Timing of Off-Label Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Three Large Health Systems.
Journal
Thrombosis and haemostasis
ISSN: 2567-689X
Titre abrégé: Thromb Haemost
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7608063
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jul 2024
15 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline:
16
7
2024
pubmed:
16
7
2024
entrez:
15
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be viewed as simpler to manage then warfarin, they present their own unique management challenges resulting in frequent off-label dosing. It is unknown to what extent off-label dosing occurs when a patient is started on a DOAC versus later in their treatment. We aimed to characterize when off-label DOAC dosing is occurring and to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention. We evaluated data from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) registry, a retrospective quality improvement process using data abstractors, from 2018 - 2022 on the number of "alerts" that are generated in response to dosing deviating from evidence-based guidelines. Among a sample of 1,261 to 1,563 annual DOAC-treated patients in the MAQI2 registry, off-label dosing was relatively common. Over the 5-year period from 2018 through 2022, there were 735 total dosing alerts. Alerts occurred more frequently during a follow-up than at the time of initial prescribing, 69.0% (507) versus 31.0% (228) respectively. After initial review by quality improvement abstractors, 18.2% of alerts (134) resulted in contact to the prescriber. When the prescriber was contacted, it led to an intervention 74.6% of the time. The most common intervention was a change in DOAC dosing. This study demonstrates the benefit of DOAC prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention to monitor for off-label dosing for the entirety of the time period a patient is prescribed DOAC as deviations in evidence-based prescribing occur frequently during the follow-up period.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be viewed as simpler to manage then warfarin, they present their own unique management challenges resulting in frequent off-label dosing. It is unknown to what extent off-label dosing occurs when a patient is started on a DOAC versus later in their treatment.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to characterize when off-label DOAC dosing is occurring and to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention.
METHODS
METHODS
We evaluated data from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) registry, a retrospective quality improvement process using data abstractors, from 2018 - 2022 on the number of "alerts" that are generated in response to dosing deviating from evidence-based guidelines.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among a sample of 1,261 to 1,563 annual DOAC-treated patients in the MAQI2 registry, off-label dosing was relatively common. Over the 5-year period from 2018 through 2022, there were 735 total dosing alerts. Alerts occurred more frequently during a follow-up than at the time of initial prescribing, 69.0% (507) versus 31.0% (228) respectively. After initial review by quality improvement abstractors, 18.2% of alerts (134) resulted in contact to the prescriber. When the prescriber was contacted, it led to an intervention 74.6% of the time. The most common intervention was a change in DOAC dosing.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates the benefit of DOAC prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention to monitor for off-label dosing for the entirety of the time period a patient is prescribed DOAC as deviations in evidence-based prescribing occur frequently during the follow-up period.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
ID : R18HS026874
Informations de copyright
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Geoffrey D. Barnes = Grant Funding - Boston Scientific; Consulting - Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Anthos, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific; DSMB - Translational Sciences (Clinical Events Adjudication Committee); Board of Directors - Anticoagulation Forum Scott Kaatz = Consulting- AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Gilead, Inari, Janssen, Pfizer, Phase Bio and Antos; Grant funding- Osmosis Research, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer and NIH; Board of Directors- Anticoagulation Forum, the PERT Consortium; Scientific Advisory Board for the National Blood Clot Alliance.