Momelotinib versus Continued Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy in JAK Inhibitor-Experienced Patients with Myelofibrosis and Anemia: Subgroup Analysis of SIMPLIFY-2.

Anemia Anemia supportive therapy Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents Hemoglobin Momelotinib Myelofibrosis Red blood cell transfusions Ruxolitinib Transfusion independence

Journal

Advances in therapy
ISSN: 1865-8652
Titre abrégé: Adv Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8611864

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 14 05 2024
accepted: 12 06 2024
medline: 11 7 2024
pubmed: 11 7 2024
entrez: 11 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Some Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib do not address and may worsen anemia in patients with myelofibrosis. In these cases, the JAK inhibitor may be continued at a reduced dose in an effort to maintain splenic and symptom control, with supportive therapy and/or red blood cell (RBC) transfusions added to manage anemia. This post hoc descriptive analysis of the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-2 trial evaluated the relative benefits of this approach versus switching to the JAK1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib in patients for whom anemia management is a key consideration. SIMPLIFY-2 was a randomized (2:1), open-label, phase 3 trial of momelotinib versus best available therapy (BAT; 88.5% continued ruxolitinib) in JAK inhibitor-experienced patients with myelofibrosis (n = 156). Patient subgroups (n = 105 each) were defined by either baseline (1) hemoglobin (Hb) of < 100 g/L or (2) non-transfusion independence (not meeting the criteria of no transfusions and no Hb of < 80 g/L for the previous 12 weeks); outcomes have been summarized descriptively. In both subgroups of interest, week 24 transfusion independence rates were higher with momelotinib versus BAT/ruxolitinib: baseline Hb of < 100 g/L, 22 (33.3%) versus 5 (12.8%); baseline non-transfusion independent, 25 (34.7%) versus 1 (3.0%). Mean Hb levels over time were also generally higher in both subgroups with momelotinib, despite median transfusion rates through week 24 with momelotinib being comparable to or lower than with BAT/ruxolitinib. Spleen and symptom response rates with momelotinib in these subgroups were comparable to the intent-to-treat population, while rates with BAT/ruxolitinib were lower. In patients with moderate-to-severe anemia and/or in need of RBC transfusions, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using anemia supportive therapies. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02101268. Patients with the rare blood cancer myelofibrosis often experience symptoms such as tiredness, an increase in the size of their spleens (an organ involved in filtering the blood), and anemia (too few red blood cells). One type of treatment for myelofibrosis, called a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, can help patients to feel better and reduce the size of their spleens, but some JAK inhibitors do not help with anemia and may make it worse. In those situations, patients may continue to take their JAK inhibitor but also receive another type of treatment, called an anemia supportive therapy, and may also receive red blood cell transfusions. This study compared 2 treatment approaches, continuing the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib and adding an anemia supportive therapy and/or transfusions versus switching to another treatment called momelotinib, in 2 groups of patients from a clinical trial: (1) patients with levels of hemoglobin (a red blood cell protein) at the start of the trial that indicated that they had anemia, and (2) patients who were already receiving red blood cell transfusions at the start of the trial. In both groups, more patients did not need red blood cell transfusions anymore at week 24 with momelotinib, and their hemoglobin levels on average became higher over time. More patients also had improvements in spleen size and symptoms with momelotinib. Overall, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using supportive therapies and/or red blood cell transfusions to treat anemia.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Patients with the rare blood cancer myelofibrosis often experience symptoms such as tiredness, an increase in the size of their spleens (an organ involved in filtering the blood), and anemia (too few red blood cells). One type of treatment for myelofibrosis, called a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, can help patients to feel better and reduce the size of their spleens, but some JAK inhibitors do not help with anemia and may make it worse. In those situations, patients may continue to take their JAK inhibitor but also receive another type of treatment, called an anemia supportive therapy, and may also receive red blood cell transfusions. This study compared 2 treatment approaches, continuing the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib and adding an anemia supportive therapy and/or transfusions versus switching to another treatment called momelotinib, in 2 groups of patients from a clinical trial: (1) patients with levels of hemoglobin (a red blood cell protein) at the start of the trial that indicated that they had anemia, and (2) patients who were already receiving red blood cell transfusions at the start of the trial. In both groups, more patients did not need red blood cell transfusions anymore at week 24 with momelotinib, and their hemoglobin levels on average became higher over time. More patients also had improvements in spleen size and symptoms with momelotinib. Overall, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using supportive therapies and/or red blood cell transfusions to treat anemia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38990433
doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02928-4
pii: 10.1007/s12325-024-02928-4
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02101268']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. Crown.

