Modified ventriculoperitoneal shunt applied to temporary external ventricular drainage.
External ventricular drainage
Hydrocephalus
Modified ventriculoperitoneal shunt
Ommaya reservoir
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Jul 2024
11 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
21
03
2024
accepted:
05
07
2024
medline:
12
7
2024
pubmed:
12
7
2024
entrez:
11
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a common procedure in neurosurgical practice. Presently, the three methods used most often include direct EVD (dEVD), long-tunneled external ventricular drains (LTEVDs), and EVD via the Ommaya reservoir (EVDvOR). But they possess drawbacks such as limited duration of retention, vulnerability to iatrogenic secondary infections, and challenges in regulating drainage flow. This study aimed to explore the use of a modified ventriculoperitoneal shunt (mVPS)-the abdominal end of the VPS device was placed externally-as a means of temporary EVD to address the aforementioned limitations. This retrospective cohort study, included 120 cases requiring EVD. dEVD was performed for 31 cases, EVDvOR for 54 cases (including 8 cases with previously performed dEVD), and mVPS for 35 cases (including 6 cases with previously performed EVDvOR). The one-time success rate (no need for further other EVD intervention) for dEVD, EVDvOR, and mVPS were 70.97%, 88.89%, and 91.42%, dEVD vs EVDvOR (P < 0.05), dEVD vs mVPS (P < 0.05), EVDvOR vs mVPS (P > 0.05). Puncture needle displacement or detachment was observed in nearly all cases of EVDvOR, while no such complications have been observed with mVPS. Apart from this complication, the incidence of postoperative complications was 35.48%, 14.81%, and 8.5%, dEVD vs EVDvOR (P < 0.05), dEVD vs mVPS (P < 0.05), EVDvOR vs mVPS (P > 0.05). Mean postoperative retention for EVD was 14.68 ± 9.50 days, 25.96 ± 15.14 days, and 82.43 ± 64.45 days, respectively (P < 0.001). In conclusion, mVPS significantly extends the duration of EVD, which is particularly beneficial for patients requiring long-term EVD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38992174
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66917-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-66917-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16009Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Szuflita, N. et al. Native ureter ventriculo-ureteral shunt placement for management of refractory hydrocephalus in a child with a history of renal transplant: Case report and technical note. Urology 148, 260–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.033 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.033
pubmed: 32745486
Girotti, M. E., Singh, R. R. & Rodgers, B. M. The ventriculo-gallbladder shunt in the treatment of refractory hydrocephalus: A review of the current literature. Am. Surg. 75, 734–737 (2009).
doi: 10.1177/000313480907500819
pubmed: 19725301
Zhang, Z. et al. The insertion and management of an external ventricular drain in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus associated with medulloblastoma. Neurosurg. Rev. 46, 170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02080-7 (2023).
doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02080-7
pubmed: 37433938
Copley, P. C. et al. Guideline for the management of long tunnelled external ventricular drains in chronic hydrocephalus. Br. J. Nurs. 30, 416–421. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.7.416 (2021).
doi: 10.12968/bjon.2021.30.7.416
pubmed: 33830799
Jiang, C., Wu, X., Lin, Z., Wang, C. & Kang, D. External drainage with an Ommaya reservoir for perioperative hydrocephalus in children with posterior fossa tumors. Childs Nerv. Syst. 29, 1293–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2078-8 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2078-8
pubmed: 23503633
Palpan Flores, A., Saceda Gutiérrez, J., Brin Reyes, J. R., Sierra Tamayo, J. & Carceller Benito, F. Risk factors associated with conversion of an Ommaya reservoir to a permanent cerebrospinal fluid shunt in preterm posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.11.Peds19320 (2020).
doi: 10.3171/2019.11.Peds19320
pubmed: 31952037
Chen, Q. et al. Post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus: Recent advances and new therapeutic insights. J. Neurol. Sci. 375, 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2017.01.072 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.01.072
pubmed: 28320134
Luong, C. Q. et al. Effectiveness of combined external ventricular drainage with intraventricular fibrinolysis for the treatment of intraventricular haemorrhage with acute obstructive hydrocephalus. Cerebrovasc. Dis. Extra 9, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1159/000501530 (2019).
doi: 10.1159/000501530
pubmed: 31408859
pmcid: 6751468
Sun, C. et al. Choice for the removal of bloody cerebrospinal fluid in postcoiling aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: External ventricular drainage or lumbar drainage?. Turk. Neurosurg. 24, 737–744. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.Jtn.9837-13.2 (2014).
doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.Jtn.9837-13.2
pubmed: 25269046
van Lieshout, J. H. et al. Volume of cerebrospinal fluid drainage as a predictor for pretreatment aneurysmal rebleeding. J. Neurosurg. 128, 1778–1784. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.2.Jns162748 (2018).
doi: 10.3171/2017.2.Jns162748
pubmed: 28799877
Kamat, A. S., Gretschel, A., Vlok, A. J. & Solomons, R. CSF protein concentration associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt obstruction in tuberculous meningitis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 22, 788–792. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.17.0008 (2018).
doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0008
pubmed: 29914605
Champey, J. et al. Strategies to reduce external ventricular drain-related infections: A multicenter retrospective study. J. Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.1.Jns172486 (2018).
doi: 10.3171/2018.1.Jns172486
pubmed: 29932377
George, T., Moorthy, R. K. & Rajshekhar, V. Long tunnel external ventricular drain: An adjunct in the management of patients with infection associated hydrocephalus. Br. J. Neurosurg. 33, 659–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2019.1667483 (2019).
doi: 10.1080/02688697.2019.1667483
pubmed: 31549855
Chen, H. et al. A clinical study on the use of intraventricular polymyxin B supplemented by continuous external ventricular drainage in the treatment of drug-resistant gram-negative bacilli intracranial infection. Infect. Drug Resist. 13, 2963–2970. https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.S261510 (2020).
doi: 10.2147/idr.S261510
pubmed: 32904679
pmcid: 7457587
Xia, D., Jiang, X., Li, Z., Jin, Y. & Dai, Y. External ventricular drainage combined with continuous lumbar drainage in the treatment of ventricular hemorrhage. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 15, 677–682. https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.S207750 (2019).
doi: 10.2147/tcrm.S207750
pubmed: 31213820
pmcid: 6549662
Singh, H., Patir, R., Vaishya, S., Miglani, R. & Kaur, A. External ventricular drain related complications-whether continuous csf drainage via ommaya reservoir is the answer?. Neurol. India 68, 458–461. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.284354 (2020).
doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.284354
pubmed: 32415024
Donovan, J. et al. The neurocritical care of tuberculous meningitis. Lancet Neurol. 18, 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30154-1 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30154-1
pubmed: 31109897
Tahir, M. Z., Sobani, Z. A., Murtaza, M. & Enam, S. A. Long-tunneled versus short-tunneled external ventricular drainage: Prospective experience from a developing country. Asian J. Neurosurg. 11, 114–117. https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.145052 (2016).
doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.145052
pubmed: 27057216
pmcid: 4802931
Roach, J., Gaastra, B., Bulters, D. & Shtaya, A. Safety, accuracy, and cost effectiveness of bedside bolt external ventricular drains (EVDs) in comparison with tunneled EVDs inserted in theaters. World Neurosurg. 125, e473–e478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.106 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.106
pubmed: 30735879
Walek, K. W. et al. Risk factors and outcomes associated with external ventricular drain infections. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 43, 1859–1866. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.23 (2022).
doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.23
pubmed: 35471129
pmcid: 9753061
Saenz, A., Mengide, J. P., Argañaraz, R. & Mantese, B. Long-tunneled versus short-tunneled external ventricular drain: A quasi-experimental study in a cohort of pediatric patients. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 31, 306–312. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.12.Peds22510 (2023).
doi: 10.3171/2022.12.Peds22510
pubmed: 36708542
Park, J., Choi, Y. J., Ohk, B. & Chang, H. H. Cerebrospinal fluid leak at percutaneous exit of ventricular catheter as a crucial risk factor for external ventricular drainage-related infection in adult neurosurgical patients. World Neurosurg. 109, e398–e403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.190 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.190
pubmed: 28989043
Dorresteijn, K., Jellema, K., van de Beek, D. & Brouwer, M. C. Factors and measures predicting external CSF drain-associated ventriculitis: A review and meta-analysis. Neurology 93, 964–972. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000008552 (2019).
doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000008552
pubmed: 31659095
Al-Tamimi, Y. Z. et al. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt 30-day failure rate: A retrospective international cohort study. Neurosurgery 74, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000000196 (2014).
doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000000196
pubmed: 24089046
Anderson, I. A. et al. Factors associated with 30-day ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure in pediatric and adult patients. J. Neurosurg. 130, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.Jns17399 (2018).
doi: 10.3171/2017.8.Jns17399
pubmed: 29521592
Isaacs, A. M. et al. Reducing the risks of proximal and distal shunt failure in adult hydrocephalus: A shunt outcomes quality improvement study. J. Neurosurg. 136, 877–886. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.2.Jns202970 (2022).
doi: 10.3171/2021.2.Jns202970
pubmed: 34450584