High early mortality following percutaneous nephrostomy in metastatic cancer: a national analysis of outcomes.

Cancer Clinical decisions End of life care Genitourinary Palliative Care Quality of life

Journal

BMJ supportive & palliative care
ISSN: 2045-4368
Titre abrégé: BMJ Support Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101565123

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 17 04 2024
accepted: 21 05 2024
medline: 14 7 2024
pubmed: 14 7 2024
entrez: 13 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To assess the outcomes of percutaneous nephrostomy in England for renal decompression, in the context of metastatic cancer. Retrospective observational study of all patients undergoing nephrostomy with a diagnosis of metastatic cancer from 2010 to 2019 in England, identified and followed up within Hospital Episode Statistics.The primary outcome measure was mortality (14-day and 30-day postprocedure). Secondary outcomes included subsequent chemotherapy or surgery and direct complications of nephrostomy. 10 932 patients were identified: 58.0% were male, 51.0% were >70 years old and 57.7% had no relevant comorbidities (according to Charlson's criteria, other than cancer).1 in 15 patients died within 14 days of nephrostomy and 1 in 6 died within 30 days. Factors associated with higher 30-day mortality were the presence of comorbidities (Charlson score 1-4 (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.50, p=0.003), score 5+ (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.45), p<0.001)); inpatient nephrostomy (OR 3.76, 95% CI 2.75 to 5.14, p<0.001) and admitted under the care of specialities of internal medicine (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.84 to 2.40, p<0.001), oncology (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.15, p<0.001), gynaecology/gynaeoncology (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.28, p=0.002) or general surgery (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.98, p<0.001)), compared with urology.25.4% received subsequent chemotherapy. Receiving chemotherapy was associated with younger patients (eg, age 18-29 (OR 4.04, 95% CI 2.66 to 6.12, p<0.001) and age 30-39 (OR 3.07, 95% CI 2.37 to 3.97, p<0.001)) and under the care of oncology (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.83, p<0.001) or gynaecology/gynaeoncology (OR 1.64, 95%CI 1.28 to 2.10, p<0.001) compared with urology.43.8% had subsequent abdominopelvic surgery. Not receiving surgery was associated with inpatient nephrostomy (OR 0.82, 95%CI 0.72 to 0.95,p=0.007): non-genitourinary cancers (eg, gynaecology/gynaeoncology cancer (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.99, p=0.037)); and under the care of a non-surgical specialty (medicine (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.77, p<0.001), oncology (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.66, p<0.001)).24.5% of patients had at least one direct complication of nephrostomy: 12.5% required early exchange of nephrostomy, 8.1% had bleeding and 6.7% had pyelonephritis. The decision to undertake nephrostomy in patients with poor prognosis cancer is complex and should be undertaken in a multidisciplinary team setting. Complication rates are high and minimal survival benefit is derived in many patients, especially in the context of emergency inpatient care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39002950
pii: spcare-2024-004937
doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004937
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Amandeep Dosanjh (A)

University of Birmingham Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Birmingham, UK.

Benjamin Coupland (B)

Research and Development, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Jemma Mytton (J)

Research and Development, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Dominic Stephen King (DS)

Department of Gastroenterology, The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, West Midlands, UK.

Harriet Mintz (H)

School of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Anna Lock (A)

Department of Palliative Care, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Veronica Nanton (V)

Department of Social Sciences and Systems in Health, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Param Mariappan (P)

Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery (EBCS), Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

Nigel Trudgill (N)

University of Birmingham Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Prashant Patel (P)

University of Birmingham Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Birmingham, UK p.patel@bham.ac.uk.
Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH