The Social Value Misconception in Clinical Research.

Social value altruism autonomy clinical research misconception participant decision-making study enrollment

Journal

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB
ISSN: 1536-0075
Titre abrégé: Am J Bioeth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100898738

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline: 15 7 2024
pubmed: 15 7 2024
entrez: 15 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Clinical researchers should help respect the autonomy and promote the well-being of prospective study participants by helping them make voluntary, informed decisions about enrollment. However, participants often exhibit poor understanding of important information about clinical research. Bioethicists have given special attention to "misconceptions" about clinical research that can compromise participants' decision-making, most notably the "therapeutic misconception." These misconceptions typically involve false beliefs about a study's purpose, or risks or potential benefits for participants. In this article, we describe a misconception involving false beliefs about a study's potential benefits for non-participants, or its expected social value. This social value misconception can compromise altruistically motivated participants' decision-making, potentially threatening their autonomy and well-being. We show how the social value misconception raises ethical concerns for inherently low-value research, hyped research, and even ordinary research, and advocate for empirical and normative work to help understand and counteract this misconception's potential negative impacts on participants.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39007856
doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2371119
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-17

Auteurs

Jake Earl (J)

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.

Liza Dawson (L)

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.

Annette Rid (A)

National Institutes of Health.

Classifications MeSH