Maxillary arch dimensions in bilateral cleft lip and palate in the age 0-5 months.
cleft lip
cleft palate
dental models
Journal
Orthodontics & craniofacial research
ISSN: 1601-6343
Titre abrégé: Orthod Craniofac Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101144387
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Jul 2024
14 Jul 2024
Historique:
revised:
07
06
2024
received:
06
11
2023
accepted:
04
07
2024
medline:
14
7
2024
pubmed:
14
7
2024
entrez:
14
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) divides the maxillary arch into three segments, separated from each other, resulting in abnormal growth of the alveolar arch. This study evaluated the maxillary arch dimensions in BCLP and compared them with neonates without craniofacial anomalies. This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary cleft centre. Sixty-six neonates aged 0-5 months were divided into two groups: cleft group-children with BCLP (23 boys and 18 girls) and control group-children without craniofacial deformities (15 boys and 10 girls). The dental models were processed by a 3D scanner. Landmarks were marked to achieve inter-canine distance, inter-tuberosity distance and arch length measurements. t-Tests were used for intergroup comparisons (p < .05). The maxillary cleft arch was demonstrated to be wider and longer in the posterior region compared to the control group. The inter-canine distance did not present differences between the cleft and controls. The inter-canine distance of the control group was the only measurement influenced by the variable sex. The cleft significantly interfered with the arch posterior width and arch sagittal length, making them larger. There was no statistical difference in the measurements between sex in the cleft group.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Dixon MJ, Marazita ML, Beaty TH, Murray JC. Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(3):167‐178.
Drillien CM, Jameson S, Wilkinson EM. Studies in mental handicap. I. Prevalence and distribution by clinical type and severity of defect. Arch Dis Child. 1966;41(219):528‐538.
Heidbuchel KL, Kuijpers‐Jagtman AM, Kramer GJ, Prahl‐Andersen B. Maxillary arch dimensions in bilateral cleft lip and palate from birth until four years of age in boys. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35(3):233‐239.
Huddart AG. Maxillary arch dimensions in bilateral cleft lip and palate subjects. Cleft Palate J. 1970;7:139‐155.
Pruzansky S. The growth of the premaxillary‐vomerine complex in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Tandlaegebladet. 1971;75(12):1157‐1169.
Harding RL, Mazaheri M. Growth and spatial changes in the arch form in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972;50(6):591‐599.
Freitas JA, Das Neves LT, De Almeida AL, et al. Rehabilitative treatment of cleft lip and palate: experience of the Hospital for Rehabilitation of craniofacial anomalies/USP (HRAC/USP)—part 1: overall aspects. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(1):9‐15.
Asquith JA, McIntyre GT. Dental arch relationships on three‐dimensional digital study models and conventional plaster study models for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(5):530‐534.
Boldt F, Weinzierl C, Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U. Comparison of the spatial landmark scatter of various 3D digitalization methods. J Orofac Orthop. 2009;70(3):247‐263.
Braumann B, Rosenhayn SE, Bourauel C, Jager A. Two‐ or three‐dimensional cast analysis in patients with cleft lip and palate? J Orofac Orthop. 2001;62(6):451‐465.
Costalos PA, Sarraf K, Cangialosi TJ, Efstratiadis S. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(5):624‐629.
Joffe L. OrthoCAD: digital models for a digital era. J Orthod. 2004;31(4):344‐347.
Krey KF, Borngen J, Dannhauer KH. Three‐dimensional analysis of the deciduous dentition of patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate and delayed cleft closure. J Orofac Orthop. 2009;70(3):237‐246.
Kusnoto B, Evans CA. Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122(4):342‐348.
Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(1):16‐e1.
Macchi A, Carrafiello G, Cacciafesta V, Norcini A. Three‐dimensional digital modeling and setup. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(5):605‐610.
Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A, Jacobson A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(3):300‐304.
Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(1):101‐105.
Sohmura T, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K, Takahashi J. Use of an ultrahigh‐speed laser scanner for constructing three‐dimensional shapes of dentition and occlusion. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(3):345‐352.
da Silva Filho OG, de Castro Machado FM, de Andrade AC, de Souza Freitas JA, Bishara SE. Upper dental arch morphology of adult unoperated complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114(2):154‐161.
Friede H, Pruzansky S. Longitudinal study of growth in bilateral cleft lip and palate, from infancy to adolescence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972;49(4):392‐403.
Robertson N, Shaw W, Volp C. The changes produced by presurgical orthopedic treatment of bilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59(1):87‐93.
Fernandes VM, Jorge PK, Carrara CF, Gomide MR, Machado MA, Oliveira TM. Three‐dimensional digital evaluation of dental arches in infants with cleft lip and/or palate. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(3):297‐302.
Mello BZ, Fernandes VM, Carrara CF, Machado MA, Garib DG, Oliveira TM. Evaluation of the intercanine distance in newborns with cleft lip and palate using 3D digital casts. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(5):437‐442.
Freitas JA, Garib DG, Oliveira M, et al. Rehabilitative treatment of cleft lip and palate: experience of the Hospital for Rehabilitation of craniofacial anomalies‐USP (HRAC‐USP)—part 2: pediatric dentistry and orthodontics. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(2):268‐281.
Prahl C, Kuijpers‐Jagtman AM, Van't Hof MA, Prahl‐Andersen B. A randomised prospective clinical trial into the effect of infant orthopaedics on maxillary arch dimensions in unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft). Eur J Oral Sci. 2001;109(5):297‐305.
Seckel NG, van der Tweel I, Elema GA, Specken TF. Landmark positioning on maxilla of cleft lip and palate infant—a reality? Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995;32(5):434‐441.
Carrara CF, Ambrosio EC, Mello BZ, et al. Three‐dimensional evaluation of surgical techniques in neonates with orofacial cleft. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016;6(2):246‐250.
Harila V, Ylikontiola LP, Palola R, Sandor GK. Maxillary arch dimensions in cleft infants in northern Finland. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(3–4):930‐936.
Lo LJ, Wong FH, Chen YR, Lin WY, Ko EW. Palatal surface area measurement: comparisons among different cleft types. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50(1):18‐24.
Ruiz‐Escolano MG, Martinez‐Plaza A, Fernandez‐Valades R, et al. Nasoalveolar molding therapy for the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate improves nasal symmetry and maxillary alveolar dimensions. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(8):1978‐1982.
Botticelli S, Pedersen TK, Kuseler A, Norholt SE, Cattaneo PM. Novel 3‐D analysis for the assessment of cleft dimensions on digital models of infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(1):127‐133.