Stereotactic radiosurgery versus combined stereotactic radiosurgery and bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma; a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival.
Bevacizumab
Meta-analysis
Recurrent glioblastoma
Stereotactic radiosurgery
Survival outcomes
Journal
Neurosurgical review
ISSN: 1437-2320
Titre abrégé: Neurosurg Rev
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7908181
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jul 2024
13 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
28
12
2023
accepted:
08
07
2024
revised:
21
05
2024
medline:
14
7
2024
pubmed:
14
7
2024
entrez:
13
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) is a brain tumor that is resistant to standard treatments. Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive radiation technique, it cannot fully prevent tumor recurrence and progression. Bevacizumab blocks tumor blood supply and has been approved for rGBM. However, the best way to combine SRS and bevacizumab is still unclear. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing SRS alone and SRS plus bevacizumab for rGBM. We searched three databases for articles published until June 2023. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA v.17. Our meta-analysis included 20 studies with 926 patients. We found that the combination therapy had a significantly lower rate of overall survival (OS) than SRS alone at 6-month 0.77[95%CI:0.74-0.85] for SRS alone and (100%) for SRS plus bevacizumab. At 1-year OS, 0.39 [95%CI: 0.32-0.47] for SRS alone and 0.61 [95%CI:0.44-0.77] for SRS plus bevacizumab (P-value:0.02). However, this advantage was not seen in the long term (18 months and two years). Additionally, the combination therapy had lower chances of progression-free survival (PFS) than SRS alone at the 6-month and 1-year time points, but the differences were insignificant. Our study indicates that incorporating bevacizumab with SRS may lead to a short-term increase in OS for rGBM patients but not long-term. Additionally, the PFS rate did not show significant improvement in the group receiving combination therapy. Further clinical trials are necessary to validate the enhanced overall survival with combination therapy for rGBM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39002028
doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02585-9
pii: 10.1007/s10143-024-02585-9
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
323Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Zhang T, Xin Q, Kang JM (2021) Bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 25(21):6480–6491
pubmed: 34787852
Sneed PK et al (1994) Patterns of recurrence of glioblastoma multiforme after external irradiation followed by implant boost. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 29(4):719–727
pubmed: 8040017
doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90559-2
Seystahl K, Wick W, Weller M (2016) Therapeutic options in recurrent glioblastoma–An update. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 99:389–408
pubmed: 26830009
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.01.018
Biswas T et al (2009) Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol 4:11
pubmed: 19292912
pmcid: 2662864
doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-4-11
Combs SE et al (2005) Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS): treatment option for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Cancer 104(10):2168–2173
pubmed: 16220556
doi: 10.1002/cncr.21429
Kong DS et al (2008) Efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery as a salvage treatment for recurrent malignant gliomas. Cancer 112(9):2046–2051
pubmed: 18338759
doi: 10.1002/cncr.23402
Ferrara N (2005) VEGF as a therapeutic target in cancer. Oncology 69(Suppl 3):11–16
pubmed: 16301831
doi: 10.1159/000088479
Hurwitz H et al (2004) Bevacizumab plus Irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350(23):2335–2342
pubmed: 15175435
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032691
Miller K et al (2007) Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 357(26):2666–2676
pubmed: 18160686
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072113
Gorski DH et al (1999) Blockage of the vascular endothelial growth factor stress response increases the antitumor effects of ionizing radiation. Cancer Res 59(14):3374–3378
pubmed: 10416597
Moeller BJ et al (2004) Radiation activates HIF-1 to regulate vascular radiosensitivity in tumors: role of reoxygenation, free radicals, and stress granules. Cancer Cell 5(5):429–441
pubmed: 15144951
doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(04)00115-1
Park KJ et al (2012) Salvage gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery followed by bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a case-control study. J Neurooncol 107(2):323–333
pubmed: 22057917
doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0744-9
Matthew JP et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71
Deeks JJ et al (2019) Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses, in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. pp. 241–284
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E (2023) Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice. Fifth edition. ed. Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer
Glavatskyi OY et al (2022) RADIOSURGICAL TREATMENT OF RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AFFECTING TREATMENT OUTCOMES. Exp Oncol 44(4):307–313
pubmed: 36811543
Lovo EE et al (2021) Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: a retrospective multi-institutional experience. Cureus, 13(10)
Dono A et al (2021) Genomic alterations predictive of response to radiosurgery in recurrent IDH-WT glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 152:153–162
pubmed: 33492602
pmcid: 8354320
doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03689-0
Morris S-AL et al (2019) Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 127:e523–e533
pubmed: 30954746
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.193
Sharma M et al (2018) Outcomes and prognostic stratification of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with salvage stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 131(2):489–499
pubmed: 30485180
doi: 10.3171/2018.4.JNS172909
Guseynova K et al (2018) Gamma knife radiosurgery for local recurrence of glioblastoma. Neuroendocrinol Lett 39(4):281–287
pubmed: 30531701
Imber BS et al (2017) Indications and efficacy of gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma: 2 decades of institutional experience. Neurosurgery 80(1):129
pubmed: 27428784
doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001344
Holt DE et al (2016) Salvage stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme with prior radiation therapy. J Cancer Res Ther 12(4):1243–1248
pubmed: 28169234
doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.199537
Kim HR et al (2015) Outcome of salvage treatment for recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Neurosci 22(3):468–473
pubmed: 25595963
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.09.018
Martínez-Carrillo M et al (2014) Salvage radiosurgery for selected patients with recurrent malignant gliomas BioMed Research International, 2014
Skeie BS et al (2012) Gamma knife surgery versus reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. World Neurosurg 78(6):658–669
pubmed: 22484078
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.03.024
Park K-J et al (2012) Salvage gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery followed by bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a case–control study. J Neurooncol 107:323–333
pubmed: 22057917
doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0744-9
Koga T et al (2012) Extended field stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma. Cancer 118(17):4193–4200
pubmed: 22180028
doi: 10.1002/cncr.27372
Sirin S et al (2011) Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery in recurrent glioblastoma: a single center experience. Vojnosanit Pregl 68(11):961–966
pubmed: 22191314
doi: 10.2298/VSP1111961S
Wegner R et al (2009) Re-irradiation with Radiosurgery for recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: a single Institution’s Retrospective Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(3):S694–S695
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1583
Patel M et al (2009) Salvage reirradiation for recurrent glioblastoma with radiosurgery: radiographic response and improved survival. J Neurooncol 92:185–191
pubmed: 19066727
doi: 10.1007/s11060-008-9752-9
Mahajan A et al (2005) Case—control study of stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurosurg 103(2):210–217
pubmed: 16175848
doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.2.0210
Combs SE et al (2005) Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment option for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Cancer: Interdisciplinary Int J Am Cancer Soc 104(10):2168–2173
doi: 10.1002/cncr.21429
Shibli Z et al (2023) PET-CT guided Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme Recurrent Cases in Pakistan. Pakistan J Neurol Surg 27(2):251–258
doi: 10.36552/pjns.v27i2.851
Griazov A et al (2022) Survival after stereotactic radiosurgery of recurrent glioblastomas in patients with radical resection of primary tumor
Gryazov AB, Zemskova OV, Gryazov AA (2022) Stages of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of recurrent glioblastomas. Ukrainian Neurosurgical J 28:N2
doi: 10.25305/unj.257785
Glavatskyi OY et al (2021) Current state of antiangiogenic therapy in neuro-oncology and own experience of its use in the radiosurgical treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Ukrainian Neurosurgical J 27(1):34–43
