[Urinary diversion in old patients (80+ years)].
Harnableitung beim alten Patienten (80+).
Cystectomy
Geriatric patient
Ileal conduit
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Ureterostomy
Journal
Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany)
ISSN: 2731-7072
Titre abrégé: Urologie
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9918384886606676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jul 2024
16 Jul 2024
Historique:
accepted:
05
06
2024
medline:
16
7
2024
pubmed:
16
7
2024
entrez:
16
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
With increasing life expectancy there is also an increased need for the management of older (≥ 80 years) patients with the diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is the state of the art treatment (with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as long as the patient is fit enough). Choosing the best urinary diversion with respect to morbidity compared to functionality and quality of life remains a challenge in these patients. Physical age alone is not decisive for making a decision. A thorough preoperative assessment of medical features, physical and cognitive impairments is more important. Older patients are generally provided with an ileal conduit as an incontinent urinary diversion, as the intervention involves reduced operating times and complexity compared to continent urinary diversions; however, in the case of good health status with an adequate life expectancy and sufficient compliance, continent diversions may be considered even in aged candidates. In the case of multimorbid patients with a high perioperative risk, ureterostomy with permanent ureteric stents is an important alternative. Most importantly, a thorough preoperative counselling enables patients to reach an informed decision. Bei steigender Lebenserwartung gibt es zunehmend ältere (≥ 80 Jahre) PatientInnen mit der Diagnose eines muskelinvasiven Blasenkarzinoms. Therapie der Wahl ist die radikale Zystektomie mit Harnableitung (mit neoadjuvanter Chemotherapie, sofern belastbar). Die Auswahl der richtigen Harnableitung in Abwägung von Morbidität gegenüber Funktionalität und Lebensqualität stellt eine Herausforderung dar. Das kalendarische Alter allein ist nicht entscheidend. Wegweisend ist v. a. eine adäquate präoperative Begutachtung mit Blick auf medizinische Besonderheiten sowie physische und kognitive Einschränkungen. Standardmäßig wird bei älteren PatientInnen das Ileum-Conduit als inkontinente Harnableitung eingesetzt, da der Eingriff eine geringere Komplexität und Operationsdauer als eine kontinente Harnableitung aufweist. Fitte PatientInnen mit adäquater Lebenserwartung und ausreichender Compliance können jedoch auch im hohen Alter Kandidaten für kontinente Harnableitungen sein. Die Ureterokutaneostomie mit Harnleiterschienendauerversorgung ist eine wichtige Alternative für multimorbide PatientInnen mit hohem perioperativem Risiko. Wichtig ist v. a. eine gute präoperative Aufklärung, sodass PatientInnen eine informierte Entscheidung treffen können.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(ger)
Bei steigender Lebenserwartung gibt es zunehmend ältere (≥ 80 Jahre) PatientInnen mit der Diagnose eines muskelinvasiven Blasenkarzinoms. Therapie der Wahl ist die radikale Zystektomie mit Harnableitung (mit neoadjuvanter Chemotherapie, sofern belastbar). Die Auswahl der richtigen Harnableitung in Abwägung von Morbidität gegenüber Funktionalität und Lebensqualität stellt eine Herausforderung dar. Das kalendarische Alter allein ist nicht entscheidend. Wegweisend ist v. a. eine adäquate präoperative Begutachtung mit Blick auf medizinische Besonderheiten sowie physische und kognitive Einschränkungen. Standardmäßig wird bei älteren PatientInnen das Ileum-Conduit als inkontinente Harnableitung eingesetzt, da der Eingriff eine geringere Komplexität und Operationsdauer als eine kontinente Harnableitung aufweist. Fitte PatientInnen mit adäquater Lebenserwartung und ausreichender Compliance können jedoch auch im hohen Alter Kandidaten für kontinente Harnableitungen sein. Die Ureterokutaneostomie mit Harnleiterschienendauerversorgung ist eine wichtige Alternative für multimorbide PatientInnen mit hohem perioperativem Risiko. Wichtig ist v. a. eine gute präoperative Aufklärung, sodass PatientInnen eine informierte Entscheidung treffen können.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39012493
doi: 10.1007/s00120-024-02384-6
pii: 10.1007/s00120-024-02384-6
doi:
Types de publication
English Abstract
Journal Article
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
IARC (2024) Estimated number of new cases in 2022, worldwide, both sexes, all ages. 2020. Access Date March
Robert Koch Insitut. Krebs in Deutschland 2019/2020.; 2023.
