Marginal integrity of prototype bioactive glass-doped resin composites in class II cavities.
Composite Resins
/ chemistry
In Vitro Techniques
Glass
/ chemistry
Materials Testing
Dental Restoration, Permanent
/ methods
Dental Marginal Adaptation
Saliva, Artificial
/ chemistry
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Surface Properties
Humans
Dental Cavity Preparation
Ceramics
/ chemistry
Resin Cements
/ chemistry
Fluorides
/ chemistry
Bioactive glass
Experimental resin composite
Marginal adaptation
Marginal gap
Thermocycling
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jul 2024
16 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
07
06
2024
accepted:
08
07
2024
medline:
16
7
2024
pubmed:
16
7
2024
entrez:
16
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This in vitro study examined the marginal integrity of experimental composite materials doped with bioactive glass (BG). Class-II MOD cavities were prepared and restored with one of the following composite materials: a commercial composite material as a reference (Filtek Supreme XTE), an experimental composite doped with BG 45S5 (C-20), and an experimental composite doped with a fluoride-containing BG (F-20). Six experimental groups (n = 8) were used, as each of the three composites was applied with (+) or without (-) a universal adhesive (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose). All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 x, 5-55 °C) and then additionally stored in artificial saliva for eight weeks. Scanning electron micrographs of the mesial and the distal box were taken at three time points (initial, after thermocycling, and after eight weeks of storage in artificial saliva). The margins were classified as "continuous" and "non-continuous" and the percentage of continuous margins (PCM) was statistically analyzed (α = 0.05). In most experimental groups, thermocycling led to a significant decrease in PCM, while the additional 8-week aging had no significant effect. F-20 + performed significantly better (p = 0.005) after 8 weeks storage in artificial saliva than the reference material with adhesive, while no statistically significant differences were observed at the other two time points. C-20 + exhibited significantly better PCM than the reference material with adhesive after thermocycling (p = 0.026) and after 8 weeks (p = 0.003). Overall, the experimental composites with BG showed at least as good marginal adaptation as the commercial reference, with an indication of possible re-sealing of marginal gaps. Maintaining or improving the marginal integrity of composite restorations is important to prevent microleakage and its likely consequences such as pulp irritation and secondary caries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39012388
doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05824-x
pii: 10.1007/s00784-024-05824-x
doi:
Substances chimiques
Composite Resins
0
Saliva, Artificial
0
Filtek Supreme
0
bioactive glass 45S5
0
Scotchbond Multi-Purpose
0
Resin Cements
0
Fluorides
Q80VPU408O
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
430Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Palotie U, Vehkalahti MM (2012) Reasons for replacement of restorations: dentists’ perceptions. Acta Odontol Scand 70:485–490. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2011.640274
doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.640274
pubmed: 22214435
Nedeljkovic I, De Munck J, Vanloy A, Declerck D, Lambrechts P, Peumans M, Teughels W, Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL (2020) Secondary caries: prevalence, characteristics, and approach. Clin Oral Investig 24:683–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02894-0
doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02894-0
pubmed: 31123872
Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Rodolfo B, Collares K, Correa MB, Demarco FF, Opdam NJM, Cenci MS, Moraes RR (2022) Clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations after up to 33 years. Dent Mater 38:680–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.02.009
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.02.009
pubmed: 35221128
Nedeljkovic I, Teughels W, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL (2015) Is secondary caries with composites a material-based problem? Dent Mater 31:e247–e277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.001
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.001
pubmed: 26410151
Seemann R, Flury S, Pfefferkorn F, Lussi A, Noack MJ (2014) Restorative dentistry and restorative materials over the next 20 years: a Delphi survey. Dent Mater 30:442–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.013
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.013
pubmed: 24522149
Vallittu PK, Boccaccini AR, Hupa L, Watts DC (2018) Bioactive dental materials-Do they exist and what does bioactivity mean? Dent Mater 34:693–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.001
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.001
pubmed: 29571660
Wu Q, Mei ML, Wu X, Shi S, Xu Y, Chu CH, Chen Y (2020) Remineralising effect of 45S5 bioactive glass on artificial caries in dentine. BMC Oral Health 20:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1038-4
doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-1038-4
pubmed: 32046691
pmcid: 7014937
Taha AA, Patel MP, Hill RG, Fleming PS (2017) The effect of bioactive glasses on enamel remineralization: a systematic review. J Dent 67:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.007
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.007
pubmed: 28939485
Davis HB, Gwinner F, Mitchell JC, Ferracane JL (2014) Ion release from, and fluoride recharge of a composite with a fluoride-containing bioactive glass. Dent Mater 30:1187–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.012
