Consensus and contention in beauty judgment.

Social interaction Social sciences

Journal

iScience
ISSN: 2589-0042
Titre abrégé: iScience
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101724038

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 11 05 2023
revised: 28 05 2024
accepted: 05 06 2024
medline: 15 7 2024
pubmed: 15 7 2024
entrez: 15 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Variance across participants is at the heart of the centuries-old debate about the universality of beauty. Beauty's belonging to the eye of the beholder implies large interindividual variance, while beauty as a universal object property implies the opposite. To characterize the variance at the center of this debate, we selected two quartets with either high- or low-variance images with high typicality and a given mean beauty. The quartets have high or low variance across 50 participants (

Identifiants

pubmed: 39006484
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110213
pii: S2589-0042(24)01438-X
pmc: PMC11245996
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

110213

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Maria Pombo (M)

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Aleksandra Igdalova (A)

Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK.

Denis G Pelli (DG)

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Classifications MeSH