GateNet: A novel neural network architecture for automated flow cytometry gating.

Flow cytometry Gating Machine learning Neural network

Journal

Computers in biology and medicine
ISSN: 1879-0534
Titre abrégé: Comput Biol Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1250250

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 19 01 2024
revised: 12 06 2024
accepted: 25 06 2024
medline: 14 7 2024
pubmed: 14 7 2024
entrez: 13 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Flow cytometry is a widely used technique for identifying cell populations in patient-derived fluids, such as peripheral blood (PB) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Despite its ubiquity in research and clinical practice, the process of gating, i.e., manually identifying cell types, is labor-intensive and error-prone. The objective of this study is to address this challenge by introducing GateNet, a neural network architecture designed for fully end-to-end automated gating without the need for correcting batch effects. For this study a unique dataset is used which comprises over 8,000,000 events from N = 127 PB and CSF samples which were manually labeled independently by four experts. Applying cross-validation, the classification performance of GateNet is compared to the human experts performance. Additionally, GateNet is applied to a publicly available dataset to evaluate generalization. The classification performance is measured using the F1 score. GateNet achieves F1 scores ranging from 0.910 to 0.997 demonstrating human-level performance on samples unseen during training. In the publicly available dataset, GateNet confirms its generalization capabilities with an F1 score of 0.936. Importantly, we also show that GateNet only requires ≈10 samples to reach human-level performance. Finally, gating with GateNet only takes 15 microseconds per event utilizing graphics processing units (GPU). GateNet enables fully end-to-end automated gating in flow cytometry, overcoming the labor-intensive and error-prone nature of manual adjustments. The neural network achieves human-level performance on unseen samples and generalizes well to diverse datasets. Notably, its data efficiency, requiring only ∼10 samples to reach human-level performance, positions GateNet as a widely applicable tool across various domains of flow cytometry.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Flow cytometry is a widely used technique for identifying cell populations in patient-derived fluids, such as peripheral blood (PB) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Despite its ubiquity in research and clinical practice, the process of gating, i.e., manually identifying cell types, is labor-intensive and error-prone. The objective of this study is to address this challenge by introducing GateNet, a neural network architecture designed for fully end-to-end automated gating without the need for correcting batch effects.
METHODS METHODS
For this study a unique dataset is used which comprises over 8,000,000 events from N = 127 PB and CSF samples which were manually labeled independently by four experts. Applying cross-validation, the classification performance of GateNet is compared to the human experts performance. Additionally, GateNet is applied to a publicly available dataset to evaluate generalization. The classification performance is measured using the F1 score.
RESULTS RESULTS
GateNet achieves F1 scores ranging from 0.910 to 0.997 demonstrating human-level performance on samples unseen during training. In the publicly available dataset, GateNet confirms its generalization capabilities with an F1 score of 0.936. Importantly, we also show that GateNet only requires ≈10 samples to reach human-level performance. Finally, gating with GateNet only takes 15 microseconds per event utilizing graphics processing units (GPU).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
GateNet enables fully end-to-end automated gating in flow cytometry, overcoming the labor-intensive and error-prone nature of manual adjustments. The neural network achieves human-level performance on unseen samples and generalizes well to diverse datasets. Notably, its data efficiency, requiring only ∼10 samples to reach human-level performance, positions GateNet as a widely applicable tool across various domains of flow cytometry.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39002319
pii: S0010-4825(24)00905-3
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108820
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

108820

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest We, the undersigned, confirm that the manuscript represents our own work, is original and has not been copyrighted, published, submitted, or accepted for publication elsewhere. We further confirm that we all have fully read the manuscript and give consent to be co-authors of the manuscript.

Auteurs

Lukas Fisch (L)

University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany. Electronic address: l.fisch@uni-muenster.de.

Michael Heming (M)

Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Andreas Schulte-Mecklenbeck (A)

Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Catharina C Gross (CC)

Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Stefan Zumdick (S)

University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany.

Carlotta Barkhau (C)

University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany.

Daniel Emden (D)

University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany.

Jan Ernsting (J)

University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany; Institute for Geoinformatics, University of Münster, Germany; Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Münster, Germany.

Ramona Leenings (R)

University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany.

Kelvin Sarink (K)

University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany.

Nils R Winter (NR)

University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany.

Udo Dannlowski (U)

University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany.

Heinz Wiendl (H)

Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Gerd Meyer Zu Hörste (GMZ)

Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University and University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Tim Hahn (T)

University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry, Münster, Germany.

Classifications MeSH