doi: 10.25305/unj.223479
Cheon Y-J et al (2018) Efficacy of gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrent high-grade gliomas with limited tumor volume. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 61(4):516–524
pubmed: 29991111
pmcid: 6046572
doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0259
Sutera PA et al (2017) Salvage stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent gliomas with prior radiation therapy. Future Oncol 13(29):2681–2690
pubmed: 29198146
doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0226
Sadik ZHA et al (2018) Gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrent gliomas. J Neurooncol 140(3):615–622
pubmed: 30191361
pmcid: 6267255
doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2988-0
Cabrera AR et al (2013) Concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery and bevacizumab in recurrent malignant gliomas: a prospective trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 86(5):873–879
pubmed: 23725997
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.04.029
Cuneo KC et al (2012) Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery and adjuvant bevacizumab in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(5):2018–2024
pubmed: 21489708
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.074
Torok J et al (2011) Re-irradiation with radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Technol Cancer Res Treat 10(3):253–258
pubmed: 21517131
doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500200
Maranzano E et al (2011) Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma with stereotactic radiotherapy: long-term results of a mono-institutional trial. Tumori J 97(1):56–61
doi: 10.1177/030089161109700111
Villavicencio AT et al (2009) Survival following stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a multicenter experience. Neurosurg Rev 32:417–424
pubmed: 19633875
doi: 10.1007/s10143-009-0212-6
Park JL et al (2000) Survival after stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Radiosurgery 3:169–175
doi: 10.1023/A:1009542525044
Frischer JM et al (2016) Gamma knife radiosurgery in recurrent glioblastoma. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 94(4):265–272
pubmed: 27721311
doi: 10.1159/000448924
Mantica M et al (2023) Phase II study of border zone stereotactic radiosurgery with bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or progressive glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 164(1):179–190
pubmed: 37515669
doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04398-0
Chen Y et al (2021) Bevacizumab combined with S-1 and raltitrexed for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: a phase II study. Oncologist 26(8):e1320–e1326
pubmed: 33830591
pmcid: 8342567
doi: 10.1002/onco.13778
Nie K-k et al (2016) Clinical observation of bevacizumab combined with S-1 in the treatment of pretreated advanced esophageal carcinoma. Chin Med Sci J 31(4):221–227
pubmed: 28065218
doi: 10.1016/S1001-9294(17)30004-4
Saijo N (2010) Treatment with antiangiogenic drugs Nihon Rinsho. Japanese J Clin Med 68(6):1007–1013
Simon T et al (2018) Shedding of bevacizumab in tumour cells-derived extracellular vesicles as a new therapeutic escape mechanism in glioblastoma. Mol Cancer 17(1):1–7
doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0878-x
Ramezani S et al (2019) The role of kinase signaling in resistance to bevacizumab therapy for glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 34(6):345–354
pubmed: 31411929
Yu Z et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for the treatment of glioblastoma. Experimental Therapeutic Med 11(2):371–380
doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2947
Simon T et al (2014) Direct effect of bevacizumab on glioblastoma cell lines in vitro. Neuromol Med 16:752–771
doi: 10.1007/s12017-014-8324-8
Norden AD, Drappatz J, Wen PY (2008) Novel anti-angiogenic therapies for malignant gliomas. Lancet Neurol 7(12):1152–1160
pubmed: 19007739
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70260-6
Nagane M (2014) Anti-angiogenic therapy for malignant glioma Gan to Kagaku Ryoho. Cancer Chemother 41(2):141–147
Bozec A et al (2007) Combined effect of bevacizumab with erlotinib and irradiation in head and neck cancer. A preclinical study on an orthotopic model. Cancer Res 67(9Supplement):4109–4109
Bozec A et al (2008) Combined effects of bevacizumab with erlotinib and irradiation: a preclinical study on a head and neck cancer orthotopic model. Br J Cancer 99(1):93–99
pubmed: 18577994
pmcid: 2453013
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604429
Junck L (2011) Bevacizumab antiangiogenic therapy for glioblastoma. AAN Enterprises. p. 414–415
Abbassy M et al (2018) Phase I trial of radiosurgery dose escalation plus bevacizumab in patients with recurrent/progressive glioblastoma. Neurosurgery 83(3):385–392
