Relative Contribution of Diagnostic Testing to the Diagnosis of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Hospitalized Adults in the United States.

BACKGROUND

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute respiratory illness (ARI) in older adults. Optimizing diagnosis could improve understanding of RSV burden.

METHODS

We enrolled adults ≥50 years of age hospitalized with ARI and adults of any age hospitalized with congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations at two hospitals during two respiratory seasons (2018-2020). We collected nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swabs (n=1558), acute and convalescent sera (n=568), and expectorated sputum (n=153) from participants, and recorded standard-of-care (SOC) NP results (n=805). We measured RSV antibodies by two immunoassays and performed BioFire testing on respiratory specimens.

RESULTS

Of 1,558 eligible participants, 92 (5.9%) tested positive for RSV by any diagnostic method. Combined NP/OP PCR yielded 58 positives, while separate NP and OP testing identified 11 additional positives (18.9% increase). Compared to Study NP/OP PCR alone, the addition of paired serology increased RSV detection by 42.9% (28 vs 40) among those with both specimen types, while the addition of SOC swab RT-PCR results increased RSV detection by 25.9% (47 vs 59).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of paired serology testing, SOC swab results, and separate testing of NP and OP swabs improved RSV diagnostic yield in hospitalized adults.

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [e-mail] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [e-mail].