High Demand for Psychological Support in Patients Who Have Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections: An Analysis of 13,976 Patients.

complications psychological support revision arthroplasty total hip arthroplasty total knee arthroplasty

Journal

The Journal of arthroplasty
ISSN: 1532-8406
Titre abrégé: J Arthroplasty
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8703515

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 24 04 2024
revised: 03 07 2024
accepted: 08 07 2024
medline: 15 7 2024
pubmed: 15 7 2024
entrez: 14 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

There is only sparse knowledge on the psychological burden of patients who have periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). The aim of our study was to assess the need for psychological support following total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee. A special focus was set on patients who had aseptic and septic complications. A total of 13,976 patients who underwent total hip (THA, n = 6,926) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA, n = 7,050) between January 1 The average age was 68 years (range, 12 to 100), and there were 63.5% women. The overall rate of psychological consultations was 1.7%. Patients who had a septic indication for revision surgery had an 18.7-fold higher rate of postoperative psychological consultations compared to patients following primary surgery and a 5.4-fold higher rate compared to patients who had an aseptic indication. In detail, this rate was 1.0% in the primary subgroup, compared to 7.7% following revision arthroplasty (P < 0.001). In the revision subgroup, the rate was 17.9% for septic and 3.3% for aseptic revision arthroplasty cases (P < 0.001). Postoperative psychological consultations were twice as frequent in women (2.1%) compared to men (1.0%), P < 0.001. The present study raises awareness of the markedly high psychological burden in revision arthroplasty cases, in the view of the high estimated number of unknown cases. There is a significant correlation between PJI and the postoperative need for a psychological consultation, with women being at an even higher risk. Health care providers should aim at offering psychological support for patients who have a septic complication, with affected patients being at risk for psychological stress.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
There is only sparse knowledge on the psychological burden of patients who have periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). The aim of our study was to assess the need for psychological support following total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee. A special focus was set on patients who had aseptic and septic complications.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 13,976 patients who underwent total hip (THA, n = 6,926) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA, n = 7,050) between January 1
RESULTS RESULTS
The average age was 68 years (range, 12 to 100), and there were 63.5% women. The overall rate of psychological consultations was 1.7%. Patients who had a septic indication for revision surgery had an 18.7-fold higher rate of postoperative psychological consultations compared to patients following primary surgery and a 5.4-fold higher rate compared to patients who had an aseptic indication. In detail, this rate was 1.0% in the primary subgroup, compared to 7.7% following revision arthroplasty (P < 0.001). In the revision subgroup, the rate was 17.9% for septic and 3.3% for aseptic revision arthroplasty cases (P < 0.001). Postoperative psychological consultations were twice as frequent in women (2.1%) compared to men (1.0%), P < 0.001.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The present study raises awareness of the markedly high psychological burden in revision arthroplasty cases, in the view of the high estimated number of unknown cases. There is a significant correlation between PJI and the postoperative need for a psychological consultation, with women being at an even higher risk. Health care providers should aim at offering psychological support for patients who have a septic complication, with affected patients being at risk for psychological stress.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39004387
pii: S0883-5403(24)00712-5
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

A Aichmair (A)

II. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Vienna, Austria; Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopaedic Research, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: alexander.aichmair@oss.at.

D Pastl (D)

Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopaedic Research, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Vienna, Austria.

B J H Frank (BJH)

II. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Vienna, Austria; Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopaedic Research, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Vienna, Austria.

S Simon (S)

II. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Vienna, Austria; Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopaedic Research, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Vienna, Austria.

J A Mitterer (JA)

II. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Vienna, Austria; Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopaedic Research, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Vienna, Austria.

M Dominkus (M)

II. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Vienna, Austria.

J G Hofstaetter (JG)

II. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Vienna, Austria; Michael Ogon Laboratory for Orthopaedic Research, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Vienna, Austria.

Classifications MeSH