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.012
pubmed: 25175342
pmcid: 4228797
Al-Eesa NA, Wong FSL, Johal A, Hill RG (2017) Fluoride containing bioactive glass composite for orthodontic adhesives - ion release properties. Dent Mater 33:1324–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.08.185
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.08.185
pubmed: 29029848
Chatzistavrou X, Velamakanni S, DiRenzo K, Lefkelidou A, Fenno JC, Kasuga T, Boccaccini AR, Papagerakis P (2015) Designing dental composites with bioactive and bactericidal properties. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 52:267–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.03.062
doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.03.062
pubmed: 25953567
Nedeljkovic I, De Munck J, Slomka V, Van Meerbeek B, Teughels W, Van Landuyt KL (2016) Lack of buffering by composites promotes shift to more cariogenic bacteria. J Dent Res 95:875–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516647677
doi: 10.1177/0022034516647677
pubmed: 27146702
Hench LL (2006) The story of Bioglass. J Mater Sci Mater Med 17:967–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z
doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z
pubmed: 17122907
Jones JR (2013) Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 9:4457–4486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023
pubmed: 22922331
Par M, Spanovic N, Tauböck TT, Attin T, Tarle Z (2019) Degree of conversion of experimental resin composites containing bioactive glass 45S5: the effect of post-cure heating. Sci Rep 9:17245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54035-y
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54035-y
pubmed: 31754180
pmcid: 6872577
Par M, Spanovic N, Bjelovucic R, Skenderovic H, Gamulin O, Tarle Z (2018) Curing potential of experimental resin composites with systematically varying amount of bioactive glass: degree of conversion, light transmittance and depth of cure. J Dent 75:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.004
pubmed: 29908899
Muradbegovic A, Par M, Panduric V, Zugec P, Tauböck TT, Attin T, Tarle Z, Marovic D (2023) Water-induced changes in experimental resin composites functionalized with conventional (45S5) and customized bioactive glass. J Funct Biomater 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14060298
Par M, Plančak L, Ratkovski L, Tauböck TT, Marovic D, Attin T, Tarle Z (2022) Improved flexural properties of experimental resin composites functionalized with a customized low-sodium bioactive glass. Polymers 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14204289
Par M, Gubler A, Attin T, Tarle Z, Tarle A, Tauböck TT (2022) Ion release and hydroxyapatite precipitation of resin composites functionalized with two types of bioactive glass. J Dent 118:103950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.103950
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.103950
pubmed: 35026355
Al-Eesa NA, Johal A, Hill RG, Wong FSL (2018) Fluoride containing bioactive glass composite for orthodontic adhesives - apatite formation properties. Dent Mater 34:1127–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.04.009
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.04.009
pubmed: 29779628
Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ (1997) Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00063-2 . 25:435 – 40
doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00063-2
pubmed: 9604575
Tauböck TT, Bortolotto T, Buchalla W, Attin T, Krejci I (2010) Influence of light-curing protocols on polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage force of a dual-cured core build-up resin composite. Eur J Oral Sci 118:423–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00746.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00746.x
pubmed: 20662918
Kwon Y, Ferracane J, Lee IB (2012) Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dent Mater 28:801–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.028
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.028
pubmed: 22575738
Savadi Oskoee S, Bahari M, Jafari Navimipour E, Ajami AA, Ghiasvand N, Savadi Oskoee A (2017) Factors affecting marginal integrity of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 11:101–109. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2017.019
doi: 10.15171/joddd.2017.019
pubmed: 28748051
pmcid: 5519990
Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2004) Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.008 . 32:109 – 15
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.008
pubmed: 14749082
Fabianelli A, Goracci C, Ferrari M (2003) Sealing ability of packable resin composites in class II restorations. J Adhes Dent 5:217–223
pubmed: 14621243
Yantcheva SM (2021) Marginal adaptation and micropermeability of class II cavities restored with three different types of resin composites - a comparative ten-month in vitro study. Polymers 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101660
Soares CJ, Faria-E-Silva AL, Rodrigues MP, Vilela ABF, Pfeifer CS, Tantbirojn D and Versluis A (2017) Polymerization shrinkage stress of composite resins and resin cements- What do we need to know? Braz Oral Res 31:e62. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0062
Jokstad A (2016) Secondary caries and microleakage. Dent Mater 32:11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.006
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.006
pubmed: 26423008
Oltramare R, Par M, Mohn D, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT (2021) Short- and long-term dentin bond strength of bioactive glass-modified dental adhesives. Nanomaterials 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11081894