Compérat E, Larré S, Roupret M et al (2015) Clinicopathological characteristics of urothelial bladder cancer in patients less than 40 years old. virchows Arch 466(5):589–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1739-2
doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1739-2
pubmed: 25697540
Witjes AJ, Bruins MH, Carrión A et al (2024) European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2023 Guidelines. Eur Urol 85(1):17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EURURO.2023.08.016
doi: 10.1016/J.EURURO.2023.08.016
Williams SB, Huo J, Chamie K, et al. Underutilization of Radical Cystectomy Among Patients Diagnosed with Clinical Stage T2 Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3(2–3):258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EUF.2016.04.008
Chamie K, Hu B, DeVere White RW, Ellison LM (2008) Cystectomy in the elderly: does the survival benefit in younger patients translate to the octogenarians? bju Int 102(3):284–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1464-410X.2008.07636.X
doi: 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2008.07636.X
pubmed: 18410437
Skinner EC, Stein JP, Skinner DG (2007) Surgical benchmarks for the treatment of invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 25(1):66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UROLONC.2006.05.010
doi: 10.1016/J.UROLONC.2006.05.010
pubmed: 17208142
Aziz A, May M, Burger M et al (2014) Prediction of 90-day mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in a prospective European multicenter cohort. Eur Urol 66(1):156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EURURO.2013.12.018
doi: 10.1016/J.EURURO.2013.12.018
pubmed: 24388438
Demaegd L, Albersen M, Muilwijk T et al (2020) Comparison of postoperative complications of ileal conduits versus orthotopic neobladders. Transl Androl Urol 9(6):2541–2554. https://doi.org/10.21037/TAU-20-713
doi: 10.21037/TAU-20-713
pubmed: 33457228
pmcid: 7807350
Zhu W, Wu L, Xie W et al (2023) Comparison of morbidity and mortality after radical cystectomy between individuals older and younger than 80 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11255-023-03897-3
doi: 10.1007/S11255-023-03897-3
pubmed: 38095810
pmcid: 10924015
Kontis V, Bennett JE, Mathers CD, Li G, Foreman K, Ezzati M. Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries: projections with a Bayesian model ensemble. Lancet (London, England). 2017;389(10076):1323–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32381-9
Clark PE, Stein JP, Groshen SG, et al. Radical cystectomy in the elderly: comparison of clincal outcomes between younger and older patients. Cancer. 2005;104(1):36–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/CNCR.21126
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geriatrie DGG. https://www.dggeriatrie.de/
Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONA/56.3.M146
doi: 10.1093/GERONA/56.3.M146
pubmed: 11584033
Shaw JF, Budiansky D, Sharif F, McIsaac DI (2022) The Association of Frailty with Outcomes after Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. ann Surg Oncol 29(8):4690–4704. https://doi.org/10.1245/S10434-021-11321-2
doi: 10.1245/S10434-021-11321-2
pubmed: 35072860
Williams SB, Kamat AM, Chamie K, et al. Systematic Review of Comorbidity and Competing-risks Assessments for Bladder Cancer Patients. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1(2):91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EUO.2018.03.005
Froehner M, Brausi MA, Herr HW, Muto G, Studer UE (2009) Complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the elderly. Eur Urol 56(3):443–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EURURO.2009.05.008
doi: 10.1016/J.EURURO.2009.05.008
pubmed: 19481861
Wuethrich PY, Vidal A, Burkhard FC. There is a place for radical cystectomy and urinary diversion, including orthotopic bladder substitution, in patients aged 75 and older: Results of a retrospective observational analysis from a high-volume center. Urol Oncol. 2016;34(2):58.e19–58.e27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UROLONC.2015.08.011
Sogni F, Brausi M, Frea B et al (2008) Morbidity and quality of life in elderly patients receiving ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder after radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer. Urology 71(5):919–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2007.11.125
doi: 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2007.11.125
pubmed: 18355900
Mortezavi A, Crippa A, Edeling S et al (2021) Morbidity and mortality after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion in octogenarians: results from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group. bju Int 127(5):585–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJU.15274
doi: 10.1111/BJU.15274
pubmed: 33058469
Donat SM, Siegrist T, Cronin A, Savage C, Milowsky MI, Herr HW (2010) Radical cystectomy in octogenarians—does morbidity outweigh the potential survival benefits? j Urol 183(6):2171–2177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JURO.2010.02.015
doi: 10.1016/J.JURO.2010.02.015
pubmed: 20399461
