A multi-modal, asymmetric, weighted, and signed description of anatomical connectivity.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 08 08 2023
accepted: 01 07 2024
medline: 13 7 2024
pubmed: 13 7 2024
entrez: 12 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The macroscale connectome is the network of physical, white-matter tracts between brain areas. The connections are generally weighted and their values interpreted as measures of communication efficacy. In most applications, weights are either assigned based on imaging features-e.g. diffusion parameters-or inferred using statistical models. In reality, the ground-truth weights are unknown, motivating the exploration of alternative edge weighting schemes. Here, we explore a multi-modal, regression-based model that endows reconstructed fiber tracts with directed and signed weights. We find that the model fits observed data well, outperforming a suite of null models. The estimated weights are subject-specific and highly reliable, even when fit using relatively few training samples, and the networks maintain a number of desirable features. In summary, we offer a simple framework for weighting connectome data, demonstrating both its ease of implementation while benchmarking its utility for typical connectome analyses, including graph theoretic modeling and brain-behavior associations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38997282
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50248-6
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-50248-6
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5865

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Oh, S. W. et al. A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain. Nature 508, 207–214 (2014).
pubmed: 24695228 pmcid: 5102064 doi: 10.1038/nature13186
Shih, C.-T. et al. Connectomics-based analysis of information flow in the drosophila brain. Curr. Biol. 25, 1249–1258 (2015).
pubmed: 25866397 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.021
Varshney, L. R., Chen, B. L., Paniagua, E., Hall, D. H. & Chklovskii, D. B. Structural properties of the caenorhabditis elegans neuronal network. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001066 (2011).
pubmed: 21304930 pmcid: 3033362 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001066
Markov, N. T. et al. A weighted and directed interareal connectivity matrix for macaque cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 24, 17–36 (2014).
pubmed: 23010748 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs270
Park, B.-y et al. Signal diffusion along connectome gradients and inter-hub routing differentially contribute to dynamic human brain function. Neuroimage 224, 117429 (2021).
pubmed: 33038538 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117429
Park, H.-J. & Friston, K. Structural and functional brain networks: from connections to cognition. Science 342, 1238411 (2013).
Kumar, J. et al. Shared white-matter dysconnectivity in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with psychosis. Psychol. Med. 45, 759–770 (2015).
pubmed: 25089761 doi: 10.1017/S0033291714001810
Fornito, A., Zalesky, A. & Breakspear, M. The connectomics of brain disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 159–172 (2015).
pubmed: 25697159 doi: 10.1038/nrn3901
Sporns, O. & Zwi, J. D. The small world of the cerebral cortex. Neuroinformatics 2, 145–162 (2004).
pubmed: 15319512 doi: 10.1385/NI:2:2:145
Hagmann, P. et al. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol. 6, e159 (2008).
pubmed: 18597554 pmcid: 2443193 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060159
Van Den Heuvel, M. P. & Sporns, O. Rich-club organization of the human connectome. J. Neurosci. 31, 15775–15786 (2011).
pubmed: 22049421 pmcid: 6623027 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3539-11.2011
Sporns, O. & Betzel, R. F. Modular brain networks. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67, 613–640 (2016).
pubmed: 26393868 doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033634
Betzel, R. F. & Bassett, D. S. Specificity and robustness of long-distance connections in weighted, interareal connectomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4880–E4889 (2018).
pubmed: 29739890 pmcid: 6003515 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720186115
Bassett, D. S. & Sporns, O. Network neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 353–364 (2017).
pubmed: 28230844 pmcid: 5485642 doi: 10.1038/nn.4502
Mancini, M. et al. Introducing axonal myelination in connectomics: a preliminary analysis of g-ratio distribution in healthy subjects. NeuroImage 182, 351–359 (2018).
pubmed: 28917698 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.018
Boshkovski, T. et al. The r1-weighted connectome: complementing brain networks with a myelin-sensitive measure. Netw. Neurosci. 5, 358–372 (2021).
pubmed: 34189369 pmcid: 8233108 doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00179
Boshkovski, T. et al. The myelin-weighted connectome in parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 37, 724–733 (2022).
pubmed: 34936123 doi: 10.1002/mds.28891
