Grass pollen allergoids conjugated with mannan for subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy: a dose-finding study.
Humans
Male
Female
Adult
Pollen
/ immunology
Allergoids
Mannans
/ administration & dosage
Allergens
/ immunology
Sublingual Immunotherapy
/ methods
Injections, Subcutaneous
Poaceae
/ immunology
Middle Aged
Desensitization, Immunologic
/ methods
Double-Blind Method
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
/ therapy
Administration, Sublingual
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Immunoglobulin E
/ immunology
allergoid
clinical trial
grass pollen
immunotherapy
mannan
polymerized
Journal
Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
11
05
2024
accepted:
03
06
2024
medline:
11
7
2024
pubmed:
11
7
2024
entrez:
11
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Polymerized allergoids conjugated with mannan represent a novel approach of allergen immunotherapy targeting dendritic cells. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal dose of mannan-allergoid conjugates derived from grass pollen ( A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a double-dummy design was conducted, involving 162 participants across 12 centers in Spain. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of nine different treatment groups, each receiving either placebo or active treatment at doses of 500, 1,000, 3,000, or 5,000 mTU/mL over four months. Each participant received five subcutaneous (SC) doses of 0.5 mL each, every 30 days, and a daily sublingual (SL) dose of 0.2 mL. Participants who received active treatment through SC, received placebo through SL. Participants who received active treatment through SL, received placebo SC. One Group, as control, received bot SC and SL placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the improvement in titrated nasal provocation tests (NPT) at the end of the study compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included specific antibody (IgG4, IgE) and cellular (IL-10 producing and regulatory T cell) responses. All adverse events and side reactions were recorded and assessed. Post-treatment, the active groups showed improvements in NPT ranging from 33% to 53%, with the highest doses showing the greatest improvements regardless of the administration route. In comparison, the placebo group showed a 12% improvement. Significant differences over placebo were observed at doses of 3,000 mTU/mL (p=0.049 for SL, p=0.015 for SC) and 5,000 mTU/mL (p=0.011 for SL, p=0.015 for SC). A dose-dependent increase in IgG4 was observed following SC administration, and an increase in IL-10 producing cells for both routes of administration. No serious systemic or local adverse reactions were recorded, and no adrenaline was required. Grass pollen immunotherapy with mannan-allergoid conjugates was found to be safe and efficacious in achieving the primary outcome, whether administered via the subcutaneous or sublingual routes, at doses of 3,000 and 5,000 mTU/mL. https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search (EudraCT), identifier 2014-005471-88; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02654223.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Polymerized allergoids conjugated with mannan represent a novel approach of allergen immunotherapy targeting dendritic cells. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal dose of mannan-allergoid conjugates derived from grass pollen (
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a double-dummy design was conducted, involving 162 participants across 12 centers in Spain. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of nine different treatment groups, each receiving either placebo or active treatment at doses of 500, 1,000, 3,000, or 5,000 mTU/mL over four months. Each participant received five subcutaneous (SC) doses of 0.5 mL each, every 30 days, and a daily sublingual (SL) dose of 0.2 mL. Participants who received active treatment through SC, received placebo through SL. Participants who received active treatment through SL, received placebo SC. One Group, as control, received bot SC and SL placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the improvement in titrated nasal provocation tests (NPT) at the end of the study compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included specific antibody (IgG4, IgE) and cellular (IL-10 producing and regulatory T cell) responses. All adverse events and side reactions were recorded and assessed.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Post-treatment, the active groups showed improvements in NPT ranging from 33% to 53%, with the highest doses showing the greatest improvements regardless of the administration route. In comparison, the placebo group showed a 12% improvement. Significant differences over placebo were observed at doses of 3,000 mTU/mL (p=0.049 for SL, p=0.015 for SC) and 5,000 mTU/mL (p=0.011 for SL, p=0.015 for SC). A dose-dependent increase in IgG4 was observed following SC administration, and an increase in IL-10 producing cells for both routes of administration. No serious systemic or local adverse reactions were recorded, and no adrenaline was required.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Grass pollen immunotherapy with mannan-allergoid conjugates was found to be safe and efficacious in achieving the primary outcome, whether administered via the subcutaneous or sublingual routes, at doses of 3,000 and 5,000 mTU/mL.
Clinical trial registration
UNASSIGNED
https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search (EudraCT), identifier 2014-005471-88; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02654223.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38989287
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1431351
pmc: PMC11233432
doi:
Substances chimiques
Allergoids
0
Mannans
0
Allergens
0
Immunoglobulin E
37341-29-0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02654223']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1431351Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Ojeda, Barjau, Subiza, Moreno, Ojeda, Solano, Alonso, Caballero, Del Pozo, Gómez-Perosanz, Sánchez-Trincado, Benito-Villalvilla, Angelina, Soria, Reche, Palomares, Subiza and Casanovas.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
JLS and MC are shareholders of Inmunotek. RC, SP, MG-P and IS are employees of Inmunotek. OP received research grants from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Inmunotek, and Novartis and fees for giving scientific lectures or participation in Advisory Boards from: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Inmunotek, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.