Current practice and novel approaches in organ preservation.
isochoric preservation
liver preservation
machine perfusion
nanowarming
organ transplantation
partial freezing
subzero preservation
supercooling
Journal
Frontiers in transplantation
ISSN: 2813-2440
Titre abrégé: Front Transplant
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918573988006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
01
02
2023
accepted:
16
05
2023
medline:
8
6
2023
pubmed:
8
6
2023
entrez:
12
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Organ transplantation remains the only treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The last decade has seen a flurry of activity in improving organ preservation technologies, which promise to increase utilization in a dramatic fashion. They also bring the promise of extending the preservation duration significantly, which opens the doors to sharing organs across local and international boundaries and transforms the field. In this work, we review the recent literature on machine perfusion of livers across various protocols in development and clinical use, in the context of extending the preservation duration. We then review the next generation of technologies that have the potential to further extend the limits and open the door to banking organs, including supercooling, partial freezing, and nanowarming, and outline the opportunities arising in the field for researchers in the short and long term.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38993842
doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1156845
pmc: PMC11235303
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1156845Informations de copyright
© 2023 Ozgur, Namsrai, Pruett, Bischof, Toner, Finger and Uygun.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Some authors declare competing interests. KU, JB, and MT have patent applications relevant to this study. KU and MT have a financial interest in and serve on the Scientific Advisory Board for Sylvatica Biotech Inc., a company focused on developing high subzero organ preservation technology. Competing interests for MGH investigators are managed by MGH and MGB in accordance with their conflict-of-interest policies. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. KU declares that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.