Assaf, Y., Blumenfeld-Katzir, T., Yovel, Y. & Basser, P. J. Axcaliber: a method for measuring axon diameter distribution from diffusion mri. Magn. Reson. Med. 59, 1347–1354 (2008).
pubmed: 18506799 pmcid: 4667732 doi: 10.1002/mrm.21577
Honey, C. J., Kötter, R., Breakspear, M. & Sporns, O. Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10240–10245 (2007).
pubmed: 17548818 pmcid: 1891224 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701519104
Goñi, J. et al. Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 833–838 (2014).
pubmed: 24379387 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315529111
Abdelnour, F., Dayan, M., Devinsky, O., Thesen, T. & Raj, A. Functional brain connectivity is predictable from anatomic network’s laplacian eigen-structure. NeuroImage 172, 728–739 (2018).
pubmed: 29454104 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.016
Zamani Esfahlani, F., Faskowitz, J., Slack, J., Mišić, B. & Betzel, R. F. Local structure-function relationships in human brain networks across the lifespan. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–16 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29770-y
Avena-Koenigsberger, A., Misic, B. & Sporns, O. Communication dynamics in complex brain networks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 17 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.149
Gu, S. et al. Controllability of structural brain networks. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–10 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms9414
Abdelnour, F., Voss, H. U. & Raj, A. Network diffusion accurately models the relationship between structural and functional brain connectivity networks. Neuroimage 90, 335–347 (2014).
pubmed: 24384152 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.039
Betzel, R. F., Gu, S., Medaglia, J. D., Pasqualetti, F. & Bassett, D. S. Optimally controlling the human connectome: the role of network topology. Sci. Rep. 6, 30770 (2016).
pubmed: 27468904 pmcid: 4965758 doi: 10.1038/srep30770
Muldoon, S. F. et al. Stimulation-based control of dynamic brain networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005076 (2016).
pubmed: 27611328 pmcid: 5017638 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005076
Betzel, R. F. et al. The modular organization of human anatomical brain networks: accounting for the cost of wiring. Netw. Neurosci. 1, 42–68 (2017).
pubmed: 30793069 pmcid: 6372290 doi: 10.1162/NETN_a_00002
Van Essen, D. C. et al. The wu-minn human connectome project: an overview. Neuroimage 80, 62–79 (2013).
pubmed: 23684880 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041
Betzel, R. F., Griffa, A., Hagmann, P. & Mišić, B. Distance-dependent consensus thresholds for generating group-representative structural brain networks. Netw. Neurosci. 3, 475–496 (2019).
pubmed: 30984903 pmcid: 6444521 doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00075
Finn, E. S. et al. Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1664–1671 (2015).
pubmed: 26457551 pmcid: 5008686 doi: 10.1038/nn.4135
Gratton, C. et al. Functional brain networks are dominated by stable group and individual factors, not cognitive or daily variation. Neuron 98, 439–452 (2018).
pubmed: 29673485 pmcid: 5912345 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.035
Váša, F. & Mišić, B. Null models in network neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 493–504 (2022).
Schaefer, A. et al. Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity mri. Cereb. Cortex 28, 3095–3114 (2018).
pubmed: 28981612 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx179
Suárez, L. E., Markello, R. D., Betzel, R. F. & Misic, B. Linking structure and function in macroscale brain networks. Trends Cogn. Sci. 24, 302–315 (2020).
Seguin, C., Mansour L. S., Sporns, O., Zalesky, A. & Calamante, F. Network communication models narrow the gap between the modular organization of structural and functional brain networks. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.18.480871 (2022).
Rubinov, M. & Sporns, O. Weight-conserving characterization of complex functional brain networks. Neuroimage 56, 2068–2079 (2011).
pubmed: 21459148 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.069
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. 2008, P10008 (2008).
doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
Lohse, C., Bassett, D. S., Lim, K. O. & Carlson, J. M. Resolving anatomical and functional structure in human brain organization: identifying mesoscale organization in weighted network representations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003712 (2014).
pubmed: 25275860 pmcid: 4183375 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003712
Hansen, J. Y. et al. Mapping neurotransmitter systems to the structural and functional organization of the human neocortex. biorxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.28.466336 (2021).
Seguin, C., Van Den Heuvel, M. P. & Zalesky, A. Navigation of brain networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6297–6302 (2018).
pubmed: 29848631 pmcid: 6004443 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801351115
