Oculomotor atypicalities in motor neurone disease: a systematic review.

antisaccade memory guided saccade motor neurone disease prosaccade saccades smooth pursuit

Journal

Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 12 03 2024
accepted: 13 06 2024
medline: 11 7 2024
pubmed: 11 7 2024
entrez: 11 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cognitive dysfunction is commonplace in Motor Neurone Disease (MND). However, due to the prominent motor symptoms in MND, assessing patients' cognitive function through traditional cognitive assessments, which oftentimes require motoric responses, may become increasingly challenging as the disease progresses. Oculomotor pathways are apparently resistant to pathological degeneration in MND. As such, abnormalities in oculomotor functions, largely driven by cognitive processes such as saccades and smooth pursuit eye movement, may be reflective of frontotemporal cognitive deficits in MND. Thus, saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements may prove to be ideal mechanistic markers of cognitive function in MND. To ascertain the utility of saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements as markers of cognitive function in MND, this review summarizes the literature concerning saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movement task performance in people with MND. Of the 22 studies identified, noticeable patterns suggest that people with MND can be differentiated from controls based on antisaccade and smooth pursuit task performance, and thus the antisaccade task and smooth pursuit task may be potential candidates for markers of cognition in MND. However, further studies which ascertain the concordance between eye tracking measures and traditional measures of cognition are required before this assumption is extrapolated, and clinical recommendations are made. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=376620, identifier CRD42023376620.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38988765
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1399923
pmc: PMC11233471
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

1399923

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Readman, Polden, Gibbs, Donohue, Chhetri and Crawford.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Megan Rose Readman (MR)

Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Megan Polden (M)

Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

Melissa C Gibbs (MC)

Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Aisling Donohue (A)

School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Suresh K Chhetri (SK)

Lancashire and South Cumbria Motor Neurone Disease Care and Research Centre, Neurology Department, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom.

Trevor J Crawford (TJ)

Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH