Pharmacological inhibition of CDK4/6 impairs diffuse pleural mesothelioma 3D spheroid growth and reduces viability of cisplatin-resistant cells.

apoptosis cell cycle cisplatin cyclin-dependent kinases inhibitors (CDKi) diffuse pleural mesothelioma (DPM) precision medicine synergism

Journal

Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 17 04 2024
accepted: 11 06 2024
medline: 16 7 2024
pubmed: 16 7 2024
entrez: 16 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Diffuse pleural mesothelioma (DPM) of the pleura is a highly aggressive and treatment-resistant cancer linked to asbestos exposure. Despite multimodal treatment, the prognosis for DPM patients remains very poor, with an average survival of 2 years from diagnosis. Cisplatin, a platinum-based chemotherapy drug, is commonly used in the treatment of DPM. However, the development of resistance to cisplatin significantly limits its effectiveness, highlighting the urgent need for alternative therapeutic strategies. New selective inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) have shown promise in various malignancies by inhibiting cell cycle progression and suppressing tumor growth. Recent studies have indicated the potential of abemaciclib for DPM therapy, and a phase II clinical trial has shown preliminary encouraging results. Here, we tested abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib on a panel of DPM cell lines and non-tumor mesothelial(MET-5A) cells. Specifically, we focused on abemaciclib, which was the mosteffective cytotoxic agent on all the DPM cell lines tested. Abemaciclib reduced DPM cell viability, clonogenic potential, and ability to grow as three-dimensional (3D) spheroids. In addition, abemaciclib induced prolonged effects, thereby impairing second-generation sphere formation and inducing G0/G1 arrest and apoptosis/ necrosis. Interestingly, single silencing of RB family members did not impair cell response to abemaciclib, suggesting that they likely complement each other in triggering abemaciclib's cytostatic effect. Interestingly, abemaciclib reduced the phosphorylation of AKT, which is hyperactive in DPM and synergized with the pharmacological AKT inhibitor (AKTi VIII). Abemaciclib also synergized with cisplatin and reduced the viability of DPM cells with acquired resistance to cisplatin. Overall, our results suggest that CDK4/6 inhibitors alone or in combination with standard of care should be further explored for DPM therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39011477
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1418951
pmc: PMC11246887
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1418951

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Costa, Forte, Pentimalli, Iannuzzi, Alfano, Capone, Camerlingo, Calabrese, von Arx, Benot Dominguez, Quintiliani, De Laurentiis, Morrione and Giordano.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Auteurs

Aurora Costa (A)

Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Iris Maria Forte (IM)

Experimental ClinicalOncology of Breast Unit, Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.

Francesca Pentimalli (F)

Department of Medicine and Surgery, LUM University "Giuseppe De Gennaro", Bari, Italy.

Carmelina Antonella Iannuzzi (CA)

Experimental ClinicalOncology of Breast Unit, Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.

Luigi Alfano (L)

Experimental ClinicalOncology of Breast Unit, Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.

Francesca Capone (F)

Experimental Pharmacology Unit-Laboratories of Naples andMercogliano (AV), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.

Rosa Camerlingo (R)

Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.

Alessandra Calabrese (A)

Experimental ClinicalOncology of Breast Unit, Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.

Claudia von Arx (C)

Experimental ClinicalOncology of Breast Unit, Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.

Reyes Benot Dominguez (R)

Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Massimiliano Quintiliani (M)

SHRO Italia ETS, Candiolo, Italy.

Michelino De Laurentiis (M)

Experimental ClinicalOncology of Breast Unit, Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.

Andrea Morrione (A)

Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Antonio Giordano (A)

Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Classifications MeSH