Timing of Off-Label Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Three Large Health Systems.


Journal

Thrombosis and haemostasis
ISSN: 2567-689X
Titre abrégé: Thromb Haemost
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7608063

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline: 16 7 2024
pubmed: 16 7 2024
entrez: 15 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be viewed as simpler to manage then warfarin, they present their own unique management challenges resulting in frequent off-label dosing. It is unknown to what extent off-label dosing occurs when a patient is started on a DOAC versus later in their treatment. We aimed to characterize when off-label DOAC dosing is occurring and to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention. We evaluated data from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) registry, a retrospective quality improvement process using data abstractors, from 2018 - 2022 on the number of "alerts" that are generated in response to dosing deviating from evidence-based guidelines. Among a sample of 1,261 to 1,563 annual DOAC-treated patients in the MAQI2 registry, off-label dosing was relatively common. Over the 5-year period from 2018 through 2022, there were 735 total dosing alerts. Alerts occurred more frequently during a follow-up than at the time of initial prescribing, 69.0% (507) versus 31.0% (228) respectively. After initial review by quality improvement abstractors, 18.2% of alerts (134) resulted in contact to the prescriber. When the prescriber was contacted, it led to an intervention 74.6% of the time. The most common intervention was a change in DOAC dosing. This study demonstrates the benefit of DOAC prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention to monitor for off-label dosing for the entirety of the time period a patient is prescribed DOAC as deviations in evidence-based prescribing occur frequently during the follow-up period.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be viewed as simpler to manage then warfarin, they present their own unique management challenges resulting in frequent off-label dosing. It is unknown to what extent off-label dosing occurs when a patient is started on a DOAC versus later in their treatment.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
We aimed to characterize when off-label DOAC dosing is occurring and to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention.
METHODS METHODS
We evaluated data from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) registry, a retrospective quality improvement process using data abstractors, from 2018 - 2022 on the number of "alerts" that are generated in response to dosing deviating from evidence-based guidelines.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among a sample of 1,261 to 1,563 annual DOAC-treated patients in the MAQI2 registry, off-label dosing was relatively common. Over the 5-year period from 2018 through 2022, there were 735 total dosing alerts. Alerts occurred more frequently during a follow-up than at the time of initial prescribing, 69.0% (507) versus 31.0% (228) respectively. After initial review by quality improvement abstractors, 18.2% of alerts (134) resulted in contact to the prescriber. When the prescriber was contacted, it led to an intervention 74.6% of the time. The most common intervention was a change in DOAC dosing.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates the benefit of DOAC prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention to monitor for off-label dosing for the entirety of the time period a patient is prescribed DOAC as deviations in evidence-based prescribing occur frequently during the follow-up period.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39009007
doi: 10.1055/a-2365-8681
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
ID : R18HS026874

Informations de copyright

Thieme. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Geoffrey D. Barnes = Grant Funding - Boston Scientific; Consulting - Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Anthos, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific; DSMB - Translational Sciences (Clinical Events Adjudication Committee); Board of Directors - Anticoagulation Forum Scott Kaatz = Consulting- AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Gilead, Inari, Janssen, Pfizer, Phase Bio and Antos; Grant funding- Osmosis Research, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer and NIH; Board of Directors- Anticoagulation Forum, the PERT Consortium; Scientific Advisory Board for the National Blood Clot Alliance.

Auteurs

Grace C Herron (GC)

University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, United States.

Deborah DeCamillo (D)

University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, United States.

Xiaowen Kong (X)

University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, United States.

Brian Haymart (B)

University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, United States.

Scott Kaatz (S)

Hospital Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States.

Stacy Ellsworth (S)

Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States.

Mona Ali (M)

Corewell Health Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, United States.

Christopher Giuliano (C)

Ascension St John Hospital, Detroit, United States.

James B Froehlich (JB)

University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, United States.

Geoffrey Barnes (G)

Frankel Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, United States.

Classifications MeSH