Seguin, C., Razi, A. & Zalesky, A. Inferring neural signalling directionality from undirected structural connectomes. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–13 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12201-w
Markello, R. D. & Misic, B. Comparing spatial null models for brain maps. NeuroImage 236, 118052 (2021).
Nooner, K. B. et al. The nki-rockland sample: a model for accelerating the pace of discovery science in psychiatry. Front. Neurosci. 6, 152 (2012).
pubmed: 23087608 pmcid: 3472598 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00152
Esfahlani, F. Z., Faskowitz, J., Slack, J., Mišić, B. & Betzel, R. F. Local structure-function relationships in human brain networks across the human lifespan. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.23.445128 (2021).
Geerligs, L., Maurits, N. M., Renken, R. J. & Lorist, M. M. Reduced specificity of functional connectivity in the aging brain during task performance. Hum. brain Mapp. 35, 319–330 (2014).
pubmed: 22915491 doi: 10.1002/hbm.22175
Betzel, R. F. et al. Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan. Neuroimage 102, 345–357 (2014).
pubmed: 25109530 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.067
Chan, M. Y., Park, D. C., Savalia, N. K., Petersen, S. E. & Wig, G. S. Decreased segregation of brain systems across the healthy adult lifespan. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E4997–E5006 (2014).
pubmed: 25368199 pmcid: 4246293 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415122111
Seth, A. K. & Edelman, G. M. Distinguishing causal interactions in neural populations. Neural Comput. 19, 910–933 (2007).
pubmed: 17348767 doi: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.4.910
Roebroeck, A., Formisano, E. & Goebel, R. Mapping directed influence over the brain using granger causality and fmri. Neuroimage 25, 230–242 (2005).
pubmed: 15734358 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.017
Novelli, L., Wollstadt, P., Mediano, P., Wibral, M. & Lizier, J. T. Large-scale directed network inference with multivariate transfer entropy and hierarchical statistical testing. Netw. Neurosci. 3, 827–847 (2019).
pubmed: 31410382 pmcid: 6663300 doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00092
Frässle, S. et al. Regression dcm for fmri. Neuroimage 155, 406–421 (2017).
pubmed: 28259780 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.090
Razi, A. et al. Large-scale dcms for resting-state fmri. Netw. Neurosci. 1, 222–241 (2017).
pubmed: 29400357 pmcid: 5796644 doi: 10.1162/NETN_a_00015
Novelli, L., Friston, K. & Razi, A. Spectral dynamic causal modelling: a didactic introduction and its relationship with functional connectivity. Netw. Neurosci. 8, 178–202 (2024).
Stiso, J. & Bassett, D. S. Spatial embedding imposes constraints on neuronal network architectures. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 1127–1142 (2018).
pubmed: 30449318 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.09.007
Van den Heuvel, M. P., Bullmore, E. T. & Sporns, O. Comparative connectomics. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 345–361 (2016).
pubmed: 27026480 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.001
Puxeddu, M. G., Faskowitz, J., Sporns, O., Astolfi, L. & Betzel, R. F. Multi-modal and multi-subject modular organization of human brain networks. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.26.477897 (2022).
Faskowitz, J., Betzel, R. F. & Sporns, O. Edges in brain networks: contributions to models of structure and function. Netw. Neurosci. 6, 1–28 (2022).
pubmed: 35350585 pmcid: 8942607
Sporns, O., Tononi, G. & Kötter, R. The human connectome: a structural description of the human brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 1, e42 (2005).
pubmed: 16201007 pmcid: 1239902 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042
Sporns, O. The human connectome: a complex network. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1224, 109–125 (2011).
pubmed: 21251014 doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05888.x
Sanchez-Romero, R. & Cole, M. W. Combining multiple functional connectivity methods to improve causal inferences. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 33, 180–194 (2021).
pubmed: 32427070 doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01580
O’Reilly, J. X. et al. Causal effect of disconnection lesions on interhemispheric functional connectivity in rhesus monkeys. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13982–13987 (2013).
pubmed: 23924609 pmcid: 3752223 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305062110
Honey, C. J. et al. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2035–2040 (2009).
pubmed: 19188601 pmcid: 2634800 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811168106
Deco, G., Jirsa, V. K. & McIntosh, A. R. Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 43–56 (2011).
pubmed: 21170073 doi: 10.1038/nrn2961
Kang, I., Galdo, M. & Turner, B. M. Constraining functional coactivation with a cluster-based structural connectivity network. Network Neurosci. 6, 1032–1065 (2022).
Wodeyar, A. & Srinivasan, R. Structural connectome constrained graphical lasso for meg partial coherence. Netw. Neurosci. 6, 1219–1242 (2022).
