Psychological and ethical issues raised by genomic in paediatric care pathway, a qualitative analysis with parents and childhood cancer patients.
Journal
European journal of human genetics : EJHG
ISSN: 1476-5438
Titre abrégé: Eur J Hum Genet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9302235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jul 2024
13 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
06
12
2023
accepted:
17
06
2024
revised:
27
05
2024
medline:
13
7
2024
pubmed:
13
7
2024
entrez:
12
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In paediatric oncology, genomics raises new ethical, legal and psychological issues, as somatic and constitutional situations intersect throughout the care pathway. The discovery of potential predisposition in this context is sometimes carried out outside the usual framework. This article focuses on the views of children, adolescents, and young adults (AYA) with cancer and their parents about their experience with genomic testing. Forty-eight semi-structured interviews were performed with children or AYAs with cancer and one of their parents, before and/or after receiving the genetic test results. The interviews were fully transcribed, coded and thematically analysed using an inductive method. This analysis revealed several themes that are key issues: perceived understanding and consenting, apprehension about the test outcomes (expectations and fears), perception and attitude towards incidental findings. The main expectation was an aetiological explanation. Children and AYAs also emphasised the altruistic meaning of genetic testing, while parents seemed to expect a therapeutic and preventive approach for their child and the rest of the family. Parents were more concerned about a family risk, while patients were more afraid of cancer relapse or transmission to their descendants. Both groups suggested possible feelings of guilt concerning family transmission and imaginary representations of what genomics may allow. Incidental findings were not understood by patients, while some parents perceived the related issues and hesitated between wanting or not to know. A multidisciplinary approach would be an interesting way to help parents and children and AYAs to better grasp the complexity of genetic and/or genomic testing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38997469
doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01653-4
pii: 10.1038/s41431-024-01653-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Institut National Du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute)
ID : 2018-2022 SHS-127
Organisme : Institut National Du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute)
ID : 2022-2026 Chaire EMPWT 16048
Organisme : Institut National Du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute)
ID : 2018-127
Organisme : Institut National Du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute)
ID : 2018-127
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
ABM Agence de Biomédecine. [Draft recommendations for good professional practice concerning the management of the results of a genome-wide sequencing examination not directly related to the initial indication in the context of care]. 2020. https://www.agence-biomedecine.fr/Conseil-d-orientation-126 .
Kratz CP, Jongmans MC, Cavé H, Wimmer K, Behjati S, Guerrini-Rousseau L, et al. Predisposition to cancer in children and AYAs and adolescents. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021;5:142–54.
doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30275-3
pubmed: 33484663
Mandrell BN, Gattuso JS, Pritchard M, Caples M, Howard Sharp KM, Harrison L, et al. Knowledge is power: benefits, risks, hopes, and decision-making reported by parents consenting to next-generation sequencing for children and adolescents with cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2021;37:151–67.
doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151167
Bertier G, Sénécal K, Borry P, Vears DF. Unsolved challenges in pediatric whole-exome sequencing: a literature analysis. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2017;54:134–42.
doi: 10.1080/10408363.2016.1275516
pubmed: 28132577
Botkin JR, Belmont JW, Berg JS, Berkman BE, Bombard Y, Holm IA, et al. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97:6–21.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.05.022
pubmed: 26140447
pmcid: 4570999
Chassagne A, Pélissier A, Houdayer F, Cretin E, Gautier E, Salvi D, et al. Exome sequencing in clinical settings: preferences and experiences of parents of children with rare diseases (SEQUAPRE study). Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27:701–10.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0332-y
pubmed: 30710147
pmcid: 6461801
Houdayer F, Putois O, Babonneau ML, Chaumet H, Joly L, Juif C, et al. Secondary findings from next generation sequencing: psychological and ethical issues. Family and patient perspectives. Eur J Med Genet. 2019;62:103711.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103711
pubmed: 31265899
Wade CH, Tarini BA, Wilfond BS. Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2013;14:535–55.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153425
pubmed: 23875800
pmcid: 4159555
Kalia SS, Adelman K, Bale SJ, Chung WK, Eng C, Evans JP, et al. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2017;19:249–55.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.190
pubmed: 27854360
Frey MK, Lee SS, Gerber D, Schwartz ZP, Martineau J, Lutz K, et al. Facilitated referral pathway for genetic testing at the time of ovarian cancer diagnosis: uptake of genetic counseling and testing and impact on patient-reported stress, anxiety and depression. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;157:280–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.007
pubmed: 32057464
Forbes C, Fayter D, de Kock S, Quek RGW. A systematic review of international guidelines and recommendations for the genetic screening, diagnosis, genetic counseling, and treatment of BRCA-mutated breast cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:2321–37.
doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S189627
pubmed: 30962720
pmcid: 6434912
Matthijs G, Souche E, Alders M, Corveleyn A, Eck S, Feenstra I, et al. Guidelines for diagnostic next-generation sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:2–5.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.226
pubmed: 26508566
van El CG, Cornel MC, Borry P, Hastings RJ, Fellmann F, Hodgson SV, et al. Whole-genome sequencing in health care. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:580–4.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.46
pubmed: 23676617
pmcid: 3658192
Droin-Mollard M, Hervouet L, Lahlou-Laforet K, de Montgolfier S. Narrative review on ethical and psychological issues raised by genetic and genomic testing in pediatric oncology care. J Genet Couns. 2024 (under review)
Ferrari A, Stark D, Peccatori FA, Fern L, Laurence V, Gaspar N, et al. Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer: a position paper from the AYA Working Group of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE). ESMO Open. 2021;6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100096 .
Berlanga P, Pierron G, Lacroix L, Chicard M, Adam de Beaumais T, Marchais A, et al. The European MAPPYACTS trial: precision medicine program in pediatric and adolescent patients with recurrent malignancies. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:1266–81.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1136
pubmed: 35292802
pmcid: 9394403
Lahlou-Laforêt K, Consoli SM, Jeunemaitre X, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP. Presymptomatic genetic testing in minors at risk of paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma: our experience of oncogenetic multidisciplinary consultation. Horm Metab Res. 2012;44:354–8.
doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1311568
pubmed: 22517555
Paillé P, Mucchielli A. Qualitative analysis in the humanities and social sciences. Armand Colin publisher, Paris, France. 2012. https://doi.org/10.3917/arco.paill.2012.01 .
de Montgolfier S, Hervouet L. [Imagination as a methodological lever for mobilizing ethical questioning: how can children with cancer and their parents be encouraged to think about the issues involved in consenting to genomic research?]. Rev Fr Ethique Appl. 2022;12:37–52.
Droin-Mollard M, Hervouet L, Lahlou-Laforêt K, de Montgolfier S. [Genomic propositions in oncopediatry: disruption of temporalities and ethical reference points—patients’, parents’ and professionals’ perspectives. Dolbeault]. S, Seigneur E, éditeurs. Psycho-Oncol. 2021;15:152–7.
doi: 10.3166/pson-2022-0176
de Montgolfier S, Hervouet L, Le Tirant S, Rial-Sebbag E. [Integrating the child’s opinion in care decisions: the case of consent to genetic investigations in oncopediatrics]. Anthropol Santé. 2021. https://doi.org/10.4000/anthropologiesante.9269 .
Claret B, Brugières L, Guerrini-Rousseau L, Dauchy S, Gargiulo M. [Paediatric oncogenetic consultations: what place should be given to the child? How should we communicate with the child and his or her parents?]. Psycho-Oncol. 2018;12:46–9.
doi: 10.3166/pson-2018-0023
Vibert R, Lahlou-Laforêt K, Samadi M, Krivosic V, Blanc T, Amar L, et al. Minors at risk of von Hippel-Lindau disease: 10 years’ experience of predictive genetic testing and follow-up adherence. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30:1171–7.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01157-z
pubmed: 35918537
pmcid: 9553881
Johnson LM, Sykes AD, Lu Z, Valdez JM, Gattuso J, Gerhardt E, et al. Speaking genomics to parents offered germline testing for cancer predisposition: use of a 2-visit consent model. Cancer. 2019;125:2455–64.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.32071
pubmed: 30901077
Simaga F, Bourdeaut F, Aerts I, Bouchoucha Y, Cordero C, Delattre O, et al. [Assessment of one year’s activity of systematic genetic information consultations in paediatric oncology in the era of very high throughput sequencing]. [Internet]. Rennes, France: 11ème Assises de la génétique humaines; 2022. https://assises2022.mycongressonline.net/Doc-Agenda_pdf.html .
Weber E, Shuman C, Wasserman JD, Barrera M, Patenaude AF, Fung K, et al. “A change in perspective”: exploring the experiences of adolescents with hereditary tumor predisposition. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66:e27445.
doi: 10.1002/pbc.27445
pubmed: 30207072
Waldman L, Hancock K, Gallinger B, Johnstone B, Brunga L, Malkin D, et al. Perspectives and Experiences of Parents and Adolescents Who Participate in a Pediatric Precision Oncology Program: “When You Feel Helpless, This Kind of Thing Is Very Helpful”. JCO Precision Oncology 2022;6:e2100444.
Johnson LM, Mandrell BN, Li C, Lu Z, Gattuso J, Harrison LW, et al. Managing Pandora’s box: familial expectations around the return of (future) germline results. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022;13:152–65.
doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2063994
pubmed: 35471132