Results from a multicenter retrospective study of transradial iliac artery stenting in Japan.
Endovascular treatment
Iliac artery
Peripheral arterial disease
Stent
Transradial intervention
Journal
Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics
ISSN: 1868-4297
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Interv Ther
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101522043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jul 2024
16 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
24
01
2024
accepted:
04
07
2024
medline:
16
7
2024
pubmed:
16
7
2024
entrez:
16
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Large-scale multicenter studies demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of transradial iliac artery stenting are lacking. We evaluated the data from a multicenter database in Japan. Transradial iliac artery stenting was performed on 115 lesions in 105 patients. The approach site was determined at the discretion of the operator. Patients with scheduled multiple sheath insertions for the bidirectional approach were excluded. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The average age of this cohort was 71.1 ± 8.3 years. Eighty-six patients (81.9%) were male. Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking habit were present in 39 (37.1%), 84 (80.0%), 69 (65.7%), and 78 patients (74.3%), respectively. Rutherford classifications 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 comprised 40 (34.8%), 42 (36.5%), 28 (24.3%), 3 (2.6%), and 2 (1.7%) lesions, respectively, while Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II classifications A, B, C, and D comprised 74 (64.3%), 21 (18.3%), 15 (13.0%), and 5 (4.3%), respectively. Twenty-seven lesions (23.5%) had chronic total occlusion. All lesions were successfully treated with 141 stents. Four patients (3.8%) required additional puncture of the common femoral artery for successful stent implantation. The ankle-brachial index significantly improved from 0.65 ± 0.17 to 0.95 ± 0.15 (P < 0.0001). None of the patients experienced any procedural or access site-related complications. Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion was observed in three cases (2.9%) after the procedure. There were no target lesion revascularizations or complications at 1 month. Compared to the traditional transfemoral approach, transradial iliac artery stenting is safe and feasible without any specific complications in carefully selected patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39012574
doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01026-0
pii: 10.1007/s12928-024-01026-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
Références
Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, Roe MT, Brindis R, Rumsfeld JS, et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1:379–86.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.007
pubmed: 19463333
Cox N, Resnic FS, Popma JJ, Simon DI, Eisenhauer AC, Rogers C. Comparison of the risk of vascular complications associated with femoral and radial access coronary catheterization procedures in obese versus nonobese patients. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:1174–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.07.088
pubmed: 15518615
Hamon M, Coutance G. Transradial intervention for minimizing bleeding complications in percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:55C-C59.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.06.023
pubmed: 19695363
Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, Rigattieri S, Turri M, Anselmi M, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:349–56.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.034
pubmed: 15261930
Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1269–75.
doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00064-8
pubmed: 9137223
Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W, Wieczorek M, Holtgen R, Tillmanns H. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:1047–54.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.016
pubmed: 19926042
Shinozaki N, Ogata N, Ikari Y. Initial results of transradial iliac artery stenting. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2014;48:51–4.
doi: 10.1177/1538574413510621
pubmed: 24203346
Shinozaki N, Minowa T, Murakami T, Ohno Y, Nakano M, Fujii T, et al. Slender transradial iliac artery stenting using a 4.5 French guiding sheath. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019;34:9–13.
doi: 10.1007/s12928-017-0506-5
pubmed: 29305825
Meertens MM, Ng E, Loh SEK, Samuel M, Mees BME, Choong A. Transradial approach for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25:599–607.
doi: 10.1177/1526602818792854
pubmed: 30086665
Yatskar L, Selzer F, Feit F, Cohen HA, Jacobs AK, Williams DO, et al. Access site hematoma requiring blood transfusion predicts mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: data from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:961–6.
doi: 10.1002/ccd.21087
pubmed: 17421023
Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2465–76.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6
pubmed: 25791214
Soga Y, Iida O, Kawasaki D, Yamauchi Y, Suzuki K, Hirano K, et al. Contemporary outcomes after endovascular treatment for aorto-iliac artery disease. Circ J. 2012;76:2697–704.
doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0492
pubmed: 22864278
Suzuki K, Mizutani Y, Soga Y, Iida O, Kawasaki D, Yamauchi Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy for aortoiliac TASC D lesions. Angiology. 2017;68:67–73.
doi: 10.1177/0003319716638005
pubmed: 26980775
Yamauchi Y, Takahara M, Shintani Y, Iida O, Sugano T, Yamamoto Y, et al. One-year outcomes of endovascular therapy for aortoiliac lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e007441.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007441
pubmed: 30616363
Roy AK, Garot P, Louvard Y, Neylon A, Spaziano M, Sawaya FJ, et al. Comparison of transradial vs transfemoral access for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal interventions: a single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:880–8.
doi: 10.1177/1526602816665617
pubmed: 27558461
Coscas R, de Blic R, Capdevila C, Javerliat I, Goeau-Brissonniere O, Coggia M. Percutaneous radial access for peripheral transluminal angioplasty. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:463–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.009
pubmed: 25135875
Cortese B, Trani C, Lorenzoni R, Sbarzaglia P, Latib A, Tommasino A, et al. Safety and feasibility of iliac endovascular interventions with a radial approach. Results from a multicenter study coordinated by the Italian Radial Force. Int J Cardiol. 2014;175:280–4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.05.012
pubmed: 24861256
Lorenzoni R, Lisi C, Corciu A, Lazzari M, Bovenzi F. Tailored use of transradial access for above-the-knee angioplasty. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21:635–40.
doi: 10.1583/14-4747R.1
pubmed: 25290790
Shinozaki N, Ikari Y. Distal radial artery approach for endovascular therapy. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022;37:533–7.
doi: 10.1007/s12928-021-00801-7
pubmed: 34409565
Shinozaki N, Minowa T, Ikari Y. Transradial intervention for chronic total occlusion at the external iliac artery using a bidirectional approach through a single guiding catheter. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32:174–7.
doi: 10.1007/s12928-016-0387-z
pubmed: 26972433