pubmed: 38800455 pmcid: 11117092 doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00267
Cole, M. W., Ito, T., Bassett, D. S. & Schultz, D. H. Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1718–1726 (2016).
pubmed: 27723746 pmcid: 5127712 doi: 10.1038/nn.4406
Hearne, L. J. et al. Activity flow underlying abnormalities in brain activations and cognition in schizophrenia. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf2513 (2021).
pubmed: 34261649 pmcid: 8279516 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf2513
Ito, T. et al. Cognitive task information is transferred between brain regions via resting-state network topology. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–14 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01000-w
Vázquez-Rodríguez, B. et al. Gradients of structure–function tethering across neocortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 21219–21227 (2019).
pubmed: 31570622 pmcid: 6800358 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903403116
Damoiseaux, J. S. & Greicius, M. D. Greater than the sum of its parts: a review of studies combining structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity. Brain Struct. Funct. 213, 525–533 (2009).
pubmed: 19565262 doi: 10.1007/s00429-009-0208-6
Rheault, F., Poulin, P., Caron, A. V., St-Onge, E. & Descoteaux, M. Common misconceptions, hidden biases and modern challenges of dmri tractography. J. Neural Eng. 17, 011001 (2020).
pubmed: 31931484 doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab6aad
Schilling, K. G. et al. Limits to anatomical accuracy of diffusion tractography using modern approaches. NeuroImage 185, 1–11 (2019).
pubmed: 30317017 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.029
Friston, K. J. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2, 56–78 (1994).
doi: 10.1002/hbm.460020107
Ip, I. B., Emir, U. E., Parker, A. J., Campbell, J. & Bridge, H. Comparison of neurochemical and bold signal contrast response functions in the human visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 39, 7968–7975 (2019).
pubmed: 31358655 pmcid: 6774413 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3021-18.2019
Buzsáki, G. Feed-forward inhibition in the hippocampal formation. Prog. Neurobiol. 22, 131–153 (1984).
pubmed: 6433403 doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(84)90023-6
Gu, H., Hu, Y., Chen, X., He, Y. & Yang, Y. Regional excitation-inhibition balance predicts default-mode network deactivation via functional connectivity. Neuroimage 185, 388–397 (2019).
pubmed: 30359729 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.055
Wagner, A. Causality in complex systems. Biol. Philos. 14, 83–101 (1999).
doi: 10.1023/A:1006580900476
Ross, L. N. & Bassett, D. S. Causation in neuroscience: keeping mechanism meaningful. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 81–90 (2024).
Seguin, C. et al. Communication dynamics in the human connectome shape the cortex-wide propagation of direct electrical stimulation. Neuron 111, 1391–1401 (2023).
pubmed: 36889313 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.01.027
Seguin, C., Sporns, O. & Zalesky, A. Brain network communication: concepts, models and applications. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 557–574 (2023).
pubmed: 37438433 doi: 10.1038/s41583-023-00718-5
Hansen, P. North-Holland mathematics studies, vol. 95, p. 201–214 (Elsevier, 1984).
Reveley, C. et al. Superficial white matter fiber systems impede detection of long-range cortical connections in diffusion mr tractography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E2820–E2828 (2015).
pubmed: 25964365 pmcid: 4450402 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418198112
Maier-Hein, K. H. et al. The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–13 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x
Swanson, L. W., Hahn, J. D. & Sporns, O. Organizing principles for the cerebral cortex network of commissural and association connections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E9692–E9701 (2017).
pubmed: 29078382 pmcid: 5692583 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712928114
Schiavi, S. et al. A new method for accurate in vivo mapping of human brain connections using microstructural and anatomical information. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba8245 (2020).
pubmed: 32789176 pmcid: 7399649 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba8245
Cieslak, M. et al. Qsiprep: an integrative platform for preprocessing and reconstructing diffusion mri data. Nat. Methods 18, 775–778 (2021).
pubmed: 34155395 pmcid: 8596781 doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01185-5
Calabrese, E., Badea, A., Cofer, G., Qi, Y. & Johnson, G. A. A diffusion mri tractography connectome of the mouse brain and comparison with neuronal tracer data. Cereb. Cortex 25, 4628–4637 (2015).
pubmed: 26048951 pmcid: 4715247 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv121
Seguin, C. et al. Communication dynamics in the human connectome shape the cortex-wide propagation of direct electrical stimulation. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.05.498875 (2022).
