Voltage dependence of M2 muscarinic receptor antagonists and allosteric modulators.
Allosteric modulators
Antagonists
G protein coupled receptors
Muscarinic receptors
Voltage dependence
Xenopus oocytes
Journal
Biochemical pharmacology
ISSN: 1873-2968
Titre abrégé: Biochem Pharmacol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0101032
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jul 2024
10 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
15
02
2024
revised:
12
06
2024
accepted:
09
07
2024
medline:
13
7
2024
pubmed:
13
7
2024
entrez:
12
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Muscarinic receptors are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that play a role in various physiological functions. Previous studies have shown that these receptors, along with other GPCRs, are voltage-sensitive; both their affinity toward agonists and their activation are regulated by membrane potential. To our knowledge, whether the effect of antagonists on these receptors is voltage-dependent has not yet been studied. In this study, we used Xenopus oocytes expressing the M2 muscarinic receptor (M2R) to investigate this question. Our results indicate that the potencies of two M2R antagonists, atropine and scopolamine, are voltage-dependent; they are more effective at resting potential than under depolarization. In contrast, the M2R antagonist AF-DX 386 did not exhibit voltage-dependent potency.Furthermore, we discovered that the voltage dependence of M2R activation by acetylcholine remains unchanged in the presence of two allosteric modulators, the negative modulator gallamine and the positive modulator LY2119620. These findings enhance our understanding of GPCRs' voltage dependence and may have pharmacological implications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38996933
pii: S0006-2952(24)00404-0
doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116421
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116421Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.