Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound Hepatocellular carcinoma Intracellular cholangiocarcinoma Liver cancer Quantitative ultrasound Time-intensity curve

Journal

World journal of gastrointestinal oncology
ISSN: 1948-5204
Titre abrégé: World J Gastrointest Oncol
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101532470

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 20 01 2024
revised: 14 04 2024
accepted: 28 04 2024
medline: 12 7 2024
pubmed: 12 7 2024
entrez: 12 7 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Non-invasive differential diagnosis between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other liver cancer ( To explore clinical evidence regarding the application of DCEUS in the differential diagnosis of liver nodules. A comprehensive literature search of clinical studies was performed to identify the parameters of DCEUS that could relate to histological diagnosis. In accordance with the study protocol, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the evidence was planned. Rise time was significantly higher in HCC patients with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.83 (95%CI: 0.48-1.18). Similarly, other statistically significant parameters were mean transit time local with a SMD of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.20-1.27), peak enhancement with a SMD of 0.37 (95%CI: 0.03-0.70), area wash-in area under the curve with a SMD of 0.47 (95%CI: 0.13-0.81), wash-out area under the curve with a SMD of 0.55 (95%CI: 0.21-0.89) and wash-in and wash-out area under the curve with SMD of 0.51 (95%CI: 0.17-0.85). SMD resulted not significant in fall time and wash-in rate, but the latter presented a trend towards greater values in HCC compared to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. DCEUS could improve non-invasive diagnosis of HCC, leading to less liver biopsy and early treatment. This quantitative analysis needs to be applied on larger cohorts to confirm these preliminary results.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Non-invasive differential diagnosis between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other liver cancer (
AIM OBJECTIVE
To explore clinical evidence regarding the application of DCEUS in the differential diagnosis of liver nodules.
METHODS METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of clinical studies was performed to identify the parameters of DCEUS that could relate to histological diagnosis. In accordance with the study protocol, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the evidence was planned.
RESULTS RESULTS
Rise time was significantly higher in HCC patients with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.83 (95%CI: 0.48-1.18). Similarly, other statistically significant parameters were mean transit time local with a SMD of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.20-1.27), peak enhancement with a SMD of 0.37 (95%CI: 0.03-0.70), area wash-in area under the curve with a SMD of 0.47 (95%CI: 0.13-0.81), wash-out area under the curve with a SMD of 0.55 (95%CI: 0.21-0.89) and wash-in and wash-out area under the curve with SMD of 0.51 (95%CI: 0.17-0.85). SMD resulted not significant in fall time and wash-in rate, but the latter presented a trend towards greater values in HCC compared to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
DCEUS could improve non-invasive diagnosis of HCC, leading to less liver biopsy and early treatment. This quantitative analysis needs to be applied on larger cohorts to confirm these preliminary results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38994130
doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2804
pmc: PMC11236224
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2804-2815

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflicts-of-interest related to this article.

Auteurs

Giorgio Esposto (G)

Department of CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome 00168, Italy.

Paolo Santini (P)

Department of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy.

Fabrizio Termite (F)

Department of CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome 00168, Italy.

Linda Galasso (L)

Department of CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome 00168, Italy.

Irene Mignini (I)

Department of CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome 00168, Italy.

Maria Elena Ainora (ME)

Department of CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome 00168, Italy.

Antonio Gasbarrini (A)

Department of Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy.

Maria Assunta Zocco (MA)

Department of CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome 00168, Italy. mariaassunta.zocco@unicatt.it.

Classifications MeSH