Cricopharyngomyotomy: Outcomes of flexible endoscopic management of small and medium sized Zenker's diverticulum.

Cricopharyngeal myotomy Cricopharyngomyotomy Flexible endoscopy Zenker's diverticulum

Journal

American journal of surgery
ISSN: 1879-1883
Titre abrégé: Am J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370473

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 12 04 2024
revised: 19 06 2024
accepted: 01 07 2024
medline: 10 7 2024
pubmed: 10 7 2024
entrez: 9 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) was historically treated with an open transcervical myotomy with diverticulectomy, but endoscopic approaches have gained popularity, though with little recent data. This study aimed to report flexible endoscopic cricopharyngomyotomy (FEC) outcomes, particularly in smaller diverticula. Patients with ZD treated with FEC at a tertiary center were reviewed. Patients were grouped by diverticulum size: small (sZD)≤1.5 ​cm; medium (mZD) ​> ​1.5 ​cm. Of 30 patients, median age, BMI, sex, and comorbidities were similar between sZD (n ​= ​18) and mZD (n ​= ​12). Overall, 80.0 ​% had the procedure performed with a needle knife. Median number of clips for mucosotomy closure (5.0[5.0,6.0]vs.7.0[5.0,7.0]clips;p ​= ​0.051), operative time (59.5[51.0,75.0]vs.74.5[51.0,93.5]minutes;p ​= ​0.498), length-of-stay (1.0[1.0,1.0]vs.1.0[1.0,1.0]days;p ​= ​0.397), and follow-up (20.8[1.1,33.4]vs.15.6[5.4,50.4]months;p ​= ​0.641) were comparable. There were no postoperative leaks; incomplete myotomy occurred in one sZD, yielding a clinical success rate of 96.7 ​%. FEC has a high success rate for ZD and an advantage in small diverticula, difficult to treat with stapling or open technique.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) was historically treated with an open transcervical myotomy with diverticulectomy, but endoscopic approaches have gained popularity, though with little recent data. This study aimed to report flexible endoscopic cricopharyngomyotomy (FEC) outcomes, particularly in smaller diverticula.
METHODS METHODS
Patients with ZD treated with FEC at a tertiary center were reviewed. Patients were grouped by diverticulum size: small (sZD)≤1.5 ​cm; medium (mZD) ​> ​1.5 ​cm.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 30 patients, median age, BMI, sex, and comorbidities were similar between sZD (n ​= ​18) and mZD (n ​= ​12). Overall, 80.0 ​% had the procedure performed with a needle knife. Median number of clips for mucosotomy closure (5.0[5.0,6.0]vs.7.0[5.0,7.0]clips;p ​= ​0.051), operative time (59.5[51.0,75.0]vs.74.5[51.0,93.5]minutes;p ​= ​0.498), length-of-stay (1.0[1.0,1.0]vs.1.0[1.0,1.0]days;p ​= ​0.397), and follow-up (20.8[1.1,33.4]vs.15.6[5.4,50.4]months;p ​= ​0.641) were comparable. There were no postoperative leaks; incomplete myotomy occurred in one sZD, yielding a clinical success rate of 96.7 ​%.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
FEC has a high success rate for ZD and an advantage in small diverticula, difficult to treat with stapling or open technique.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38981838
pii: S0002-9610(24)00375-1
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115823
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

115823

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest P. Colavita, MD is a research grant recipient from Medtronic; however, this grant is unrelated to the study and has not affected the objectivity of the data. A. Holland, MD, W. Lorenz, MD, A. Ricker, MD, B. Mead, MD, and G. Scarola, MS have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. There is nothing related to intellectual property that needs to be disclosed. Authors do not participate in any activities or organizations that may compete with or impact this study. This study was not funded by any outside entity other than ourselves, including specific funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Finally, we have not utilized artificial intelligence writing assistance in the creation of this manuscript.

Auteurs

Alexis M Holland (AM)

Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. Electronic address: alexis.holland@atriumhealth.org.

William R Lorenz (WR)

Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. Electronic address: william.r.lorenz@atriumhealth.org.

Ansley B Ricker (AB)

Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. Electronic address: ansley.ricker@atriumhealth.org.

Brittany S Mead (BS)

Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. Electronic address: brittany.mead@atriumhealth.org.

Gregory T Scarola (GT)

Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. Electronic address: gregory.scarola@atriumhealth.org.

Paul D Colavita (PD)

Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. Electronic address: Paul.d.colavita@atriumhealth.org.

Classifications MeSH