Oral Health Indicators and Bone Mineral Density Disorders in Older Age: A Systematic Review.

As we age, maintaining good oral health becomes increasingly crucial for performing daily tasks. Age-related physiological decline can disrupt various biological systems, causing a significant challenge for geriatric dentistry. A systematic review of the literature using six different electronic databases was conducted to investigate the relationship between oral health indicators and bone mineral density disorders in older adults. The study is registered as a priori protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42023403340). A minimum age of 60 years was the main inclusion criterion for all original research articles. Two independent researchers assessed the eligibility of 19,362 records against the inclusion criteria and found 12 articles fitting the eligibility requirements. Five different indicators of poor oral health [number of teeth, periodontal disease, general oral health (dental caries prevalence and dental treatment needs), masticatory function, and occlusal force)] were found related to three outcomes linked to bone mineral density disorders (osteoporosis, fractures, and decreased bone mineral density), regardless of the adopted assessment tools. The number of teeth was negatively associated with fractures and a decreased bone mineral density, while periodontal disease was positively associated with osteoporosis and a decreased bone mineral density. Masticatory function was associated only with osteoporosis, while general oral health was associated only with fractures and occlusal force only with bone mineral density. The oral health indicator most frequently associated with outcomes linked to bone mineral density disorders was the number of teeth. The present findings could help to assess the contribution of each oral health indicator to the development of bone mineral density disorders in older age.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.