Références

Naymagon L, Mascarenhas J. Myelofibrosis-related anemia: current and emerging therapeutic strategies. Hemasphere. 2017;1(1): e1.
doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000001 pubmed: 31723730 pmcid: 6745971
Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Jimma T, Finke CM, Gangat N, Vaidya R, et al. One thousand patients with primary myelofibrosis: the Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(1):25–33.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.11.001 pubmed: 22212965 pmcid: 3538387
Chifotides HT, Bose P, Verstovsek S. Momelotinib: an emerging treatment for myelofibrosis patients with anemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):7.
doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01157-4 pubmed: 35045875 pmcid: 8772195
Jakafi (ruxolitinib). Prescribing information. Incyte; 2023. https://www.jakafi.com/pdf/prescribing-information.pdf . Accessed Apr 22, 2024.
Inrebic (fedratinib). Prescribing information. Bristol Myers Squibb; 2023. https://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_inrebic.pdf . Accessed Apr 22, 2024.
Vonjo (pacritinib). Prescribing information. CTI BioPharma Corp.; 2023. https://www.ctibiopharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/VONJO_USPI.pdf . Accessed Apr 22, 2024.
Ojjaara (momelotinib). Prescribing information. GSK; 2023. https://gskpro.com/content/dam/global/hcpportal/en_US/Prescribing_Information/Ojjaara/pdf/OJJAARA-PI-PIL.PDF . Accessed Apr 22, 2024.
Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, Catalano JV, Devos T, Egyed M, Hellmann A, et al. SIMPLIFY-1: a phase III randomized trial of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in Janus kinase inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(34):3844–50.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.4418 pubmed: 28930494 pmcid: 6553796
Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Platzbecker U, Cervantes F, Gupta V, Lavie D, et al. Momelotinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY 2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5(2):e73–81.
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30237-5 pubmed: 29275119
Verstovsek S, Gerds AT, Vannucchi AM, Al-Ali HK, Lavie D, Kuykendall AT, et al. Momelotinib versus danazol in symptomatic patients with anemia and myelofibrosis (MOMENTUM): results from an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2023;401(10373):269–80.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02036-0 pubmed: 36709073
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines
Mesa R, Verstovsek S, Platzbecker U, Gupta V, Lavie D, Giraldo P, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with myelofibrosis after immediate transition to momelotinib from ruxolitinib. Haematologica. 2024;109(2):676–81.
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283106 pubmed: 37259556
Addo OY, Yu EX, Williams AM, Young MF, Sharma AJ, Mei Z, et al. Evaluation of hemoglobin cutoff levels to define anemia among healthy individuals. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(8):e2119123.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19123 pubmed: 34357395 pmcid: 8346941
Cappellini MD, Motta I. Anemia in clinical practice-definition and classification: does hemoglobin change with aging? Semin Hematol. 2015;52(4):261–9.
doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2015.07.006 pubmed: 26404438
Gale RP, Barosi G, Barbui T, Cervantes F, Dohner K, Dupriez B, et al. What are RBC-transfusion-dependence and -independence? Leuk Res. 2011;35(1):8–11.
doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2010.07.015 pubmed: 20692036
Vannucchi AM, Barbui T, Cervantes F, Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Kroger N, et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(Suppl 5):v85-99.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv203 pubmed: 26242182
World Health Organization. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/85839/WHO_NMH_NHD_MNM_11.1_eng.pdf . Accessed Apr 22, 2024.
Bose P, Verstovsek S. Management of myelofibrosis-related cytopenias. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018;13(3):164–72.
doi: 10.1007/s11899-018-0447-9 pubmed: 29796726
Palandri F, Breccia M, Mazzoni C, Auteri G, Elli EM, Trawinska MM, et al. Ruxolitinib in cytopenic myelofibrosis: response, toxicity, drug discontinuation, and outcome. Cancer. 2023;129(11):1704–13.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.34722 pubmed: 36932983
Oh ST, Talpaz M, Gerds AT, Gupta V, Verstovsek S, Mesa R, et al. ACVR1/JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor momelotinib reverses transfusion dependency and suppresses hepcidin in myelofibrosis phase 2 trial. Blood Adv. 2020;4(18):4282–91.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002662 pubmed: 32915978 pmcid: 7509854
Oh ST, Mesa RA, Harrison CN, Bose P, Gerds AT, Gupta V, et al. Pacritinib is a potent ACVR1 inhibitor with significant anemia benefit in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood Adv. 2023;7(19):5835–42.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010151 pubmed: 37552106 pmcid: 10561048

Auteurs

Claire N Harrison (CN)

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK. claire.harrison@gstt.nhs.uk.

Alessandro M Vannucchi (AM)

University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Christian Recher (C)

University Hospital Center (CHU) of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Francesco Passamonti (F)

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Onco-Ematologia, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Aaron T Gerds (AT)

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Juan Carlos Hernandez-Boluda (JC)

Hospital Clìnico de Valencia-INCLIVA, University of Medicine, Valencia, Spain.

Abdulraheem Yacoub (A)

University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Shireen Sirhan (S)

Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Catherine Ellis (C)

GSK plc, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Bharat Patel (B)

GSK plc, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Bryan Strouse (B)

GSK plc, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Uwe Platzbecker (U)

University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Classifications MeSH