Veit, M. J. et al. Temporal order of signal propagation within and across intrinsic brain networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2105031118 (2021).
pubmed: 34819365 pmcid: 8640784 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105031118
Frässle, S. et al. A generative model of whole-brain effective connectivity. Neuroimage 179, 505–529 (2018).
pubmed: 29807151 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.058
Marek, S. et al. Towards reproducible brain-wide association studies. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.21.257758 (2020).
Noble, S., Mejia, A. F., Zalesky, A. & Scheinost, D. Improving power in functional magnetic resonance imaging by moving beyond cluster-level inference. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2203020119 (2022).
pubmed: 35925887 pmcid: 9371642 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2203020119
Glasser, M. F. et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the human connectome project. Neuroimage 80, 105–124 (2013).
pubmed: 23668970 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127
Robinson, E. C. et al. Msm: a new flexible framework for multimodal surface matching. Neuroimage 100, 414–426 (2014).
pubmed: 24939340 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.069
Tustison, N. J. et al. N4itk: improved n3 bias correction. IEEE Trans. Med. imaging 29, 1310–1320 (2010).
pubmed: 20378467 pmcid: 3071855 doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2046908
Garyfallidis, E. et al. Dipy, a library for the analysis of diffusion mri data. Front. Neuroinform. 8, 8 (2014).
pubmed: 24600385 pmcid: 3931231 doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00008
Tournier, J.-D., Calamante, F. & Connelly, A. Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion mri: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage 35, 1459–1472 (2007).
pubmed: 17379540 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.016
Zhang, Y., Brady, M. & Smith, S. Segmentation of brain mr images through a hidden markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20, 45–57 (2001).
pubmed: 11293691 doi: 10.1109/42.906424
Takemura, H., Caiafa, C. F., Wandell, B. A. & Pestilli, F. Ensemble tractography. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004692 (2016).
pubmed: 26845558 pmcid: 4742469 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004692
Smith, R. E., Tournier, J.-D., Calamante, F. & Connelly, A. Anatomically-constrained tractography: improved diffusion mri streamlines tractography through effective use of anatomical information. Neuroimage 62, 1924–1938 (2012).
pubmed: 22705374 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.005
Jordan, K. M., Amirbekian, B., Keshavan, A. & Henry, R. G. Cluster confidence index: a streamline-wise pathway reproducibility metric for diffusion-weighted mri tractography. J. Neuroimaging 28, 64–69 (2018).
pubmed: 28940825 doi: 10.1111/jon.12467
Cutting, J. E., Brunick, K. L. & Candan, A. Perceiving event dynamics and parsing hollywood films. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 38, 1476 (2012).
pubmed: 22449126
Esteban, O. et al. Mriqc: advancing the automatic prediction of image quality in mri from unseen sites. PLoS ONE 12, e0184661 (2017).
pubmed: 28945803 pmcid: 5612458 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184661
Roalf, D. R. et al. The impact of quality assurance assessment on diffusion tensor imaging outcomes in a large-scale population-based cohort. Neuroimage 125, 903–919 (2016).
pubmed: 26520775 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.068
Bastiani, M. et al. Automated quality control for within and between studies diffusion mri data using a non-parametric framework for movement and distortion correction. Neuroimage 184, 801–812 (2019).
pubmed: 30267859 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.073
Esteban, O. et al. fmriprep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional mri. Nat. Methods 16, 111–116 (2019).
pubmed: 30532080 doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4
Gorgolewski, K. et al. Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python. Front. Neuroinform. 5, 13 (2011).
pubmed: 21897815 pmcid: 3159964 doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00013
Abraham, A. et al. Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn. Front. Neuroinform. 8, 14 (2014).
pubmed: 24600388 pmcid: 3930868 doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00014
Klein, A. et al. Mindboggling morphometry of human brains. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005350 (2017).
pubmed: 28231282 pmcid: 5322885 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005350
Wang, S. et al. Evaluation of field map and nonlinear registration methods for correction of susceptibility artifacts in diffusion mri. Front. Neuroinform. 11, 17 (2017).
pubmed: 28270762 pmcid: 5318394 doi: 10.3389/fninf.2017.00017
Treiber, J. M. et al. Characterization and correction of geometric distortions in 814 diffusion weighted images. PLoS ONE 11, e0152472 (2016).
pubmed: 27027775 pmcid: 4814112 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152472