Khvostenko D, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Mitchell JC, Kruzic JJ (2016) Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations. Dent Mater 32:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.007
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.007
pubmed: 26621028
Klimek J, Hellwig E, Ahrens G (1982) Fluoride taken up by plaque, by the underlying enamel and by clean enamel from three fluoride compounds in vitro. Caries Res 16:156–161. https://doi.org/10.1159/000260592
doi: 10.1159/000260592
pubmed: 6951638
Scepanovic D, Par M, Attin T, Tauböck TT (2022) Marginal adaptation of flowable vs sonically activated or preheated resin composites in cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 24:247–257. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b3032461
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b3032461
pubmed: 35575657
Paganini A, Attin T, Tauböck TT (2020) Margin integrity of bulk-fill composite restorations in primary teeth. Materials 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173802
Tauböck TT, Zehnder M, Schweizer T, Stark WJ, Attin T, Mohn D (2014) Functionalizing a dentin bonding resin to become bioactive. Dent Mater 30:868–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.029
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.029
pubmed: 24946984
Odermatt R, Par M, Mohn D, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT (2020) Bioactivity and physico-chemical properties of dental composites functionalized with nano- vs. micro-sized bioactive glass. J Clin Med 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030772
Jäger F, Mohn D, Attin T, Tauböck TT (2021) Polymerization and shrinkage stress formation of experimental resin composites doped with nano- vs. micron-sized bioactive glasses. Dent Mater J 40:110–115. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-382
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-382
pubmed: 32863377
De Caluwé T, Vercruysse CW, Declercq HA, Schaubroeck D, Verbeeck RM, Martens LC (2016) Bioactivity and biocompatibility of two fluoride containing bioactive glasses for dental applications. Dent Mater 32:1414–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.014
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.014
pubmed: 27686260
Par M, Attin T, Tarle Z, Tauböck TT (2020) A new customized bioactive glass filler to functionalize resin composites: acid-neutralizing capability, degree of conversion, and apatite precipitation. J Clin Med 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041173
Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U (2014) Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 42:800–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012
pubmed: 24814138
Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess JO (2015) Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 43:1229–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009
pubmed: 26231300
pmcid: 4871604
Sangwichit K, Kingkaew R, Pongprueksa P, Senawongse P (2016) Effect of thermocycling on the durability of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives on dentin. Dent Mater J 35:360–368. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-253
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-253
pubmed: 27251990
Dietschi D, Herzfeld D (1998) In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 106:1033–1042. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106609.x
doi: 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106609.x
pubmed: 9879916
Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M (2008) Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? J Adhes Dent 10:339–344
pubmed: 19058678
Brauer DS, Karpukhina N, O’Donnell MD, Law RV, Hill RG (2010) Fluoride-containing bioactive glasses: effect of glass design and structure on degradation, pH and apatite formation in simulated body fluid. Acta Biomater 6:3275–3282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.043
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.043
pubmed: 20132911
Chen X, Brauer DS, Wilson RM, Hill RG, Karpukhina N (2014) Bioactivity of sodium free fluoride containing glasses and glass-ceramics. Materials 7:5470–5487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7085470
doi: 10.3390/ma7085470
pubmed: 28788139
pmcid: 5456181
Kanwal N, Brauer DS, Earl J, Wilson RM, Karpukhina N, Hill RG (2018) In-vitro apatite formation capacity of a bioactive glass - containing toothpaste. J Dent 68:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.015
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.015
pubmed: 29097120
Fernando D, Attik N, Pradelle-Plasse N, Jackson P, Grosgogeat B, Colon P (2017) Bioactive glass for dentin remineralization: a systematic review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 76:1369–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.083
doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.083
pubmed: 28482504
Par M, Gubler A, Attin T, Tarle Z, Tarle A, Tauböck TT (2021) Experimental bioactive glass-containing composites and commercial restorative materials: anti-demineralizing protection of dentin. Biomedicines 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111616
Par M, Gubler A, Attin T, Tarle Z, Tauböck TT (2021) Anti-demineralizing protective effects on enamel identified in experimental and commercial restorative materials with functional fillers. Sci Rep 11:11806. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91279-z
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91279-z
pubmed: 34083707
pmcid: 8175467
Okuyama K, Nakata T, Pereira PN, Kawamoto C, Komatsu H, Sano H (2006) Prevention of artificial caries: effect of bonding agent, resin composite and topical fluoride application. Oper Dent. https://doi.org/10.2341/0361-7734 (2006)31[135:POACEO]2.0.CO;2 31:135 – 42
doi: 10.2341/0361-7734
pubmed: 16536205