Higher rates of intraoperative fractures with compaction broaching compared to conventional broaching during hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.
Broaching
Hip hemiarthroplasty
Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jul 2024
15 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
14
02
2024
accepted:
11
06
2024
medline:
15
7
2024
pubmed:
15
7
2024
entrez:
15
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (IPFF) is a known iatrogenic complication during hemiarthroplasty (HA) which may lead to inferior outcomes. The risk factors for IPFF during HA in displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) remains to be fully elucidated. This study aims to compare IPFF rates between compaction broaching and conventional broaching techniques for cementless HA in FNF. We retrospectively reviewed institutional surgical data of patients who underwent cementless HA for displaced FNF from January 2010 to January 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the broaching system: conventional broaching and compaction broaching. The presence, location, and treatment of IPFF were assessed for both groups. Effect of IPFF on postoperative weight-bearing status, mortality readmission and revision rates were compared between groups. A total of 1,586 patients included in the study. 1252 patients (78.9%) in the conventional broaching group and 334 patients (21.1%) in the compaction broaching group. A total of 104 IPFF were found (6.5%). As compared to conventional broaching, compaction broaching was associated with significant higher IPFF rates (12.9% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001, OR 2.84, CI 1.88-4.30). The location of the IPFF was similar between groups (p = 0.366), as well as the intraoperative treatment (p = 0.103) and postoperative weight-bearing status (p = 0.640). Surgical time, mortality rates, readmission rates and revision rates were comparable between groups. In a multivariate regression analysis, compaction broaching (OR, 4.24; p < 0.001) was independently associated with IPFF. This study reveals higher rates of IPFF associated with compaction broaching. Although this finding may have minimal clinical relevance, surgeons should consider these results when considering implant selection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39008071
doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05402-6
pii: 10.1007/s00402-024-05402-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Sathiyakumar V, Greenberg SE, Molina CS et al (2015) Hip fractures are risky business: an analysis of the NSQIP data. Injury 46:703–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.051
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.051
pubmed: 25457339
Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P et al (2005) Operative management of displaced femoral Neck fractures in Elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg 87:2122–2130. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00535
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00535
pubmed: 16140828
Handoll HH, Parker MJ (2008) Conservative versus operative treatment for hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000337.pub2
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000337.pub2
E T (2016) Hip fractures in the elderly: operative versus nonoperative management. Singap Med J 57:178–181. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2016071
Young PS, Patil S, Meek RMD (2018) Intraoperative femoral fractures. Bone Joint Res 7:103–104. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0318.R1
doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0318.R1
pubmed: 29363520
pmcid: 5805832
Mayle RE, Della Valle CJ (2012) Intra-operative fractures during THA. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94–B:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.30614
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.30614
Abdel MP, Watts CD, Houdek MT et al (2016) Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties. Bone Joint J 98–B:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.37201
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.37201
pubmed: 27037427
Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Johnsen SøP, Søballe K (2008) Inferior outcome after intraoperative femoral fracture in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 79:327–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710015210
doi: 10.1080/17453670710015210
pubmed: 18622835
Lindberg-Larsen M, Jørgensen CC, Solgaard S et al (2017) Increased risk of intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture with uncemented stems. Acta Orthop 88:390–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1302908
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1302908
pubmed: 28290738
pmcid: 5499329
Brüggemann H, Dalen I, Bache-Mathiesen LK et al (2022) Incidence and risk factors of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures during primary total hip arthroplasty: 218,423 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 1987 and 2020. Acta Orthop 93. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.2431
Moroni A, Faldini C, Piras F, Giannini S (2000) Risk factors for intraoperative femoral fractures during total hip replacement. Ann Chir Gynaecol 89:113–118
pubmed: 10905677
Sidler-Maier CC, Waddell JP (2015) Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review. Int Orthop 39:1673–1682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2721-y
doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2721-y
pubmed: 25813458
Sullivan KJ, Husak LE, Altebarmakian M, Brox WT (2016) Demographic factors in hip fracture incidence and mortality rates in California, 2000–2011. J Orthop Surg Res 11:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0332-3
doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0332-3
pubmed: 26746904
pmcid: 4705624
Hong CC, Nashi N, Tan JH et al (2018) Intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture during bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138:1189–1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2952-7
doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2952-7
pubmed: 29770880
Ashkenazi I, Amzallag N, Factor S et al (2024) Age as a risk factor for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in Cementless Hip Hemiarthroplasty for femoral Neck fractures: a retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop Surg 16:41–48. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios23157
doi: 10.4055/cios23157
pubmed: 38304210
Rogmark C, Leonardsson O (2016) Hip arthroplasty for the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients. Bone Joint J 98–B:291–297. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B3.36515
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B3.36515
pubmed: 26920951
Konow T, Baetz J, Melsheimer O et al (2021) Factors influencing periprosthetic femoral fracture risk. Bone Joint J 103–B:650–658. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1046.R2
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1046.R2
pubmed: 33789487
Carli AV, Negus JJ, Haddad FS (2017) Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them. Bone Joint J 99–B:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0220.R1
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0220.R1
pubmed: 28042119
Mazzawi E, Ghrayeb N, Khury F et al (2022) A comparison between Austin-Moore and Corail prosthesis regarding intraoperative periprosthetic femur fractures in hip hemiarthroplasty. Sci Rep 12:6340. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10384-9
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10384-9
pubmed: 35428861
pmcid: 9012879
Hjorth MH, Stilling M, Søballe K et al (2016) Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction. Acta Orthop 87:575–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1244958
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1244958
pubmed: 27759486
pmcid: 5119439
Okowinski M, Hjorth MH, Mosegaard SB et al (2021) Ten-year comparison of two different techniques for femoral bone cavity preparation—broaching versus compaction in patients with cementless total hip arthroplasty. Bone Jt Open 2:1035–1042. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.212.BJO-2021-0152.R1
doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.212.BJO-2021-0152.R1
pubmed: 34865512
pmcid: 8711659
Vidalain J-P (2011) Twenty-year results of the cementless Corail stem. Int Orthop 35:189–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1117-2
doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1117-2
pubmed: 20814676
Drobniewski M, Borowski A, Synder M, Sibiński M (2013) Results of total cementless hip joint arthroplasty with Corail stem. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 15:1–10. https://doi.org/10.5604/15093492.1032797
doi: 10.5604/15093492.1032797
Laflamme M, Angers M, Vachon J et al (2020) High incidence of intraoperative fractures with a specific cemented stem following Intracapsular Displaced hip fracture. J Arthroplasty 35:485–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.017
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.017
pubmed: 31594703
Imam MA, Shehata MSA, Elsehili A et al (2019) Contemporary cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures: a meta-analysis of forty-two thousand forty-six hips. Int Orthop 43:1715–1723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04325-x
doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04325-x
pubmed: 30919045
Fu M, Shen J, Ren Z et al (2023) A systematic review and meta-analysis of cemented and uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients over 60 years old. Front Med (Lausanne) 10:1085485. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1085485
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1085485
pubmed: 36817792
Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Delgado-Martinez AD (2022) Risk factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Clin Med 11:6128. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206128
doi: 10.3390/jcm11206128
pubmed: 36294449
pmcid: 9605414
Zhu Y, Zhang F, Chen W et al (2015) Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect 89:82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2014.10.008
doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.10.008
pubmed: 25575769
Davidson D, Pike J, Garbuz D et al (2008) Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2000–2012. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00331
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00331
pubmed: 18762663