Cognitive Behavioral Psychotherapy as an Add-on in Comprehensive Outpatient Care of Non-affective Psychoses: A Multicenter Randomized-Controlled Effectiveness Trial in a Naturalistic Setting.

RCT clinical trial schizophrenia treatment effects

Journal

Schizophrenia bulletin
ISSN: 1745-1701
Titre abrégé: Schizophr Bull
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0236760

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline: 15 7 2024
pubmed: 15 7 2024
entrez: 15 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Non-affective psychoses (NAP) are associated with severe consequences with regard to social functioning, physical health, employment, and suicidality. Treatment guidelines recommend cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp) as an effective additional treatment strategy to psychopharmacology. We hypothesized that outpatient CBTp has an add-on effect in individuals with NAP who already receive comprehensive outpatient care (COC) in Germany. In a randomized-controlled effectiveness trial, 6 months of COC + CBTp were compared to COC. The primary outcomes were change of symptom severity as assessed by the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (pre-/post-treatment and 6-month follow-up). Mixed linear models and effect sizes were used to compare changes across treatment groups. Additionally, the number of readmissions was compared. N = 130 individuals with chronic NAP were recruited (COC + CBTp: n = 64, COC: n = 66). COC + CBTp participants significantly improved more regarding positive symptom severity (estimated mean difference at follow-up: -2.33, 95% CI: -4.04 to -0.61, P = .0083, d = 0.32) and general psychopathology (estimated mean difference at follow-up: -4.55, 95% CI: -7.30 to -1.81, P = .0013, d = 0.44) than the COC group. In both groups, negative symptom severity did not change significantly over time nor did groups differ regarding readmissions. The results underline an add-on benefit of CBTp in chronically ill individuals with NAP. Superiority of CBTp was demonstrated in comparison with high-quality comprehensive care and may also be true in different comprehensive care settings. DRKS00015627.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS OBJECTIVE
Non-affective psychoses (NAP) are associated with severe consequences with regard to social functioning, physical health, employment, and suicidality. Treatment guidelines recommend cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp) as an effective additional treatment strategy to psychopharmacology. We hypothesized that outpatient CBTp has an add-on effect in individuals with NAP who already receive comprehensive outpatient care (COC) in Germany.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
In a randomized-controlled effectiveness trial, 6 months of COC + CBTp were compared to COC. The primary outcomes were change of symptom severity as assessed by the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (pre-/post-treatment and 6-month follow-up). Mixed linear models and effect sizes were used to compare changes across treatment groups. Additionally, the number of readmissions was compared.
STUDY RESULTS RESULTS
N = 130 individuals with chronic NAP were recruited (COC + CBTp: n = 64, COC: n = 66). COC + CBTp participants significantly improved more regarding positive symptom severity (estimated mean difference at follow-up: -2.33, 95% CI: -4.04 to -0.61, P = .0083, d = 0.32) and general psychopathology (estimated mean difference at follow-up: -4.55, 95% CI: -7.30 to -1.81, P = .0013, d = 0.44) than the COC group. In both groups, negative symptom severity did not change significantly over time nor did groups differ regarding readmissions.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The results underline an add-on benefit of CBTp in chronically ill individuals with NAP. Superiority of CBTp was demonstrated in comparison with high-quality comprehensive care and may also be true in different comprehensive care settings.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
DRKS00015627.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39004927
pii: 7713620
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae080
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Akademie Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Ostwestfalen-Lippe

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Carolin Steuwe (C)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ev. Klinikum Bethel, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.

Silvia Carvalho Fernando (S)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ev. Klinikum Bethel, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.

Ingo Runte (I)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ev. Klinikum Bethel, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.

Stefan Bender (S)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LWL-Klinikum Marsberg, Marsberg, Germany.

Wolfgang Heiler (W)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LWL-Klinikum Marsberg, Marsberg, Germany.

Fabian Klein (F)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LWL-Klinikum Gütersloh, Gütersloh, Germany.

Klaus Kronmüller (K)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LWL-Klinikum Gütersloh, Gütersloh, Germany.

Kathrin Volmert (K)

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, LWL-Klinik Paderborn, Germany.

Christine Norra (C)

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, LWL-Klinik Paderborn, Germany.
Medical Faculty, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Stefan Engelbrecht (S)

Ausbildungszentrum OWL gGmbH, Bielefeld, Germany.

Martin Driessen (M)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ev. Klinikum Bethel, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.

Classifications MeSH