Comorbidity Scores and Machine Learning Methods Can Improve Risk Assessment in Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

Bladder neoplasms artificial intelligence complication mortality prognosis

Journal

Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
ISSN: 2352-3735
Titre abrégé: Bladder Cancer
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101668567

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 24 11 2021
accepted: 05 04 2022
medline: 3 6 2022
pubmed: 3 6 2022
entrez: 12 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pre-operative risk assessment in radical cystectomy (RC) is an ongoing challenge especially in elderly patients. To evaluate the ability of comorbidity indices and their combination with clinical parameters in machine learning models to predict mortality and morbidity after RC. In 392 patients who underwent open RC, complication and mortality rates were reported. The predictive values of the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity index (aCCI), the Elixhauser Index (EI), the Physical Status Classification System (ASA) and Gagne's combined comorbidity Index (GCI) were evaluated using regression analyses. Various machine learning models (Gaussian naïve bayes, logistic regression, neural net, decision tree, random forest) were additionally investigated. The aCCI, ASA and GCI showed significant results for the prediction of complications (χ The ASA and aCCI show good prediction of mortality after RC but fail predicting complications accurately. Here, the combination of comorbidity indices and clinical parameters in machine learning models seems promising.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pre-operative risk assessment in radical cystectomy (RC) is an ongoing challenge especially in elderly patients.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the ability of comorbidity indices and their combination with clinical parameters in machine learning models to predict mortality and morbidity after RC.
METHODS METHODS
In 392 patients who underwent open RC, complication and mortality rates were reported. The predictive values of the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity index (aCCI), the Elixhauser Index (EI), the Physical Status Classification System (ASA) and Gagne's combined comorbidity Index (GCI) were evaluated using regression analyses. Various machine learning models (Gaussian naïve bayes, logistic regression, neural net, decision tree, random forest) were additionally investigated.
RESULTS RESULTS
The aCCI, ASA and GCI showed significant results for the prediction of complications (χ
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The ASA and aCCI show good prediction of mortality after RC but fail predicting complications accurately. Here, the combination of comorbidity indices and clinical parameters in machine learning models seems promising.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38993365
doi: 10.3233/BLC-211640
pii: BLC211640
pmc: PMC11181714
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

155-163

Informations de copyright

© 2022 – The authors. Published by IOS Press.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Frderik Wessels has no conflict of interest to report. Isabelle Bußhoff has no conflict of interest to report. Sophia Adam has no conflict of interest to report. Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski has no conflict of interest to report. Manuel Neuberger has no conflict of interest to report. Philipp Nuhn has no conflict of interest to report. Maurice Stephan Michel is financially supported by the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe, project ID 73000189). The sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data, preparation, review or approval of the manuscript, and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Maximilian C. Kriegmair is financially supported by the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe, project ID 73000189). The sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data, preparation, review or approval of the manuscript, and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Availability of data and materialData is available only internally due to its sensitive nature and its protection under the European General Data Protection Regulation. Sharing of data with external researchers might only be possible upon reasonable request and after obtaining ethics approval.

Auteurs

Frederik Wessels (F)

Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Isabelle Bußoff (I)

Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Sophia Adam (S)

Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski (KF)

Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Manuel Neuberger (M)

Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Philipp Nuhn (P)

Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Maurice S Michel (MS)

Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Maximilian C Kriegmair (MC)

Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Classifications MeSH