Circulating Tumor DNA Assessment for Treatment Monitoring Adds Value to PSA in Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.


Journal

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Jul 2024
Historique:
accepted: 09 07 2024
received: 05 04 2024
revised: 01 06 2024
medline: 11 7 2024
pubmed: 11 7 2024
entrez: 11 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Enzalutamide after abiraterone progression is commonly used in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) despite a low rate of clinical benefit. Analyzing IMbassador250, a phase III trial assessing enzalutamide with or without atezolizumab after abiraterone, we hypothesized that baseline and early changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) tumor fraction (TF) may identify patients more likely to exhibit survival benefit from enzalutamide. ctDNA was quantified from plasma samples using a tissue-agnostic assay without buffy coat sequencing. Baseline ctDNA TF, changes in ctDNA TF from baseline to cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1), and detection at C3D1 alone, were compared vs overall response rate (ORR), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), median OS (mOS), and 50% reduction in PSA. ctDNA TF detection at baseline and/or C3D1 was associated with shorter rPFS and OS in 494 evaluable patients. Detection of ctDNA TF at C3D1, with or without detection at C1D1, was associated with worse rPFS and mOS than lack of detection. When ctDNA TF and PSA response at C3D1 were discordant, patients with [ctDNA TF undetected/PSA not reduced] had more favorable outcomes than [ctDNA TF detected/PSA reduced] (mOS 22.1 months vs. 16 months, p<0.001). In a large cohort of mCRPC patients receiving enzalutamide after abiraterone, we demonstrate the utility of a new tissue-agnostic assay for monitoring molecular response based on ctDNA TF detection and dynamics. CtDNA TF provides a minimally-invasive, complementary biomarker to PSA testing and may refine personalized treatment approaches.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38990098
pii: 746387
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1096
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Christopher J Sweeney (CJ)

University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Russell Petry (R)

Foundation Medicine, Boston, United States.

Chang Xu (C)

Foundation Medicine, United States.

Merrida Childress (M)

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.

Jie He (J)

Foundaion Medicine, Cambridge, MA, United States.

David Fabrizio (D)

Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States.

Ole Gjoerup (O)

Foundation Medicine, Boston, United States.

Samantha Morley (S)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States.

Timothy Catlett (T)

Foundation Medicine, Boston, United States.

Zoe June Assaf (ZJ)

Roche/Genentech, United States.

Kobe Yuen (K)

Genentech, south san francisco, CA, United States.

Matthew Wongchenko (M)

Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, United States.

Kalpit Shah (K)

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, United States.

Pratyush Gupta (P)

Genentech Foundation, South San Francisco, California, United States.

Priti Hegde (P)

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States.

Lincoln W Pasquina (LW)

Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

Ryon P Graf (RP)

Foundation Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States.

Thomas Powles (T)

Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH