Evaluations of medical device usability during clinical investigations: a scoping review of clinical study protocols.

Usability clinical investigation clinical investigation protocol human factors medical device methodology

Journal

Expert review of medical devices
ISSN: 1745-2422
Titre abrégé: Expert Rev Med Devices
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101230445

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline: 10 7 2024
pubmed: 10 7 2024
entrez: 10 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Combining clinical investigations with usability studies provides valuable information for medical devices evaluation. But both types of study are very different in terms of objectives and methodologies. How are usability studies integrated into clinical investigations in practice? We searched the ClinicalTrials.gov database for clinical investigation protocols that included usability outcome(s) and analyzed them. 77 study protocols were identified for the analysis, including 102 outcomes related to usability in total. The most frequently assessed outcomes were satisfaction (53/102) and ease of use (33/102). The questionnaire was the most frequently planned technique (85/102) followed by interviews (24/102). Other methods were used, such as observation (9/102), mostly when the end users was a healthcare professional, and diary (6/102), mostly with patients. Our study results showed that the collection of usability data can be included in a clinical investigation, with various levels of investment. Resource-light, rapid integration via a questionnaire will enable the collection of subjective data on the users' perceptions. When more resources are available, observation in accessible environments can be set up (especially during use by healthcare professionals in hospital) or interviews and/or diaries for home-based environments (especially by patients).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38982753
doi: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2378093
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-8

Auteurs

Laura Douze (L)

Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, University Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS, Lille, France.
Inserm, CIC-IT 1403, Lille, France.

Jessica Schiro (J)

Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, University Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS, Lille, France.
Inserm, CIC-IT 1403, Lille, France.

Louise Heyndels (L)

Inserm, CIC-IT 1403, Lille, France.

Lionel Pazart (L)

INSERM CIC 1431, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besancon, France.

Sylvia Pelayo (S)

Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, University Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS, Lille, France.
Inserm, CIC-IT 1403, Lille, France.

Classifications MeSH