pubmed: 28973311
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx369
Jakobsen JN et al (2011) Irinotecan and Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Expert Opin Pharmacother 12(5):825–833
pubmed: 21385110
doi: 10.1517/14656566.2011.566558
Park JK et al (2010) Scale to predict survival after surgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 28(24):3838
pubmed: 20644085
pmcid: 2940401
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.0582
Mandl ES et al (2008) Repeated surgery for glioblastoma multiforme: only in combination with other salvage therapy. Surg Neurol 69(5):506–509
pubmed: 18262245
doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.03.043
Pinsker M, Lumenta C (2001) Experiences with reoperation on recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Zentralblatt für Neurochirurgie 62(02):43–47
pubmed: 11786935
Ammirati M et al (1987) Reoperation in the treatment of recurrent intracranial malignant gliomas. Neurosurgery 21(5):607–614
pubmed: 2827051
doi: 10.1227/00006123-198711000-00001
Landy HJ et al (1994) Retreatment of intracranial gliomas. South Med J 87(2):211–214
pubmed: 8115886
doi: 10.1097/00007611-199402000-00013
Keles GE, Anderson B, Berger MS (1999) The effect of extent of resection on time to tumor progression and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme of the cerebral hemisphere. Surg Neurol 52(4):371–379
pubmed: 10555843
doi: 10.1016/S0090-3019(99)00103-2
Nieder C et al (2005) Treatment of unresectable glioblastoma multiforme. Anticancer Res 25(6 C):4605–4610
pubmed: 16334150
Komotar RJ et al (2008) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma—A critical review. Clin Med Oncol 2:CMO
Zhang JF et al (2024) Bevacizumab and gamma knife radiosurgery for first-recurrence glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 166(1):89–98
pubmed: 38175460
pmcid: 10824796
doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04524-y
Gilbert MR et al (2014) A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370(8):699–708
pubmed: 24552317
pmcid: 4201043
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308573
Souhami L et al (2004) Randomized comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery followed by conventional radiotherapy with carmustine to conventional radiotherapy with carmustine for patients with glioblastoma multiforme: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 93 – 05 protocol. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(3):853–860
pubmed: 15465203
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.011
Bunevicius A et al (2021) Stereotactic radiosurgery for IDH wild type glioblastoma: an international, multicenter study. J Neurooncol 155(3):343–351
pubmed: 34797526
doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03883-8
Bunevicius A et al (2022) Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma considering tumor genetic profiles: an international multicenter study. J Neurosurg 137(1):42–50
pubmed: 34740186
doi: 10.3171/2021.7.JNS211277
Sheehan JP, Mantziaris G, Bunevicius A (2024) Stereotactic radiosurgery and bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 167(1):231–232
pubmed: 38363492
doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04592-8
Zhang G, Huang S, Wang Z (2012) A meta-analysis of bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Neurosci 19(12):1636–1640
pubmed: 23047061
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.12.028
Clark GM et al (2014) Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas: the University of Alabama at Birmingham experience. Neuro-oncology Pract 1(4):172–177
doi: 10.1093/nop/npu028
Minniti G et al (2015) Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in combination with bevacizumab or fotemustine for patients with progressive malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol 122:559–566
pubmed: 25702193
doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1745-x
Souhami L et al (2004) Randomized comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery followed by conventional radiotherapy with carmustine to conventional radiotherapy with carmustine for patients with glioblastoma multiforme: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 93 – 05 protocol. Int J Radiation Oncology* Biology* Phys 60(3):853–860
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.011
Sahebjam S et al (2021) Hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas: results from a phase I study. Neurooncology 23(4):677–686
Zhao M et al (2018) Bevacizumab and stereotactic radiosurgery achieved complete response for pediatric recurrent medulloblastoma. J Cancer Res Ther 14(Suppl 3):S789–S792
pubmed: 30249905
Narita Y (2013) Drug review: safety and efficacy of bevacizumab for glioblastoma and other brain tumors. Jpn J Clin Oncol 43(6):587–595
pubmed: 23585688
doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyt051