Testing the evolutionary drivers of malaria parasite rhythms and their consequences for host-parasite interactions.
Plasmodium
circadian rhythm
fitness
fitness proxies
intra‐erythrocytic development cycle
transmission
virulence
Journal
Evolutionary applications
ISSN: 1752-4571
Titre abrégé: Evol Appl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101461828
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
14
08
2023
revised:
05
06
2024
accepted:
25
06
2024
medline:
15
7
2024
pubmed:
15
7
2024
entrez:
15
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Undertaking certain activities at the time of day that maximises fitness is assumed to explain the evolution of circadian clocks. Organisms often use daily environmental cues such as light and food availability to set the timing of their clocks. These cues may be the environmental rhythms that ultimately determine fitness, act as proxies for the timing of less tractable ultimate drivers, or are used simply to maintain internal synchrony. While many pathogens/parasites undertake rhythmic activities, both the proximate and ultimate drivers of their rhythms are poorly understood. Explaining the roles of rhythms in infections offers avenues for novel interventions to interfere with parasite fitness and reduce the severity and spread of disease. Here, we perturb several rhythms in the hosts of malaria parasites to investigate why parasites align their rhythmic replication to the host's feeding-fasting rhythm. We manipulated host rhythms governed by light, food or both, and assessed the fitness implications for parasites, and the consequences for hosts, to test which host rhythms represent ultimate drivers of the parasite's rhythm. We found that alignment with the host's light-driven rhythms did not affect parasite fitness metrics. In contrast, aligning with the timing of feeding-fasting rhythms may be beneficial for the parasite, but only when the host possess a functional canonical circadian clock. Because parasites in clock-disrupted hosts align with the host's feeding-fasting rhythms and yet derive no apparent benefit, our results suggest cue(s) from host food act as a proxy rather than being a key selective driver of the parasite's rhythm. Alternatively, parasite rhythmicity may only be beneficial because it promotes synchrony between parasite cells and/or allows parasites to align to the biting rhythms of vectors. Our results also suggest that interventions can disrupt parasite rhythms by targeting the proxies or the selective factors driving them without impacting host health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39006006
doi: 10.1111/eva.13752
pii: EVA13752
pmc: PMC11246599
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e13752Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. All procedures were carried out in accordance with the UK Home Office regulations (Animals Scientific Procedures Act 1986; SI 2012/3039) and approved by the ethical review panel at the University of Edinburgh.