Huang S, Chen H, Li T, Pu X, Liu J, Bi X (2021) Comparison of survival in elderly patients treated with uretero-cutaneostomy or ileal conduit after radical cystectomy. bmc Geriatr. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12877-020-01861-9
doi: 10.1186/S12877-020-01861-9
pubmed: 34949161
pmcid: 8705191
Yamanaka K, Miyake H, Hara I, Inoue TA, Fujisawa M (2007) Significance of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients over 80 years old. Int Urol Nephrol 39(1):209–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11255-006-9122-5
doi: 10.1007/S11255-006-9122-5
pubmed: 17082907
Parekh DJ, Gilbert WB, Koch MO, Smith JA. Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: A contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Urology. 2000;55(6):852–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00619-6
Korkes F, Fernandes E, Gushiken FA et al (2022) Bricker ileal conduit vs. Cutaneous ureterostomy after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review. Int Braz J Urol 48(1):18–30. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0892
doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0892
pubmed: 33861058
Deliveliotis C, Papatsoris A, Chrisofos M, Dellis A, Liakouras C, Skolarikos A (2005) Urinary diversion in high-risk elderly patients: modified cutaneous ureterostomy or ileal conduit? Urology 66(2):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2005.03.031
doi: 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2005.03.031
pubmed: 16040096
Pycha A, Lodde M (2005) Uretero-Ureterocutaneostomy (Wrapped By Omentum). In: Hohenfellner R Fitzpatrick J Mcaninch J Eds advanced Urol Surg Third Ed
Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Perimenis P, et al. Attempted nerve sparing surgery and age have a significant effect on urinary continence and erectile function after radical cystoprostatectomy and ileal orthotopic bladder substitution. J Urol. 2004;172(4 Pt 1):1323–1327. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000138249.31644.EC
Yang LS, Shan BL, Shan LL et al (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Surg Oncol 25(3):281–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURONC.2016.05.027
doi: 10.1016/J.SURONC.2016.05.027
pubmed: 27566035
Clement KD, Pearce E, Gabr AH, Rai BP, Al-Ansari A, Aboumarzouk OM (2021) Perioperative outcomes and safety of robotic vs open cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12,640 cases. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00345-020-03385-8
doi: 10.1007/S00345-020-03385-8
pubmed: 34550425
Su X, Wu K, Wang S et al (2020) The impact of orthotopic neobladder vs ileal conduit urinary diversion after cystectomy on the survival outcomes in patients with bladder cancer: A propensity score matched analysis. Cancer Med 9(20):7590–7600. https://doi.org/10.1002/CAM4.3404
doi: 10.1002/CAM4.3404
pubmed: 32869540
pmcid: 7571812
Check DK, Leo MC, Banegas MP et al (2020) Decision Regret Related to Urinary Diversion Choice among Patients Treated with Cystectomy. j Urol 203(1):159–163. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000512
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000512
pubmed: 31441673
Köther AK, Büdenbender B, Grüne B et al (2022) Different patients, different preferences: A multicenter assessment of patients’ personality traits and anxiety in shared decision making. Cancer Med 11(15):2999–3008. https://doi.org/10.1002/CAM4.4667
doi: 10.1002/CAM4.4667
pubmed: 35322925
pmcid: 9359866
Siddiqui KM, Izawa JI (2016) Ileal conduit: standard urinary diversion for elderly patients undergoing radical cystectomy. World J Urol 34(1):19–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00345-015-1706-1
doi: 10.1007/S00345-015-1706-1
pubmed: 26475274
Hugen CM, Daneshmand S (2016) Orthotopic urinary diversion in the elderly. World J Urol 34(1):13–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00345-015-1696-Z
doi: 10.1007/S00345-015-1696-Z
pubmed: 26410825
Longo N, Imbimbo C, Fusco F et al (2016) Complications and quality of life in elderly patients with several comorbidities undergoing cutaneous ureterostomy with single stoma or ileal conduit after radical cystectomy. bju Int 118(4):521–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJU.13462
doi: 10.1111/BJU.13462
pubmed: 26935245
Mühlberg W, Platt D (1999) Age-dependent changes of the kidneys: pharmacological implications. Gerontology 45(5):243–253. https://doi.org/10.1159/000022097
doi: 10.1159/000022097
pubmed: 10460985
Lee RK, Abol-Enein H, Artibani W et al (2014) Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes. bju Int 113(1):11–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJU.12121
doi: 10.1111/BJU.12121
pubmed: 24330062
Lawrentschuk QLGN (2019) Orthotopic Neobladder Reconstruction: Patient Selection And Perspectives. Res reports. Urol 11:333–341. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S181473
doi: 10.2147/RRU.S181473
Yajima S, Nakanishi Y, Yasujima R et al (2023) Rapid geriatric screening tools predict inability to manage stoma by oneself after urinary diversion: G8 and IADL-modified G8. J Geriatr Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JGO.2023.101468
doi: 10.1016/J.JGO.2023.101468
pubmed: 36870222