Greve, D. N. & Fischl, B. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage 48, 63–72 (2009).
pubmed: 19573611 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.060
Power, J. D. et al. Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fmri. Neuroimage 84, 320–341 (2014).
pubmed: 23994314 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048
Ades-Aron, B. et al. Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the diffusion parameter estimation with gibbs and noise removal pipeline. NeuroImage 183, 532–543 (2018).
pubmed: 30077743 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.066
Tournier, J.-D. et al. Mrtrix3: a fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation. NeuroImage 202, 116137 (2019).
pubmed: 31473352 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137
Andersson, J. L. & Sotiropoulos, S. N. An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion mr imaging. Neuroimage 125, 1063–1078 (2016).
pubmed: 26481672 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.019
Tax, C. M., Jeurissen, B., Vos, S. B., Viergever, M. A. & Leemans, A. Recursive calibration of the fiber response function for spherical deconvolution of diffusion mri data. Neuroimage 86, 67–80 (2014).
pubmed: 23927905 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.067
Grandjean, J. et al. Common functional networks in the mouse brain revealed by multi-centre resting-state fmri analysis. Neuroimage 205, 116278 (2020).
pubmed: 31614221 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116278
Gutierrez-Barragan, D., Basson, M. A., Panzeri, S. & Gozzi, A. Infraslow state fluctuations govern spontaneous fmri network dynamics. Curr. Biol. 29, 2295–2306 (2019).
pubmed: 31303490 pmcid: 6657681 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.017
Wang, Q. et al. The allen mouse brain common coordinate framework: a 3d reference atlas. Cell 181, 936–953 (2020).
pubmed: 32386544 pmcid: 8152789 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.007
Coletta, L. et al. Network structure of the mouse brain connectome with voxel resolution. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb7187 (2020).
pubmed: 33355124 pmcid: 11206455 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb7187
Knox, J. E. et al. High-resolution data-driven model of the mouse connectome. Netw. Neurosci. 3, 217–236 (2018).
pubmed: 30793081 pmcid: 6372022 doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00066
Rubinov, M., Ypma, R. J., Watson, C. & Bullmore, E. T. Wiring cost and topological participation of the mouse brain connectome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10032–10037 (2015).
pubmed: 26216962 pmcid: 4538676 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420315112
Newman, M. E. & Girvan, M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69, 026113 (2004).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113
Esfahlani, F. Z. et al. Modularity maximization as a flexible and generic framework for brain network exploratory analysis. Neuroimage 244, 118607 (2021).
Jeub, L. G., Sporns, O. & Fortunato, S. Multiresolution consensus clustering in networks. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–16 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21352-7
Bassett, D. S., Owens, E. T., Porter, M. A., Manning, M. L. & Daniels, K. E. Extraction of force-chain network architecture in granular materials using community detection. Soft Matter 11, 2731–2744 (2015).
pubmed: 25703651 doi: 10.1039/C4SM01821D
Galán, R. F. On how network architecture determines the dominant patterns of spontaneous neural activity. PLoS ONE 3, e2148 (2008).
pmcid: 2374893 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002148
Wang, P. et al. Inversion of a large-scale circuit model reveals a cortical hierarchy in the dynamic resting human brain. Sci. Adv. 5, eaat7854 (2019).
pubmed: 30662942 pmcid: 6326747 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat7854
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L. & Penny, W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 19, 1273–1302 (2003).
pubmed: 12948688 doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7

Auteurs

Jacob Tanner (J)

Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Joshua Faskowitz (J)

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Andreia Sofia Teixeira (AS)

LASIGE, Departamento de Informática, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Caio Seguin (C)

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Ludovico Coletta (L)

Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy.

Alessandro Gozzi (A)

Functional Neuroimaging Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems, Rovereto, Italy.

Bratislav Mišić (B)

McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.

Richard F Betzel (RF)

Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. rbetzel@indiana.edu.
School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. rbetzel@indiana.edu.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. rbetzel@indiana.edu.
Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. rbetzel@indiana.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH