Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST) pathway navigation study: a protocol for a nested randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a pathway navigation intervention on lung cancer screening uptake.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline: 11 7 2024
pubmed: 11 7 2024
entrez: 10 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death globally. In 2022 the UK National Screening Committee recommended the implementation of a national targeted lung cancer screening programme, aiming to improve early diagnosis and survival rates. Research studies and services internationally consistently observe socioeconomic and smoking-related inequalities in screening uptake. Pathway navigation (PN) is a process through which a trained pathway navigator guides people to overcome barriers to accessing healthcare services, including screening. This nested randomised controlled trial aims to determine whether a PN intervention results in more individuals participating in lung cancer screening compared with the usual written invitation within a previous non-responder population as part of the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST). A two-arm randomised controlled trial and process evaluation nested within the YLST. Participants aged 55-80 (inclusive) who have not responded to previous postal invitations to screening will be randomised by household to receive PN or usual care (a further postal invitation to contact the screening service for a lung health check) between March 2023 and October 2024. The PN intervention includes a postal appointment notification and prearranged telephone appointment, during which a pathway navigator telephones the participant, following a four-step protocol to introduce the offer and conduct an initial risk assessment. If eligible, participants are invited to book a low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening scan. All pathway navigators receive training from behavioural psychologists on motivational interviewing and communication techniques to elicit barriers to screening attendance and offer solutions. The number undergoing initial telephone assessment of lung cancer risk. The number undergoing an LDCT screening scan.Secondary outcomes include demographic, clinical and risk parameters of people undergoing telephone risk assessment; the number of people eligible for screening following telephone risk assessment; the number of screen-detected cancers diagnosed; costs and a mixed-methods process evaluation.Descriptive analyses will be used to present numbers, proportions and quantitative components of the process evaluation. Primary comparisons of differences between groups will be made using logistic regression. Applied thematic analysis will be used to interpret qualitative data within a conceptual framework based on the COM-B framework. A health economic analysis of the PN intervention will also be conducted. The study is approved by the Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee (18-NW-0012) and the Health Research Authority following the Confidentiality Advisory Group review. Results will be shared through peer-reviewed scientific journals, conference presentations and on the YLST website. ISRCTN42704678 and NCT03750110.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38986555
pii: bmjopen-2024-084577
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084577
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03750110']

Types de publication

Journal Article Clinical Trial Protocol Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e084577

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: PAJC has received consultation fees and shares options from Everest Detection. PAJC is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.

Auteurs

Daisy McInnerney (D)

Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK d.mcinnerney@qmul.ac.uk.

Irene Simmonds (I)

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Neil Hancock (N)

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Suzanne Rogerson (S)

Department of Research and Innovation, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Jason Lindop (J)

Department of Research and Innovation, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Rhian Gabe (R)

Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK.

Daniel Vulkan (D)

Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK.

Catriona Marshall (C)

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Philip A J Crosbie (PAJ)

Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Wythenshawe, UK.

Matthew E J Callister (MEJ)

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Samantha L Quaife (SL)

Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH