The role of lung-restricted autoantibodies in the development of primary and chronic graft dysfunction.
chronic graft dysfunction
de novo synthesis
lung-restricted antibodies
pre-existing auto-antibodies
primary graft dysfunction
Journal
Frontiers in transplantation
ISSN: 2813-2440
Titre abrégé: Front Transplant
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918573988006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
09
06
2023
accepted:
18
10
2023
medline:
12
7
2024
pubmed:
12
7
2024
entrez:
12
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lung transplantation is a life-saving treatment for both chronic end-stage lung diseases and acute respiratory distress syndrome, including those caused by infectious agents like COVID-19. Despite its increasing utilization, outcomes post-lung transplantation are worse than other solid organ transplants. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD)-a condition affecting more than half of the recipients post-transplantation-is the chief risk factor for post-operative mortality, transplant-associated multi-organ dysfunction, and long-term graft loss due to chronic rejection. While donor-specific antibodies targeting allogenic human leukocyte antigens have been linked to transplant rejection, the role of recipient's pre-existing immunoglobulin G autoantibodies against lung-restricted self-antigens (LRA), like collagen type V and k-alpha1 tubulin, is less understood in the context of lung transplantation. Recent studies have found an increased risk of PGD development in lung transplant recipients with LRA. This review will synthesize past and ongoing research-utilizing both mouse models and human subjects-aimed at unraveling the mechanisms by which LRA heightens the risk of PGD. Furthermore, it will explore prospective approaches designed to mitigate the impact of LRA on lung transplant patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38993924
doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1237671
pmc: PMC11235341
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1237671Informations de copyright
© 2023 Yang, Lecuona, Wu, Liu, Sun, Alam, Nadig and Bharat.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors SN declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.